Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

The Incas, explorers of the Pacific


  • Please log in to reply
304 replies to this topic

#256    The_Spartan

The_Spartan

    Spartan Forever!!!!

  • Member
  • 3,722 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Gravity is Arbitrary!!

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:44 AM

Göbekli Tepe wasnt buried in a day or a month or a year.
Each layer has been dated and there is close to 1000 years difference bewteen the 1st layer and the last. Lab-Number Date BP Cal BCE Context Ua-19561 8430 ± 80 7560–7370 enclosure C Ua-19562 8960 ± 85 8280–7970 enclosure B Hd-20025 9452 ± 73 9110–8620 Layer III Hd-20036 9559 ± 53 9130–8800 Layer III
http://en.wikipedia....i/Göbekli_Tepe

And now dont tell me that the "Hunter Gatherer" Culture stayed as Hunter Gatherers for all these 1000 year years.
they might have started as Hunter Gatherers, like every civilization or culture, but they advanced/had to advance technolocially/culturally over the 1000 years.

"Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent.-Napoleon Hill

Follow my stupid posts on Tumblr at Azrael's Ramblings

#257    Harsh86_Patel

Harsh86_Patel

    Psychic Spy

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India

  • If you stare into the abyss,the abyss stares back into you

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:46 AM

View PostThe_Spartan, on 06 May 2013 - 08:37 AM, said:

How would you know whether it is the truth or not?
Were you  a Primitive Hunter Gatherer in one of your past incarnations?

Its speculation only.
It is only speculation basis which the Mainstream calls them primitive hunter gatherers.
Were you a sitting with a binocular when they were building this structure to check if it was primitive hunter gatherers building it?
Does it seem like a primitive hunter gatherer group can execute such an organised effort?
Your speculations of them being primitive seems like a primitive speculation.


#258    The_Spartan

The_Spartan

    Spartan Forever!!!!

  • Member
  • 3,722 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Gravity is Arbitrary!!

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:47 AM

View PostHarsh86_Patel, on 06 May 2013 - 10:46 AM, said:

It is only speculation basis which the Mainstream calls them primitive hunter gatherers.
Were you a sitting with a binocular when they were building this structure to check if it was primitive hunter gatherers building it?
Does it seem like a primitive hunter gatherer group can execute such an organised effort?
Your speculations of them being primitive seems like a primitive speculation.
No. I didnt sit with a binocular  but i use what is known as common sense in anlayzing data, which i feel you  are lacking.

"Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent.-Napoleon Hill

Follow my stupid posts on Tumblr at Azrael's Ramblings

#259    Harsh86_Patel

Harsh86_Patel

    Psychic Spy

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India

  • If you stare into the abyss,the abyss stares back into you

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:48 AM

View PostThe_Spartan, on 06 May 2013 - 10:44 AM, said:

Göbekli Tepe wasnt buried in a day or a month or a year.
Each layer has been dated and there is close to 1000 years difference bewteen the 1st layer and the last. Lab-Number Date BP Cal BCE Context Ua-19561 8430 ± 80 7560–7370 enclosure C Ua-19562 8960 ± 85 8280–7970 enclosure B Hd-20025 9452 ± 73 9110–8620 Layer III Hd-20036 9559 ± 53 9130–8800 Layer III
http://en.wikipedia....i/Göbekli_Tepe

And now dont tell me that the "Hunter Gatherer" Culture stayed as Hunter Gatherers for all these 1000 year years.
they might have started as Hunter Gatherers, like every civilization or culture, but they advanced/had to advance technolocially/culturally over the 1000 years.

What is your opinion of the people who built it?
Were they primitive hunter gatherers when they built it?


