Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Congress very low in Americans' esteem


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#31    RavenHawk

RavenHawk

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,889 posts
  • Joined:09 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 January 2013 - 11:21 PM

View PostCorp, on 11 January 2013 - 09:10 PM, said:

What if the incumbent does a good job?
Thank him for his service.

Quote

What if the person they're running against is clearly worst?
We could try setting up milestones and make recall easier as well as term limits.  The individual must show that he belongs.

Quote

Would you still give the incumbent the boot?
Absolutely.

Quote

Plus I would think having Congress not needing to answer to the public would only make things worst.
Who said Congress did not need to be answerable to the public?  Establish it so that each Congressman is answerable for his actions even long after his term is over.

Quote

Why bother being honest and working hard if you're just going to get fired at the end of your term?
This isn’t really a matter of being fired.  It’s a matter of doing well on your short watch.  All a man has is his honesty.

Quote

While career politicans are a problem making Congress a revolving door isn't much of a solution.
Well, it will cut out corporations spending millions on campaigns.  Congress should have never been anything but a revolving door.  Congress is about leadership, not profession.

Quote

And dreams change based on social changes.
Liberty and Freedom never change.

Quote

The dreams of a President's father would be much more appealing that some of the dreams of the Founding Fathers.
Really?  Have you read any of “Dreams of my Father”?  It’s pretty much a Socialist manifesto.

Quote

Can they provide guidance and some solid examples to follow, yes. Should that dream be followed to the letter? Not in this century.
If your core foundation is built on Liberty and Freedom then the dreams of our Founding Fathers are just as relevant now as they were then.  The Constitution remains timeless.

"I don't see one link on this thread providing one shred of evidence for the disgusting jew-hate BS you Zionist liars keep accusing me of." - Yamato

#32    RavenHawk

RavenHawk

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,889 posts
  • Joined:09 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 January 2013 - 11:22 PM

View PostHasina, on 11 January 2013 - 08:54 PM, said:

Understood, the GOP's not in the wrong in your view, it's all the other sides fault, you're being biased. I haven't pointed a finger at any one group, I'm trying to expand to you that it's just as much the GOP's fault as anyone else's.
That’s incorrect.  The GOP has just as much blame as the Socialists.  But you are absolutely right in that I am biased and blatantly so!  Socialism is something I utterly abhor.  And it gets the lion’s share of the blame on the basis of ideology.  Socialism is a poison to our Constitution.  It’s the people that should really get the blame for allowing it to get this far in the first place.  But who knew in 1913 that this would be the outcome?  Our nation is still just too young to learn from the past.  That is why Franklin was skeptical at us retaining a Republic.

Quote

The President is one man, anyone who thinks that he has some special power (other then executive orders which must be reviewed in three months time) is being silly. Checks and balances exist, this is why it takes forever to actually get things done.
Executive Orders are powerless.  EO’s are just another Fiscal Cliff.  These are just tactics by a wannabe dictator to misdirect and divide.  No one is obligated to follow an EO but the Administration is going forward, presenting an air of confidence as if that was the case.  That only works on the low-information voters.  And right now, those are in the Administration’s back pocket.

He has the charisma that all dictators had and he exerts that power over many.  With his charisma, ‘checks & balances’ are just temporary obstacles.  What has he really done that actually helps the people and the nation as opposed to what he has done to consolidate power?  Tarp was pretty much useless.  The Stimulus was a failure.  Obamacare only infringes on our rights far more than it helps the needy.  He was reelected despite his record.  This is just a recipe for the perfect storm.  This is how a nation falls into slavery and dictatorship.  So this is how liberty dies...with thunderous applause.

I've found that evil usually triumphs unless good is very, very careful.  Well, the GOP hasn’t been so careful.

"I don't see one link on this thread providing one shred of evidence for the disgusting jew-hate BS you Zionist liars keep accusing me of." - Yamato

#33    AquilaChrysaetos

AquilaChrysaetos

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 590 posts
  • Joined:01 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wherever the wind takes me...

  • "Some people wish to be the sun, so they can brighten your day. I wish to be the moon, which shines down upon you in your darkest hour."

Posted 12 January 2013 - 11:31 PM

Why does Nickelback have to be in the same catagory as traffic jams and cockroaches?... I happen to like Nickelback... :cry:

Jesus Christ - Matthew 28:18-20 said:

"All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."

Posted Image


#34    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,071 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:36 AM

View PostRavenHawk, on 12 January 2013 - 11:22 PM, said:

That's incorrect.  The GOP has just as much blame as the Socialists.  But you are absolutely right in that I am biased and blatantly so!  Socialism is something I utterly abhor.

