Atentutankh-pasheri, on 01 March 2013 - 06:51 PM, said:
Actually, there is no need for any new Pope. While there is no Bishop of Rome, then the Patriarch of Constantinople, the Archbishop of New Rome, is the highest authority in Christendom. So, heretics of the West, take this opportunity to return to orthodoxy and embrace Patriarch Bartholomew as your leader. You also need to pay reperations for the sack of Constantinople in the Crusades, and for leaving Constantinople to it's fate in 1453. Venetians and Genovese will be exempt from paying reperations of course.
Bwahahahahaaa...
Aww... don’t worry, lonely troll, I’ll feed you. I'm experienced in dealing with Byzantine logic, sadly
So, where was Saint Peter, the rock on which the Church is built, crucified?
In Rome or in Istanbul?
How can any
New Rome be
older than the
original Rome?
The first step towards the reunification of Christianity was already done by establishing Eastern Catholic churches, also known as Greco-Catholic churches.
They use Byzantine liturgical rite but they are in the full union (the same Pope included, of course) with the Roman Catholic Church. The one that is built on the rock Jesus himself named in person of St.Peter.
So unless St.Pete's bones walk - with no Byzantine help, mind you! - to Istanbul, city built in the place of the long lost Constantinople, Rome will not be shifted to the East, geographically or spiritually.
And whose duty it was to defend Constantinople? Byzantine. Who failed? Byzantines. What they are entitled to? Reparations? But of course, take this post as the first tranche.
Edited by Helen of Annoy, 01 March 2013 - 07:40 PM.