The rest of your post is pathitic. The more fur farms there are the less need to trap animals and maybe have the animal cheew it's own foot off or bleed to death.
As for your other statement, if a fur farm is widely available where someone would go to buy such a thing, then a clothing store will be available too where no animal has to die for their fur in the first place. Thus there's no "need". This would no longer be an issue about a lack of warm clothing, it's a fashion statement. As others have already indicated, alternatives to animal fur are available. And there'd be more of those if there were less fur farms.