Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * - - - 4 votes

911 inside job - for what?


  • Please log in to reply
4446 replies to this topic

#1456    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:23 AM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 12:16 AM, said:

When we look at the source of the dripping metal, then the temperature is clearly white hot and therefore steel then??

Shows how much you don't know. It is very clear from the chart  when used in conjunction with the photos is that the molten metal is aluminum, not steel. The fact that WTC2 began to bow underlines my point that the molten metal is aluminum, not steel.

So once again, where is your evidence?

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 12:24 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1457    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,555 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:37 AM

I just zoomeed

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 12:23 AM, said:

Shows how much you don't know. It is very clear from the chart  when used in conjunction with the photos is that the molten metal is aluminum, not steel. The fact that WTC2 began to bow underlines my point that the molten metal is aluminum, not steel.

So once again, where is your evidence?
I just zoomed in using paint to look at the colour and the source of the molten metal is glowing white hot, so over 1200c.

Seeing as molten aluminium doesn't really glow and loses it's heat quickly and is also very watery in appearance at this high temperature, it would appear to be steel.

But seeing as only a metallurgist can make that call, we will never know...lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1458    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 03:21 AM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 12:37 AM, said:

I just zoomeed
I just zoomed in using paint to look at the colour and the source of the molten metal is glowing white hot, so over 1200c.

Let's take another look.

Posted Image

Now, compare using the chart.

Posted Image

Consider that since the molten aluminum is flowing from within WTC2, chances are that it is mixed with other materials. That can't be molten steel because the building is still standing and would have collapsed long before reaching the melting point of steel and I might add, there are no steel columns being cut in that photo.

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 03:22 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1459    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:34 AM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 12:37 AM, said:

But seeing as only a metallurgist can make that call, we will never know..

Apparently, the silvery aluminum droplets says it all. Observe the silvery droplets.


Posted Image

If you are going to doctor a similar photo in the future, at least make sure that you retouched the droplets, not the liquid flow. You are not paying attention because what did I say about molten aluminum flowing over and mixing with other materials such as furnishings within WTC2?

Nothing like adding a bit of color to the molten metal mix, you understand. You wouldn't have noticed because you are not a metallurgist. Now, to carry on.


More on Aluminum Seen from the North side of WTC 2

Release of the molten material (possibly aluminum) that began pouring from window 80-255 on the north side of the 80th floor at 9:51:51 am provides evidence for the extensive heating that had taken place from the fire that had been burning in the area for nearly 50 min. The melting point range for the relevant aluminum alloys varies from 475C to 635C, and a great deal of heat would have been required to melt the large volume of liquid metal observed pouring from the tower. The sudden appearance of the flow at the top of the window was likely the result of the formation of a pathway from the 81st floor where the aluminum possibly had pooled on top of the floor slab as it melted. This, in turn suggests that the 81st floor slab possibly sank down or pulled away from the spandrel at this time.

During the 7 min between when the flow of molten metal was first observed and the tower collapsed, the amount of material flowing from the 80th floor increased and decreased repeatedly. At one point the flow shifted from window 80-255 to window 80-256. The change in the source window for the liquid suggests that the lowest local point with pooled aluminum somehow moved to the east. These observations suggest that the 81st floor slab in the immediate vicinity was possibly shifting almost continuously during this time, and in the process, spilling more and more of the pooled liquid. A similar release of liquid occurred from window 78-238 on the 78th floor around 9:27. It is possible that this material came from the pile of debris immediately above on the 79th floor. Since this flow was only observed for a few seconds, it is not appropriate to speculate further concerning its source.

pg 412,413,114 chap 9

http://wtc.nist.gov/...hap_9-AppxC.pdf

NIST pg 43 Section H.9 App H Vol 4

Starting at around 9:52 a.m. a molten material began to pour from the top of the window 80-256 on the North face of WTC 2. The material appears intermittently until the tower collapses at 9:58:59. The observation of piles of debris in this area combined with the melting point behaviors of the primary alloys used in a Boeing 767 suggest that the material is molten aluminum derived from aircraft debris located on floor 81.