To the point that you refuse to use your 401K?

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#35    RavenHawk

RavenHawk

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,889 posts
  • Joined:09 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 13 January 2013 - 07:18 PM

View Postquestionmark, on 13 January 2013 - 09:36 AM, said:

To the point that you refuse to use your 401K?
OK, you got my curiosity up.  What do you mean by that cryptic statement?

"I don't see one link on this thread providing one shred of evidence for the disgusting jew-hate BS you Zionist liars keep accusing me of." - Yamato

#36    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,071 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 13 January 2013 - 07:35 PM

View PostRavenHawk, on 13 January 2013 - 07:18 PM, said:

OK, you got my curiosity up.  What do you mean by that cryptic statement?

That was a demand of the Socialist International in 1905 so workers could build up capital by themselves.

Edit: If you can't find it look for the term collective capital formation.

Edited by questionmark, 13 January 2013 - 08:18 PM.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#37    RavenHawk

RavenHawk

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,889 posts
  • Joined:09 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 14 January 2013 - 03:56 PM

View Postquestionmark, on 13 January 2013 - 07:35 PM, said:

That was a demand of the Socialist International in 1905 so workers could build up capital by themselves.

Edit: If you can't find it look for the term collective capital formation.
Before you added your edit, I was looking at the Declaration of Principles of Socialist International.  I have of yet seen anything different.  I am googling things on “collective capital formation” but haven’t found anything specific although it’s clear it’s implied in there somewhere.

The idea of course sounds great but like all ideas, they are like a$$holes, everybody’s got one.  This is probably one of the key reasons Socialism doesn’t work.  You always see the idea pushed forward but never much on full implementation.  The bare facts about it is that, yes of course, the worker is allowed to build up capital on their own, but when it is needed by the State, the State will take it (for the common good) and you will have no say in the matter.

"I don't see one link on this thread providing one shred of evidence for the disgusting jew-hate BS you Zionist liars keep accusing me of." - Yamato

#38    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,071 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 14 January 2013 - 04:11 PM

View PostRavenHawk, on 14 January 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

Before you added your edit, I was looking at the Declaration of Principles of Socialist International.  I have of yet seen anything different.  I am googling things on "collective capital formation" but haven't found anything specific although it's clear it's implied in there somewhere.

The idea of course sounds great but like all ideas, they are like a$$holes, everybody's got one.  This is probably one of the key reasons Socialism doesn't work.  You always see the idea pushed forward but never much on full implementation.  The bare facts about it is that, yes of course, the worker is allowed to build up capital on their own, but when it is needed by the State, the State will take it (for the common good) and you will have no say in the matter.

As you said, so we have to conclude that social changes are not fueled by ideology but by necessity, and the necessity stems from where a society, as a whole, wants to go to: the next sensible step or extinction.

So, it does not help you to detest socialists, or communists or the Chinese, what you have a problem with is that society is not what it used to be 300 years ago. Well it is not, in fact it is not what it was 3000 years ago either. And it changed in accordance to its possibilities and means where each individual chooses the path that most becomes him. And the majority of individuals form the social norm.

You can detest all you want, the fact remains is that nothing is as persistent as change.

And if you look at the society now and the society 150 years ago  you will notice real fast that those things you call "socialistic" are but a reaction to the change in our lifestyle. And a reaction without which the end of our society would come real fast.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#39    RavenHawk

RavenHawk

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,889 posts
  • Joined:09 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:02 PM

View Postquestionmark, on 14 January 2013 - 04:11 PM, said:

As you said, so we have to conclude that social changes are not fueled by ideology but by necessity, and the necessity stems from where a society, as a whole, wants to go to: the next sensible step or extinction.

So, it does not help you to detest socialists, or communists or the Chinese, what you have a problem with is that society is not what it used to be 300 years ago. Well it is not, in fact it is not what it was 3000 years ago either. And it changed in accordance to its possibilities and means where each individual chooses the path that most becomes him. And the majority of individuals form the social norm.

You can detest all you want, the fact remains is that nothing is as persistent as change.

And if you look at the society now and the society 150 years ago  you will notice real fast that those things you call "socialistic" are but a reaction to the change in our lifestyle. And a reaction without which the end of our society would come real fast.
I don’t detest change.  That is one thing our Founding Fathers took into consideration and gave us a document that would work then, now and far into the future.  It was another step out of the Socialist quagmire.  The whole concept of Liberty and Freedom is timeless.  Yes, society must evolve but it must evolve forward.  Socialism is what existed 3000 years ago and we knew it as kingdoms.