#260    Harsh86_Patel

Harsh86_Patel

    Psychic Spy

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India

  • If you stare into the abyss,the abyss stares back into you

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:51 AM

View PostThe_Spartan, on 06 May 2013 - 10:47 AM, said:

No. I didnt sit with a binocular  but i use what is known as common sense in anlayzing data, which i feel you  are lacking.
So let me sum up your common sense:

You find a structure of a comparable scale to the GP, then you understand further that it would have taken 500 people 15 years to build it. And what is your deduction?
Ans. They were primitive hunter gatherers.

If what i have written above is right then just say so, i will no more question your common sense.


#261    The_Spartan

The_Spartan

    Spartan Forever!!!!

  • Member
  • 3,722 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Gravity is Arbitrary!!

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:57 AM

View PostHarsh86_Patel, on 06 May 2013 - 10:48 AM, said:

What is your opinion of the people who built it?
Were they primitive hunter gatherers when they built it?

Since i do refer to academic reports and records, i do believe that they were hunter gatherers once, but they advanced as time passed.
Not primitive as in caveman style. But primitive when compared to the era the last layer was buried.

"Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent.-Napoleon Hill

Follow my stupid posts on Tumblr at Azrael's Ramblings

#262    The_Spartan

The_Spartan

    Spartan Forever!!!!

  • Member
  • 3,722 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Gravity is Arbitrary!!

Posted 06 May 2013 - 11:02 AM

View PostHarsh86_Patel, on 06 May 2013 - 10:51 AM, said:

So let me sum up your common sense:

You find a structure of a comparable scale to the GP, then you understand further that it would have taken 500 people 15 years to build it. And what is your deduction?
Ans. They were primitive hunter gatherers.

If what i have written above is right then just say so, i will no more question your common sense.

No. Building up and covering are two activities with two different efforts.
You still don’t understand that the structures in the original layer are yet to be excavated.
As with any build up or architectural style, it starts simple or primitive and develops as time progresses.
The 1st construct in Gobekli tepe would have been simple.
Why the 1st constructs were buried, is a matter still open to discussion and exploration?
But, there was constructs for each layer, better than the last.

Moving huge blocks of stones up a height is different that erection slabs of stones and carvings.
Burying the constructs also isn’t that time or energy consuming as building the GP.
You have to be an Engineer and a Project manager to assess the time, logistics and manpower required for constructing a GP and constructing & burying a Gobekli Tepe.

Edited by The_Spartan, 06 May 2013 - 11:03 AM.

"Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent.-Napoleon Hill

Follow my stupid posts on Tumblr at Azrael's Ramblings

#263    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,104 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 06 May 2013 - 11:17 AM

View PostHarsh86_Patel, on 06 May 2013 - 10:48 AM, said:

What is your opinion of the people who built it?
Were they primitive hunter gatherers when they built it?

I think it was you who started a thread about Göbekli Tepe, and there are several others. I think the current discussion is going to get far off topic.


#264    The_Spartan

The_Spartan

    Spartan Forever!!!!

  • Member
  • 3,722 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Gravity is Arbitrary!!

Posted 06 May 2013 - 11:34 AM

Yeah. Let us get back to the Incan navy, Hic!!

"Fifteen Incans on the dead man's chest
Yo-ho-ho, and a bottle of Xtabentún!
Drink and the devil had done for the rest
Yo-ho-ho, and a bottle of Xtabentún!"

"Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent.-Napoleon Hill

Follow my stupid posts on Tumblr at Azrael's Ramblings

#265    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,104 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 06 May 2013 - 11:52 AM

View PostThe_Spartan, on 06 May 2013 - 11:34 AM, said:

Yeah. Let us get back to the Incan navy, Hic!!

"Fifteen Incans on the dead man's chest
Yo-ho-ho, and a bottle of Xtabentún!
Drink and the devil had done for the rest
Yo-ho-ho, and a bottle of Xtabentún!"

Must be late where you live, lol.


#266    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,104 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 06 May 2013 - 11:57 AM

OK, I think the next is very ON topic.

