Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 6 votes

WTC 911 EyeWitness~Hoboken


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3683 replies to this topic

#556    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:31 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:28 PM, said:

My years of expertise in NOTHING trumps that of these pure amatuers of science. <---Who does that sound like to you?? lol

That doesn't work for you! :w00t:

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:27 PM, said:

No, I haven't forgot what he said about fires being responsible for the collapse,

Thank you!

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#557    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:32 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:30 PM, said:

Who cares what you say, you think you are right, even when you are evidently wrong...which is delusional.... :w00t:

How amusing considering you have yet to refute with evidence, the message I have conveyed. :whistle:

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#558    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:34 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:28 PM, said:

My years of expertise in NOTHING trumps that of these pure amatuers of science. <---Who does that sound like to you?? lol

Apparently, you failed to read the list of experts and companies that  have confirmed that fire was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings. Do I need to repost the list for you again?

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#559    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:46 PM

Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC Collapse

"The aircraft moved through the building as if it were a hot and fast lava flow," Sozen says. "Consequently, much of the fireproofing insulation was ripped off the structure. Even if all of the columns and girders had survived the impact - an unlikely event - the structure would fail as the result of a buckling of the columns. The heat from an ordinary office fire would suffice to soften and weaken the unprotected steel. Evaluation of the effects of the fire on the core column structure, with the insulation removed by the impact, showed that collapse would follow whatever the number of columns cut at the time of the impact."

There are  120,000 members of ASME(American Society of Mechanical Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 370,000 members of IEEE(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 40,000 members of AIChE(American Institute of Chemical Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are also 35,000 members of AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) who do not question the NIST report.

http://911-engineers.blogspot.com/

Edited by skyeagle409, 13 February 2013 - 05:48 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#560    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:53 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:30 PM, said:

They are not experts in the field of metallurgy ,,
Neither are you..but you don't have to be a expert in metallurgy to recognise a molten steel girder.......lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:08 PM, said:

which was evident in their comments in the absence of temperature readings at the level needed to melt steel.
You've got no counter evidence which shows what they saw anything other than steel, other than your opinions and so called expertise which both count for about 1 lira...lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#561    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:56 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:31 PM, said:

That doesn't work for you! :w00t:
It doesn't work for you either...yet you have fooled yourself it does......lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:08 PM, said:

Thank you!
No need to thank me, I don't deny evidence like molten steel...lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#562    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:57 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:32 PM, said:

How amusing considering you have yet to refute with evidence, the message I have conveyed. :whistle:
There is nothing to refute, your beliefs are faith based....not evidence based.

Thats why you believe that people who saw molten steel saw aluminium....lol

Hilarious debunking of the panto kind.....lol

Edited by Stundie, 13 February 2013 - 05:57 PM.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#563    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:59 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:53 PM, said:

Neither are you..but you don't have to be a expert in metallurgy to recognise a molten steel girder.......lol

I could show a piece of solidified alumnum and many  people will describe it as steel.

Quote

You've got no counter evidence which shows what they saw anything other than steel,...

In the absence of temperatures in the range to melt steel, the laws of physics comes in on the scene. :yes:

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#564    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:01 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:56 PM, said:

It doesn't work for you either..

Oh yes it does, and experts have backed me up as well. :yes: Look at that list. Even your own professor has confirmed that fire was responsible for the collapse of he WTC buildings, and that indicated that I was correct all along.

Edited by skyeagle409, 13 February 2013 - 06:03 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#565    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:02 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:

Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC Collapse

"The aircraft moved through the building as if it were a hot and fast lava flow," Sozen says. "Consequently, much of the fireproofing insulation was ripped off the structure. Even if all of the columns and girders had survived the impact - an unlikely event - the structure would fail as the result of a buckling of the columns. The heat from an ordinary office fire would suffice to soften and weaken the unprotected steel. Evaluation of the effects of the fire on the core column structure, with the insulation removed by the impact, showed that collapse would follow whatever the number of columns cut at the time of the impact."

There are  120,000 members of ASME(American Society of Mechanical Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 370,000 members of IEEE(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 40,000 members of AIChE(American Institute of Chemical Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are also 35,000 members of AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) who do not question the NIST report.

http://911-engineers.blogspot.com/
Sorry but they do not have as much expertise as me, therefore I win....lol  :w00t:

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#566    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:04 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:57 PM, said:

There is nothing to refute, your beliefs are faith based....not evidence based.

Well, did  your professor confirm that fire was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings?

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#567    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:08 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 06:02 PM, said:

Sorry but they do not have as much expertise as me, therefore I win....lol  :w00t:

A list of highly respected experts who use the laws of  physics to back up their conclusion that fire, not explosives, was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings. I might add that iron, which has been stored for many days, has  been known to create temperatures high enough to start fires, but I guess you didn't know that, and now, you know the rest of the story. :yes:

Let's take another look.

There are  120,000 members of ASME(American Society of Mechanical Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 370,000 members of IEEE(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 40,000 members of AIChE(American Institute of Chemical Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are also 35,000 members of AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics)who do not question the NIST report.

In other words, they see no problem with the official report.

Edited by skyeagle409, 13 February 2013 - 06:11 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#568    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,392 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:09 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 05:56 PM, said:

It doesn't work for you either...yet you have fooled yourself it does......lol
No need to thank me, I don't deny evidence like molten steel...lol
Impossible considering that temperatures were too low to melt steel.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#569    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:11 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:59 PM, said:

I could show a piece of solidified alumnum and many  people will describe it as steel.
I'm sure with hypnotic repeating of spamantra trolling with an overdose of delusions, you think you could convince many people that with your expertise, you could polish a turd into a diamond.
But you are fooling no one..lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 05:59 PM, said:

In the absence of temperatures in the range to melt steel, the laws of physics comes in on the scene. :yes:
In the absence of temperatures under the rubble, so there are no laws broken.

So either all the people who mentioned molten steel independently at different times at GZ are suffering from mass hallucination, or they actually saw molten steel.

The laws of physics says they didn't suffer from mass hallucinations. lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 06:04 PM, said:

Well, did  your professor confirm that fire was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings?
Did the professor confirm that he saw molten steel too?? ;) lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#570    monk 56

monk 56

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,012 posts
  • Joined:22 Aug 2012

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:11 PM

I have to support Skyeagle 409 all the way here, there isn't the evidence for this type of conspiracy, my own thoughts are that the United States Government knew that something was going to happen in New York and Washington DC on 9/11, although i don't think they knew it was going to be so awful.  Perhaps they didn't apply security as they should have, being a democracy they had to fire up voters, for the aim was to invade countries like Iraq that in the end was found to have nothing to do with 11th September 2001, politics can be crazy!