Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * - - - 5 votes

Kate Middleton is not a Princess!


  • Please log in to reply
123 replies to this topic

#61    Bonecrusher

Bonecrusher

    Facebook Fiend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,113 posts
  • Joined:25 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middleton,Greater Manchester,UK

  • Your blood's worth bottling!

Posted 16 January 2013 - 09:10 PM

Accents? Well what do you know.

Mine sounds Mancunian with a dull monotone.
It's about as rough as the stubble on my chin.
You could say it's lack of elocution lessons that's made me this way.
Which could explain why posh people sound like they could cut glass.
Elocution lessons I believe are compulsory in the public school system.
If they didn't get this extra tuition they would sound like Dot Cotton.

I prefer a more natural accent because it gives you character and extra depth.

Edited by Medium Brown, 16 January 2013 - 09:10 PM.

Swindon Town:  Division Two Champions 2011-12.
Proud member of Macdonald's Red Army since 1989.
Up the Robins!

#62    archer95446

archer95446

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 292 posts
  • Joined:04 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:here, not there!!!

  • The picture is of my great great grandparents, on their 60th wedding anniversary!!!

Posted 17 January 2013 - 01:08 AM

View Postquestionmark, on 16 January 2013 - 05:33 PM, said:

If Kate has a kid first, boy or girl then William will not be the next in line. In view that the kid is still in the works, he still is. And if instead of a William it would be a Williamette she would also be the next in line.
Kate is possibly having twins, so they say!!!!  And the Royal baby/babies are due in July!!!!!   Whether the have only one baby or twins, the child or children will
be next in line, before Prince Harry!!!!   IMO, I really don't think Harry cares much about whose next in line for the throne anyways!!!!


#63    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,974 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 17 January 2013 - 02:09 AM

I vote for KATE UPTON as princess!

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#64    Antilles

Antilles

    NCC-1701

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,216 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:2nd star from the left

Posted 17 January 2013 - 06:26 AM

Actually, Diana was a commoner as well before she married Charles.
Kate Middleton is HRH The Duchess of Cambridge. She took her husband's royal title when she married him. Whether you like royalty or not is not the point of this thread. I think. ;) Diana and Fergie were stripped of the HRH after their divorces. By the Queen. She can do that. Wallis Simpson, wife of the Duke of Windsor, once the King of Great Britain, was an HRH but the palace refused her the title. Princess Anne refused the HRH for her 2 children.
HRH is automatically conferred upon marriage but the Queen has the prerogative to withdraw it or with hold it. Camilla Parker Bowles is HRH the Duchess of Cornwall. The Duke of Cornwall is one of Charles' minor titles. Forget Kate Middleton for the moment. The next Queen Consort of GB will be Diana's greatest enemy.


#65    spud the mackem

spud the mackem

    Spud the Mackem

  • Member
  • 3,588 posts
  • Joined:28 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yeo Valley,Darkest Somerset.

  • man who ask for nothing shall never be disappointed

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:14 AM

The problem is that through time the British Royalty has more mixed blood than I have, not that I'm against Royalty,as some of them do a good job,but thats what it is,a job.and any old codger can become a Knight,Win a gold medal or two at the Olympics and hey presto you are a Knight, and therefor are addressed as Sir,which to me is a load of old socks.Ah well I'll just be a Commoner  a plain Mr with British blood,with no foreign stuff mixed in.

(1) try your best, ............if that dont work.
(2) try your second best, ........if that dont work
(3) give up you aint gonna win

#66    Order66

Order66

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,259 posts
  • Joined:05 Oct 2010
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Thanatos

  • The hate is swelling in you now. Take your Jedi weapon. Use it. I am unarmed. Strike me down with it. Give in to your anger ...

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:36 AM

Quote

Why not?  Because she doesn't have royal juice in her veins, that's why.

Yes, the queen made her a Duchess, but Kate Middleton is still not a member of nobility.   She's not 'Lady Middleton', she's just Kate Middleton.  

Her husband is Prince William, but Kate Middleton is no Princess.  

The Yanks, reading their tabloid fairy tales about princesses, need to get it right.

http://www.foxnews.c...gnancy-related/

They should use the correct official title. I hate when in the news they refer for example to "Ex-President Clinton". It's not correct, President's an official title you have for life. They only add the term "Ex" for the benefit of people who don't realize that he's not president anymore. If you don't know he's not president anymore, then you're probably not keeping up with the news anyway, so why bother?  

