nopeda, on 10 January 2013 - 06:44 PM, said:
Since the question is how did they get built if humans could NOT have done it, yes it's hilarious in a pitiful sort of way. To think ancient humans might not have been able to do what no one today knows how they could have done doesn't mean they were idiots, nor that people today who don't know are idiots. Were you somehow, in some incredible way, unaware of that fact? If so, how could you have been???
No, you're right I have been pushing my own theory (ancient super-culture) over that of the theory being discussed (aliens did it).
Less of the insults would have been a pleasant aide-du-conversation though.
Aliens then.
Hmm, I always go back to "why". Why build PP (if the engineers are to be believed, the non-standard brickwork is designed to withstand earthquakes better)? I can understand a temporary locale - maybe the alien equivalent of a tent as they collect samples etc of the flora and fauna. Although I suppose they could have built an embassy, using local material but their own techniques and designs in order to be both non-threatening but also clearly saying "we're not from around here". It was certainly an important cultural hub according to archaeologists and anthropologists. As for why it's unfinished, perhaps they had to leave quickly (shades of War of the Worlds perhaps where the aliens were unable to resist the common diseases of mankind?).
But, if we assume visitation, should we not then assume it's visitation by the same extraterrestrial culture?
Therefore there should be a continuity of styles across the globe amongst places "touched by the gods". There isn't though, is there?
I can wrap my head around "why they came" though - it's the same reason we go to the Amazon now, to study and understand. Maybe out there there's a documentary by D'V'D Atten-Br-Ah about the people on Sol 3. But I can't understand why they left only stonework. If they were careful enough to pick up every piece of their technology etc, why not demolish their camp as well?