Molten Material

It has been reported in the FEMA report (McAllister 2002) as well as in the media that what appeared to be molten metal was observed pouring from the north face near the northeast corner. This is the area where the sustained fires were seen. Video records and photography indicate that the material first appeared at 9:51:52 am and continued to pour intermittently from the building until the time of the collapse. Some of that material can be seen falling in Fig. H-21. Close up video and photographs of the area where the material is pouring from have been examined and show that it is falling from near the top of window 80-256. The most likely explanation for this observation is that the material had originally pooled on the floor above, that is 81, and that it was allowed to pour out of the building when this floor either pulled away from the outer spandrel or sank down to the point where the window was exposed. The fact that the material appears intermittently over a several minute period suggests that the floor was giving way bit by bit

http://wtc.nist.gov/...4/appendixh.pdf

The composition of the flowing material can only be the subject of speculation, but its behavior is consistent with it being molten aluminum. Visual evidence suggest that a significant wreckage from the plane passed thought the building and came to rest in the northeast corner of the tower in the vicinity of the location where the material is observed.
Much of the structure of the Boeing 767 is formed from two aluminum alloys that have been identified as 2024 and 7075 closely related alloys. These alloys do not melt at a single temp, but melt over a temp range from the lower end of the range to the upper as the fraction of the liquid increases. The Aluminum association handbook lists the melting point as roughly 500C to 638 C and 475 C to 635C for alloys 2024 and 7075 respectively. These temperatures are well below those characteristic of fully developed fires (ca 1000C ) and any aluminum present is likely to be at least partially melted by the intense fires in the area.

http://www.scieneeri...wtc_update.html

The NY Times article

Last spring, the standards institute found the first photographic evidence on the east face of the south tower that a single floor — with its lightweight support system, called a truss — had sagged in the minutes before it started collapsing. Now, detailed analysis of photos and videos has revealed at least three more sagging floors on that face, said William Pitts, a researcher at the institute's Building and Fire Research Laboratory.

In addition, Dr. Pitts said, sudden expansions of the fires across whole floors in each tower shortly before they fell suggested internal collapses — burning floors above suddenly giving way and spreading the blaze below.
Finally, an unexplained cascade of molten metal from the northeast corner of the south tower just before it collapsed might have started when a floor carrying pieces of one of the jetliners began to sag and fail. The metal was probably molten aluminum from the plane and could have come through the top of an 80th floor window as the floor above gave way, Dr. Pitts said.

"That's probably why it poured out — simply because it was dumped there," Dr. Pitts said. "The structural people really need to look at this carefully."

http://www.nytimes.c...874000&adxnnl=1

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 05:37 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1460    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,555 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:44 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 03:21 AM, said:

Let's take another look.
Yes lets take another look now I remembered how to post attachments...lol


Posted Image

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 03:21 AM, said:

Now, compare using the chart.

Posted Image
Look at the attachments I've posted.

This is from the image you have posted above and all I have done is zoomed in using paint. It has not been doctored.
Attached File  blwonup3.png   11.31K   0 downloadsThat one would indicate temperatures of 1200c

Now take a look at this is from the other photo you posted and the original one I looked at. Again, all I have done is zoomed in using paint and I've not doctored it.
Attached File  Blownup.png   3.3K   0 downloadsWhat temperature does that one indicate? Again, feel free to take a look yourself if you are in any doubt about the authenticity.

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 03:21 AM, said:

Consider that since the molten aluminum is flowing from within WTC2, chances are that it is mixed with other materials.
It doesn't mix with other materials. Showing you how little you have been paying attention.


View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 03:21 AM, said:

That can't be molten steel because the building is still standing and would have collapsed long before reaching the melting point of steel and I might add, there are no steel columns being cut in that photo.
What a silly Skyeagle.... :wacko:

Of course it can be molten steel, what an absurd argument that if it was molten steel, the building would collapse. And here you are claiming to be smart while making a seriously dumb argument. Just because that particular part of the steel is being melted, doesn't mean the towers would collapse like a house of cards. There will be plenty of load paths more than capable of bearing the load from the relatively small area where the steel is melting.

It doesn't flow like molten aluminium which at these temperatures would be watery and would cool down a lot quicker.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1461    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,555 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:51 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:34 AM, said:

Apparently, the silvery aluminum droplets says it all. Observe the silvery droplets.


