I believe you, on 05 January 2013 - 12:27 PM, said:
You didn't read or fully understand the article, it specifically stated those who are religious are the least likely to have problems, even less than those who are secular or spiritual (with no religious affiliation).
It is those who are spiritual (with no religious affiliation) who are likely to have the most issues according to this article.
That makes sense because those who claim to be spiritual yet not religious most likely have a weak social network since they are not religious it also means they are less likely to be part of a group such as a church. Social isolation and weak social bonds all impact health.
Those who are secular most likely are part of groups. When you are spiritual, too spiritual, it can make you a loner.
Also the "no atheists in foxholes" adage was proven wrong, there was an article a while back posted here, studies showed atheists are likely to hold on to their beliefs even if death is imminent.
Sorry yes. I was just going off this quote from the op.
""Our main finding is that people who had a spiritual understanding of life had worse mental health than those with an understanding that was neither religious nor spiritual."
Seemed like a summery to me. But it's worded funny or amibguouse or something. It's got to many negatives in it which confuses the sentence. "worse", "neither" and "nor" all referring to "spiritual".
Upon actually reading the articles I see what you mean. That quote is worded funny.
I still say that those with problems will turn to spiritual inclinations . The foxhole is a concept not an absolute. Quite obviously those with entrenched beliefs will hold them, but those on the margins will likely cross over.
Now. The foxhole adage. What proof. Keep hearing this but I have never seen an offering of proof. Not that I think it's an absolute truth. But the main theme of the adage is that in dangerous life threatening situations people tend to turn to spiritual inclinations a lot easier. The atheist with a catholic upbringing might just sign the cross just incase. I'm sure it has happened many times.
In regards to the article. I would not argue this. I see it aswell. Many people with problems seek spirituality, the problem of course is that those that cannot accept a religion do not get the a "answer" that they are seeking, and the network of support that religion is usefull for. Then ontop of the matter religions in a way will shun them. I absolutely cannot express my spiritual beliefs and practices in my community otherwise be labeled.
I would consider it less the creation of the person, but more a cause of the exclusivity usually created by religions themselves. But that's just a guess.
People that are seekers tend to be a bit more turbulent and come from a wider verity of back grounds than those that live the comfy life of acceptance.
Edited by Seeker79, 05 January 2013 - 03:04 PM.
"To know oneself is to study one self in action with another person. Relationship is a process of self evaluation and self revelation. Relationship is the mirror in which you discover yourself - to be is to be related."---Bruce Lee