Quote

The problem is that through time the British Royalty has more mixed blood than I have, not that I'm against Royalty,as some of them do a good job,but thats what it is,a job.and any old codger can become a Knight,Win a gold medal or two at the Olympics and hey presto you are a Knight, and therefor are addressed as Sir,which to me is a load of old socks.

Kind of like the Nobel Prize ...

Posted Image

#67    zebra99

zebra99

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 300 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:17 AM

These are the people that are keen to see Royalty continue.
In a Republic they would lose all their power and status.Top civil servants,politicians, and the like just love the system as it is with their knighthoods and meaningless honours.
The so called upper classes which includes media bosses will promote royalty in any way they can to retain their privileged lifestyle.

There are a few million amongst the peasants that are flag waving royalists...but ask any group of working people in the pub what they think of royalty and you will come across total indifference.The women would appear to be more interested in the clothes they wear than anything else.

Posted Image

Edited by zebra99, 17 January 2013 - 11:18 AM.

Posted Image

#68    libstaK

libstaK

    Nosce Te Ipsum

  • 6,926 posts
  • Joined:06 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

  • Hello Reality and all that is True
    When Oxymoron was defined it was just for you

Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:39 AM

View Postzebra99, on 17 January 2013 - 11:17 AM, said:

These are the people that are keen to see Royalty continue.
In a Republic they would lose all their power and status.Top civil servants,politicians, and the like just love the system as it is with their knighthoods and meaningless honours.
The so called upper classes which includes media bosses will promote royalty in any way they can to retain their privileged lifestyle.

There are a few million amongst the peasants that are flag waving royalists...but ask any group of working people in the pub what they think of royalty and you will come across total indifference.The women would appear to be more interested in the clothes they wear than anything else.

Posted Image
Oh my, there is something about all them hats together with the british stiff upper lip expression they are mostly wearing that really does seem ridiculous lol.

"I warn you, whoever you are, oh you who wish to probe the arcanes of nature, if you do not find within yourself that which you seek, neither shall you find it outside.
If you ignore the excellencies of your own house, how do you intend to find other excellencies?
In you is hidden the treasure of treasures, Oh man, know thyself and you shall know the Universe and the Gods."

Inscription - Temple of Delphi

#69    Beckys_Mom

Beckys_Mom

    Sarcastic Muppet..!

  • Member
  • 51,196 posts
  • Joined:01 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ireland

  • "I hate pretentious people. I mean, what is the point in applying exorbitantly extensive vocabulary, it is just straightforwardly unnecessary".

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:20 PM

View PostlibstaK, on 17 January 2013 - 11:39 AM, said:

Oh my, there is something about all them hats together with the british stiff upper lip expression they are mostly wearing that really does seem ridiculous lol.

One must keep a stiff upper lip to make a good impression you know.. It's jolly good fun   lol

Edited by Beckys_Mom, 17 January 2013 - 12:21 PM.

Posted ImageRAW Berris... Dare you enter?

If there's a heaven...I hope to hell I get there !

#70    libstaK

libstaK

    Nosce Te Ipsum

  • 6,926 posts
  • Joined:06 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

  • Hello Reality and all that is True
    When Oxymoron was defined it was just for you

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:29 PM

View PostBeckys_Mom, on 17 January 2013 - 12:20 PM, said:

One must keep a stiff upper lip to make a good impression you know.. It's jolly good fun   lol
Exactly the idea in my mind when I see that pic, it's so so, well - is pompous too strong a word? :P

"I warn you, whoever you are, oh you who wish to probe the arcanes of nature, if you do not find within yourself that which you seek, neither shall you find it outside.
If you ignore the excellencies of your own house, how do you intend to find other excellencies?
In you is hidden the treasure of treasures, Oh man, know thyself and you shall know the Universe and the Gods."

Inscription - Temple of Delphi

#71    Bonecrusher

Bonecrusher

    Facebook Fiend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,113 posts
  • Joined:25 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middleton,Greater Manchester,UK

  • Your blood's worth bottling!

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:36 PM

View Postzebra99, on 17 January 2013 - 11:17 AM, said:

These are the people that are keen to see Royalty continue.
In a Republic they would lose all their power and status.Top civil servants,politicians, and the like just love the system as it is with their knighthoods and meaningless honours.
The so called upper classes which includes media bosses will promote royalty in any way they can to retain their privileged lifestyle.