Brien Foerster is not my favorite writer (he sees aliens and very advanced technology everywhere), but on this page of his website he offers some interesting ideas:

http://hiddenincatou...he-polynesians/

Though not directly related to this topic, this is also quite interesting:

The early Spanish chronicler Fernando de Montesinos, author of Memorias Antiguas y Historiales del Peru (1642) (Ancient Memories and Histories of Peru) wrote that the early Inca did indeed have at least a hieroglyphic system which was banned by Sapa Inca Pachacutec (also known as Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui) out of the fear that the general public might learn it. The Inca were supposedly generous and kind rulers, supposedly, in many ways, but the public were restricted as to what they could do and learn.

Sariemento Gamboa, upon consulting as assembly of forty-two learned Inca historians recorded the following in reference to the ninth Inca ‘Patchacuti Inca Yupanqui’:
‘…after he had well ascertained the most notable of their ancient histories he had it all painted after its order on large boards, and he placed them in the house of the sun, where the said boards, which were garnished with gold, would be like our libraries, and he appointed learned men who could understand and explain them…’


I remember that on a couple of 16th century drawings/paintings of Inca rulers you can indeed see on their claoks a checkboard like motif filled with what does look like a script.

+++

EDIT:

Not the image I had in my mind, but this one depicting Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui also has these symbols:

Posted Image


Could also be nothing but meaningless decoration, of course.

.

Edited by Abramelin, 06 May 2013 - 12:28 PM.


#267    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,104 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 06 May 2013 - 12:27 PM

Ah, it was his father, Viracocha Inca:

Posted Image
(paintings by Guamán Poma)
+++

EDIT:

To give you an idea about Foerster's 'cherry picking facts', read what he writes about the Chachapoya, and compare that with what you can read on this Wiki page from which he copied:

http://en.wikipedia....chapoya_culture


.

Edited by Abramelin, 06 May 2013 - 12:38 PM.


#268    The_Spartan

The_Spartan

    Spartan Forever!!!!

  • Member
  • 3,722 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Gravity is Arbitrary!!

Posted 06 May 2013 - 12:55 PM

Some photographs of incan motif quilts

Posted Image

and in this pic below the mayan woman on the left is shown wearing some cloth with  a similart pattern

Posted Image

"Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent.-Napoleon Hill

Follow my stupid posts on Tumblr at Azrael's Ramblings

#269    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,104 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 06 May 2013 - 01:12 PM

The Incan quilts appear to show repeating motifs, and not in a regular way like in decoration.

I leafed a bit through Fernando de Montesinos' "Memorias Antiguas y Historiales del Peru":

http://archive.org/d...tigua01tolegoog

.... but found nothing yet about these "hieroglyphs"


#270    Harsh86_Patel

Harsh86_Patel

    Psychic Spy

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India

  • If you stare into the abyss,the abyss stares back into you

Posted 06 May 2013 - 01:13 PM

View PostThe_Spartan, on 06 May 2013 - 11:02 AM, said:


No. Building up and covering are two activities with two different efforts.
You still don’t understand that the structures in the original layer are yet to be excavated.
As with any build up or architectural style, it starts simple or primitive and develops as time progresses.
The 1st construct in Gobekli tepe would have been simple.
Why the 1st constructs were buried, is a matter still open to discussion and exploration?
But, there was constructs for each layer, better than the last.

Moving huge blocks of stones up a height is different that erection slabs of stones and carvings.
Burying the constructs also isn’t that time or energy consuming as building the GP.
You have to be an Engineer and a Project manager to assess the time, logistics and manpower required for constructing a GP and constructing & burying a Gobekli Tepe.
When i reffered to 500 men taking 15 years , i was reiterating the sillsbury hill link posted by Abe.

You make a good point finally. But only further digs there will tell of what was the level of constructions of the older sites.

Though unless there is a major difference between the styles observed in the upper and lower layers it would be difficult to attribute a prolonged period for it's construction.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users