I consider myself quite well versed in most subjects that involve UFO's and Atmospheric plasmas. Why do you ask?
And this is 'inconsistent' because you believe it should be the way you imagine? The truth is historically people do not tend to fire guns at UFO's.
I like to think Plasmas explain most 'unknown' UFO sightings. Of course that totally undermines your 'xenophobic' reply.
This thread is not about 'historic attitudes towards UFO sightings', it is about the alleged UFO involvement with missile shutdowns at US Military missile sites in March 1967. My posts have been consistent with this context.
Given that the UFO's in the topic are alleged to have actually materially interfered with electronic circuitry in hardened, underground, missile sites, would you still consider atmospheric plasmas to be the most likely explanation?
If not, would you like to venture the actual technology that would be able to effect such an event, whilst leaving no trace of it's use, and which the US Military was able to harden it's sites against with a simple upgrade to electronic circuitry in the late 1960's?
Edited by Leonardo, 03 July 2011 - 10:28 AM.