The Ancient Greeks understood this and gave us the basic concept of Democracy, but they weren’t perfect.  The Romans picked up on this and advanced the ideology (12 Tablets) but they weren’t perfect.  The British added to it (Magna Carta) and now we continue on (Constitution) but we’re not perfect.  But we also have a chance to working out more kinks until we pass it on.  And one of the things we can do is say no to evolving backward into Socialism.

The current incarnation of Socialism is a poison and a curse plaguing Man.  It began its creep into the modern world in the 1870s and it got a foothold in this nation by 1913.  In order to fight that, we must be steadfast with the principles of the Constitution.  The enemies of Liberty and Freedom will say that’s clinging to the past but in reality, it is holding onto the future.

"I don't see one link on this thread providing one shred of evidence for the disgusting jew-hate BS you Zionist liars keep accusing me of." - Yamato

#40    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:12 PM

Im a direct decendent of one of the founding fathers of the America. His view on democracy was and I quote

Quote

The assistants then asserted their right to veto the general court's decision, sparking the controversy. Winthrop argued that the assistants, as experienced magistrates, must be able to check the democratic institution of the general court, because "a democracy is, amongst most civil nations, accounted the meanest and worst of all forms of government."

Although he was an avid Puritan his views and writing are still referenced today by many politicians today including JFK and Sarah Palin.


#41    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,071 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:15 PM

View PostRavenHawk, on 14 January 2013 - 05:02 PM, said:

I don't detest change.  That is one thing our Founding Fathers took into consideration and gave us a document that would work then, now and far into the future.  It was another step out of the Socialist quagmire.  The whole concept of Liberty and Freedom is timeless.  Yes, society must evolve but it must evolve forward.  Socialism is what existed 3000 years ago and we knew it as kingdoms.

The Ancient Greeks understood this and gave us the basic concept of Democracy, but they weren't perfect.  The Romans picked up on this and advanced the ideology (12 Tablets) but they weren't perfect.  The British added to it (Magna Carta) and now we continue on (Constitution) but we're not perfect.  But we also have a chance to working out more kinks until we pass it on.  And one of the things we can do is say no to evolving backward into Socialism.

The current incarnation of Socialism is a poison and a curse plaguing Man.  It began its creep into the modern world in the 1870s and it got a foothold in this nation by 1913.  In order to fight that, we must be steadfast with the principles of the Constitution.  The enemies of Liberty and Freedom will say that's clinging to the past but in reality, it is holding onto the future.

So, I guess you  live in a large multigenaration family to not need the "socialism"? Or, as in the case of the 401K you pick and choose what socialism is?

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#42    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:23 PM

Take away socialism in our government and see if these same people that complain about it can bear to watch children starve to death.


#43    Corp

Corp

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 6,950 posts
  • Joined:19 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:28 PM

So socialism, a political theory formed in the nineteenth century, was around three thousand years ago. Man we should fully support socialists. They have time machines!

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth a war, is much worse...A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

#44    RavenHawk

RavenHawk

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,889 posts
  • Joined:09 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:39 PM

View PostAsteroidX, on 14 January 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

Im a direct decendent of one of the founding fathers of the America. His view on democracy was and I quote
So am I.  So I guess I have an obligation to defend a legacy.  I just hope that my passion of Liberty and Freedom is just as strong.

Quote

Quote

The assistants then asserted their right to veto the general court's decision, sparking the controversy. Winthrop argued that the assistants, as experienced magistrates, must be able to check the democratic institution of the general court, because "a democracy is, amongst most civil nations, accounted the meanest and worst of all forms of government."

Although he was an avid Puritan his views and writing are still referenced today by many politicians today including JFK and Sarah Palin.
That’s why you won’t find “Democracy” in the Constitution.  Democracy in the extreme form is Socialism.  Even though we utilize democratic principles, we are a Constitutional Republic and not a Democracy.

Many of the Founding Fathers had similar views, just approached it from different experiences.  I like to quote these:

“…democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property. And have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”
James Madison  Essay #10, Federalist Papers

“We are a Republican Government, real liberty is never found in despotism or in the extremes of democracy.”
Alexander Hamilton

“Democracy never lasts long.  It soon exhausts and murders itself.”
Samuel Adams

"I don't see one link on this thread providing one shred of evidence for the disgusting jew-hate BS you Zionist liars keep accusing me of." - Yamato

#45    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:50 PM

Quote

So am I.  So I guess I have an obligation to defend a legacy.  I just hope that my passion of Liberty and Freedom is just as strong.

No but genetics are genetics. I understand better today where some of my core beliefs came from and why a good portion of my family migrated through the South for the Civil War then West. Federalization is not something I take kindly too. Never have never will and thats a personal opinion.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users