77 replies to this topic

[Persia]

Few historical events have received more attention or been more carefully reenacted than the assassination of President Kennedy.

http://www.foxnews.c...e#ixzz1eAXomLQi

[bubs49]

Persia, on 19 November 2011 - 04:23 PM, said:

Few historical events have received more attention or been more carefully reenacted than the assassination of President Kennedy.

http://www.foxnews.c...e#ixzz1eAXomLQi

The Warren Commission claimed that Oswald fired three shots in 5.6 seconds from the sixth floor window.
Now it's 11 seconds. Oh great, now everything adds up...

JFK official version build 7.8. In 2023 Oswald will have shot in 25 seconds and used an AK47 instead of a Mannlicher Carcano. But still no more than 3 shots...

Would be funny it weren't tragic.

[Little Fish]

the head shot is at 12 seconds in this video, so the first shot is at the 1 second mark?

[alienmojo]

And how can a bullet go thru President Kennedy, get deflected, and pass through Govenor Connoly without any damage to the bullet?  That's the biggest one for me that shows a conspiracy. Oswald wasn't a good enough shot to shoot those 3 shots in 6 seconds. Sorry. Also, if the doctors hadn't trach'ed Kennedy's throat and destroyed all evidence of the entry wound, which they say is an exit wound, then we would have known for sure.

[Metal Head]

More ridiculous garbage. When you get hit in the back of the head your head doesn't go toward the force. His head jerked backwards because he was hit in the front of the head, or side. How many times do you shoot an apple off a barrel and it flies off towards you? Ridiculous.

[DONTEATUS]

Its all a tale of our imaginations. 11 sec`s three shots ?  They must of slowed down to give Oswald a better target ? Dont you love new story tellers ?

[rusting]

I am not going to talk about the number of shots, the angle of shots, the angle of Kennedy's head movement or whether Oswald was skilled to take 3 shots in 1,5,11 or 25 seconds. I recently saw a video (i think it was here) which showed the secret service guys who were supposed to sit on the car's bonnet being called off...if that was true, then there is no way that Oswald would have acted alone

[Solar Absolution]

Oswald acted alone... What a load of tripe. I think they won't let sleeping dogs lay, because their modern lies would receive less scrutiny if something as silly and ridiculous as Oswald acting alone is accepted... "They" can sell us anything... Just an opinion...

[Matt Vinyl]

Just watching "The Kennedy Detail" at this very moment and the "calling off" is apparently because that particular agent (who appears to react to being called back) was supposed to be in the follow-up car, but kept going forward to protect the main car due to unexpected crowd sizes.

I don't think we will ever truly, really, 100% know... I have spent the last day or so reading all the related threads here, very interesting stuff..

[DONTEATUS]

This topic hits close to home for me I was 8 years old and they let all the schools out that dat from that day on Dallas has had a long road to recovery a very dark time in our history. But Its all in the way toy look at it !
I to this day feel that Oswald did Shoot alone ! We may never know though !

[Mike 215]

Look up The United States Select Committee on assassinations on google. The congressman studied the assassination and concluded there WAS A CONSPIRACY BECAUSE MORE THEN THREE SHOTS WERE FIRED! Unfortunately, the Justice Department at the time refused to make any arrests.

[Capt Snowflake]

Metal Head, on 20 November 2011 - 06:10 PM, said:

More ridiculous garbage. When you get hit in the back of the head your head doesn't go toward the force. His head jerked backwards because he was hit in the front of the head, or side. How many times do you shoot an apple off a barrel and it flies off towards you? Ridiculous.

Agreed, the headshot has to be coming in from his 2 o'clock angle or there abouts judging from video's.

[chainsawcam]

of course he acted alone, of course he did. Whatever!!

evidence suggests that he didn't, but if the powers say he did, then he did....

Jeeez, in fifty years time they'll be telling us that 911 was a MUslim attack on the USofA

[mapmaker]

exactly. only a fool or misinforation officer would attempt to pretend there was no conspiracy.  the key evidence the Senate Select Committee was able to bring to light was the audio tape, which clearly records more than three shots...  coming from more than one location.  well, there you go; more than one shooter, CONSPIRACY!

[Mike 215]

If you want to know who really gave the final order for the assassination
look up Madame Nhu on google and Amazon.com. Also look up Madame Nhu Kennedy Assassination on google.
  Unfortunately you are going to get the full truth about her on google or the hundreds of assassination books, I will give you some of the missing facts:
  Kennedy wanted her dead because she and her husband and brother in law, President Diem of South Vietnam were attacking the Buddhists who represented 90% of the population.  She was Catholic and represented only 10% of the population. Their monks burned themselves in the streets and she said, "I love these barbecues!"
Kennedy told the three of them to resign from office, but they refused so he order a coup on Nov.1, 1963 where Diem and Nhu were murdered, but she survived because she was in the US at the time. She immediatley ordered a press conference on LIVE TV she threatened to kill the president.This is three weeks before his death. You can read the transcript of her threats in the NOv. 3 edition of the NY Times, but you have go to library to read.
  She was the darling of the right wing in this country and her friends included Richard Nixon whose friend E. HOward Hunt (see google) admitted he was part of the asassination team. Nixon has been accused of being involved in the assassination and a few days after her newsconference he called and asked what he can do for her. You can imagine what she told him.
  An article in the Nov. 25 edition of the Times give the final proof she did it. In a condolence letter to Mrs. Kennedy she says, "'Indeed such a murder, where even the wounds inflicted on President Kennedy WERE IDENTICAL TO THOSE OF PRESIDENT DIEM, AND OF MY HUSBAND.." Her relatives were shot in the back of their heads with rifles. In her newsconference show promised revenge and that would include Kennedy getting shot in the head.
  All the books on the assassination have been censored where her name does not appear, yet the Warren commission said she was a suspect. In the history books dealing with the Vietnam War, they are also censored where they mention her but refuse to quote her newconference and her threat to kill the president.
  So why the cover up? How about the Catholic Church being involved and the Pope himself signing the order for the assassination. I can supply more evidence if anybody is interested.