Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Time travel theory avoids grandfather paradox


  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

#76    Siara

Siara

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,427 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2006
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Maryland, USA

Posted 28 July 2010 - 05:18 PM

My understanding of relativity is that you can't reverse time, you can only change the pace at which it goes forward.  So the grandfather paradox could never arise.

My belief is that if we ever develop warp speed maybe we could send zillions of cameras focused on earth out in a massive shell around our planet.  If the cameras  had been transported faster than the speed of light and each one somehow represented a few pixels on a giant screen we could conceivably watch reruns of our history (the cameras would record images that happened before those cameras launched because they beat the light into space).  We will never be able to go back in time.

Yup, I know this is weird.

Edited by Siara, 28 July 2010 - 05:18 PM.


#77    sepulchrave

sepulchrave

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,792 posts
  • Joined:19 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 29 July 2010 - 01:34 AM

View PostSiara, on 28 July 2010 - 05:18 PM, said:

My understanding of relativity is that you can't reverse time, you can only change the pace at which it goes forward.  So the grandfather paradox could never arise.
That is through conventional space travel. General Relativity appears to allow the creation of wormholes, and there appears to be no difference between creating a wormhole to a different region of space and a wormhole to a different period in time (or, of course, a combination thereof).

Now obviously making a wormhole is currently impossible, and might always be impossible, since we'd need some very strange forms of exotic matter to build one.

However the mere possibility that a suitable arrangement of mass/energy could create a wormhole, and therefore allow time travel, gives theorists headaches trying to create a paradox-free Universe.

View PostSiara, on 28 July 2010 - 05:18 PM, said:

My belief is that if we ever develop warp speed maybe we could send zillions of cameras focused on earth out in a massive shell around our planet.  If the cameras  had been transported faster than the speed of light and each one somehow represented a few pixels on a giant screen we could conceivably watch reruns of our history (the cameras would record images that happened before those cameras launched because they beat the light into space).  We will never be able to go back in time.

Yup, I know this is weird.
If you can travel faster than the speed of light, you can travel back in time.


#78    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,144 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 29 July 2010 - 02:24 AM

i wish to point out that the ops fix for this paradox is to make rules.

I am a Mormon.  If I don't use Mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other Mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the Mormon faith. Thanks for caring and if you don't peace be with you.

#79    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 32,130 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 July 2010 - 03:29 AM

View Postaquatus1, on 26 July 2010 - 02:36 AM, said:

Well, no, that's just it.  The multiple universe idea is just another idea that is grounded in our innate desire to return to a linear timeline.  What I'm talking about is the third option of "We won't be able to logic it out."

What I am saying is that there may well be a paradox for us, because we are unlikely to be able to understand existence in the 4th dimension, whereas to someone in the 4th dimension, there is no more paradox to this than there is to us seeing the star within the circle.


Just hoping to see if I am understanding you post correctly.

Are you saying there is no point in speculating because we do not know what we are speculating about?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#80    The Silver Thong

The Silver Thong

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,258 posts
  • Joined:02 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary Alberta Canada

Posted 29 July 2010 - 03:33 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 29 July 2010 - 03:29 AM, said:

Just hoping to see if I am understanding you post correctly.

Are you saying there is no point in speculating because we do not know what we are speculating about?


I would have to go with that. We could speculate till the cows come home but in the end the debate will have not moved at all. Theorizing is one thing putting it into practical use seems a waste of time.

Sittin back drinkin beer watchin the world take it's course.


The only thing god can't do is prove he exists ?

#81    aquatus1

aquatus1

    Forum Divinity

  • 19,553 posts
  • Joined:05 Mar 2004
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 29 July 2010 - 03:38 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 29 July 2010 - 03:29 AM, said:

Just hoping to see if I am understanding you post correctly.

Are you saying there is no point in speculating because we do not know what we are speculating about?

Not at all.  Speculating is fun!  What I am saying is that one cannot assume the same rules apply from one dimension to another.  In the same way that the rules of the quantum universe do not apply to ours, our rules do not apply to that of the 4th dimension.  The Grandfather Paradox may seem like a paradox to us, but it may be no more a paradox to someone in the 4th dimension than Schrodinger's cat is to someone in the quantum world.


#82    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,144 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 29 July 2010 - 02:20 PM

View Postaquatus1, on 29 July 2010 - 03:38 AM, said:

Not at all.  Speculating is fun!  What I am saying is that one cannot assume the same rules apply from one dimension to another.  In the same way that the rules of the quantum universe do not apply to ours, our rules do not apply to that of the 4th dimension.  The Grandfather Paradox may seem like a paradox to us, but it may be no more a paradox to someone in the 4th dimension than Schrodinger's cat is to someone in the quantum world.
i think the rules of one spatial dimension applies to all spatial dimensions.


that being said, there could be rules/laws in the higher dimension that modify or negate lower dimensions.

I am a Mormon.  If I don't use Mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other Mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the Mormon faith. Thanks for caring and if you don't peace be with you.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users