There are a few million amongst the peasants that are flag waving royalists...but ask any group of working people in the pub what they think of royalty and you will come across total indifference.The women would appear to be more interested in the clothes they wear than anything else.

Posted Image
I wouldn't be seen dead in top hat and tails...

Not even if it's required of me in a job interview.
But it's their lookout if they want to keep looking like penguins.

Edited by Medium Brown, 17 January 2013 - 12:36 PM.

Swindon Town:  Division Two Champions 2011-12.
Proud member of Macdonald's Red Army since 1989.
Up the Robins!

#72    Glenville86

Glenville86

    Alien Embryo

  • Closed
  • Pip
  • 73 posts
  • Joined:12 Dec 2012

Posted 17 January 2013 - 01:12 PM

View Postarcher95446, on 17 January 2013 - 01:08 AM, said:


Kate is possibly having twins, so they say!!!!  And the Royal baby/babies are due in July!!!!!   Whether the have only one baby or twins, the child or children will
be next in line, before Prince Harry!!!!   IMO, I really don't think Harry cares much about whose next in line for the throne anyways!!!!

I personally do not think William and Harry have the same Father.


#73    BuzzLightYear

BuzzLightYear

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 38 posts
  • Joined:20 Mar 2009

Posted 17 January 2013 - 01:29 PM

View PostYamato, on 14 January 2013 - 11:38 PM, said:

Why not?  Because she doesn't have royal juice in her veins, that's why.

Yes, the queen made her a Duchess, but Kate Middleton is still not a member of nobility.   She's not 'Lady Middleton', she's just Kate Middleton.  

Her husband is Prince William, but Kate Middleton is no Princess.  

The Yanks, reading their tabloid fairy tales about princesses, need to get it right.

http://www.foxnews.c...gnancy-related/

We yanks got it right and gave the crown their proper respect and they graciously accepted at Yorktown. :gun:

Edited by BuzzLightYear, 17 January 2013 - 01:30 PM.


#74    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,928 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 17 January 2013 - 04:05 PM

Why can't the English learn to speak?

View PostBuzzLightYear, on 17 January 2013 - 01:29 PM, said:

We yanks got it right and gave the crown their proper respect and they graciously accepted at Yorktown. :gun:
We taught the privilege class of "Sirs" and "Ladies" and "Lords" a permanent lesson in humility.  Of course they were all sipping tea and eating pudding and reading their newspapers exclaiming "Oh dear!"  The British citizens worth their lives were getting killed over here trying to impose themselves on us per their glorious highness's will.

That reminds me, we should have resurrected our Revolutionary War names for our capital ships.   The USS Yorktown or Lexington or Saratoga would have sounded so much better than the USS George H.W. Bush.

Hard to believe this pomp and privilege still lives in this day and age.  The main reason Kate is so popular in the world is because she's beautiful.  Let's just be frank about that.   What's more popular than what's cute, pretty and gorgeous?   The words "Justin Bieber" have infested the comments section of virtually every song by any band on the internet.   That kid can't even sing worth a spit.  I was a little disappointed to find a poster of Justin on the wall in my niece's room when she assured me more than once she didn't like him.   Now I know what emotional response this comment is going to evoke and I'll answer the question ahead of time.  What's wrong with it, is that it's shallow.   If you like someone or something merely for the way they look, that's the shallowest form of like there is.   Nobody even cares that Charles is actually in love with Camilla.  She's the villain because that's how she's painted up to be.  Whatever.  The world would be better off without these people in it, so our people would have something important to spend their time gawking at.  

Merit is what matters.   What blood you are should be completely eliminated as a consideration towards how we treat people.   That's the reason this thread exists.  That's the point I came here to make, especially in light of how great all these anti-Americans on the US board make the UK out to be.   I'll repeat the point of this discussion again so everyone is loud and clear:  What blood you are should be completely eliminated from all consideration towards how we treat people.   Any questions?   The monarchy should be laid to rest in the history books where it belongs.  It should "vanish from the pages of time", if you will.   Why don't ya try that one on, Queen?

Edited by Yamato, 17 January 2013 - 04:11 PM.

"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#75    Mr Right Wing

Mr Right Wing

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,924 posts
  • Joined:16 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 17 January 2013 - 04:15 PM

View PostGlenville86, on 17 January 2013 - 01:12 PM, said:

I personally do not think William and Harry have the same Father.

I pointed that out a few months back and got grief.

James Hewitt looks like Harry.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users