Posted Image
Those droplets are glowing nice and orange and are not silvery....lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:34 AM, said:

If you are going to doctor a similar photo in the future, at least make sure that you retouched the droplets, not the liquid flow.
I've not doctored anything...lol I'll show you in the next post of me zooming in gradually...lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:34 AM, said:

You are not paying attention because what did I say about molten aluminum flowing over and mixing with other materials such as furnishings within WTC2?
You are not paying attention, what happens in the video when the man from the NIST tries to mix other materials with the aluminium. lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:34 AM, said:

Nothing like adding a bit of color to the molten metal mix, you understand. You wouldn't have noticed because you are not a metallurgist. Now, to carry on.
And neither are you, otherwise you would have realised that the video shows clearly that organic materials such as furniture and carpet doesn't mix with aluminium or create aluminium capable of glowing that brightly during daylight conditions. lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:34 AM, said:

More on Aluminum Seen from the North side of WTC 2

Release of the molten material (possibly aluminum) that began pouring from window 80-255 on the north side of the 80th floor at 9:51:51 am provides evidence for the extensive heating that had taken place from the fire that had been burning in the area for nearly 50 min. The melting point range for the relevant aluminum alloys varies from 475C to 635C, and a great deal of heat would have been required to melt the large volume of liquid metal observed pouring from the tower. The sudden appearance of the flow at the top of the window was likely the result of the formation of a pathway from the 81st floor where the aluminum possibly had pooled on top of the floor slab as it melted. This, in turn suggests that the 81st floor slab possibly sank down or pulled away from the spandrel at this time.

During the 7 min between when the flow of molten metal was first observed and the tower collapsed, the amount of material flowing from the 80th floor increased and decreased repeatedly. At one point the flow shifted from window 80-255 to window 80-256. The change in the source window for the liquid suggests that the lowest local point with pooled aluminum somehow moved to the east. These observations suggest that the 81st floor slab in the immediate vicinity was possibly shifting almost continuously during this time, and in the process, spilling more and more of the pooled liquid. A similar release of liquid occurred from window 78-238 on the 78th floor around 9:27. It is possible that this material came from the pile of debris immediately above on the 79th floor. Since this flow was only observed for a few seconds, it is not appropriate to speculate further concerning its source.

pg 412,413,114 chap 9

http://wtc.nist.gov/...hap_9-AppxC.pdf

NIST pg 43 Section H.9 App H Vol 4

Starting at around 9:52 a.m. a molten material began to pour from the top of the window 80-256 on the North face of WTC 2. The material appears intermittently until the tower collapses at 9:58:59. The observation of piles of debris in this area combined with the melting point behaviors of the primary alloys used in a Boeing 767 suggest that the material is molten aluminum derived from aircraft debris located on floor 81.

Molten Material

It has been reported in the FEMA report (McAllister 2002) as well as in the media that what appeared to be molten metal was observed pouring from the north face near the northeast corner. This is the area where the sustained fires were seen. Video records and photography indicate that the material first appeared at 9:51:52 am and continued to pour intermittently from the building until the time of the collapse. Some of that material can be seen falling in Fig. H-21. Close up video and photographs of the area where the material is pouring from have been examined and show that it is falling from near the top of window 80-256. The most likely explanation for this observation is that the material had originally pooled on the floor above, that is 81, and that it was allowed to pour out of the building when this floor either pulled away from the outer spandrel or sank down to the point where the window was exposed. The fact that the material appears intermittently over a several minute period suggests that the floor was giving way bit by bit

http://wtc.nist.gov/...4/appendixh.pdf

The composition of the flowing material can only be the subject of speculation, but its behavior is consistent with it being molten aluminum. Visual evidence suggest that a significant wreckage from the plane passed thought the building and came to rest in the northeast corner of the tower in the vicinity of the location where the material is observed.
Much of the structure of the Boeing 767 is formed from two aluminum alloys that have been identified as 2024 and 7075 closely related alloys. These alloys do not melt at a single temp, but melt over a temp range from the lower end of the range to the upper as the fraction of the liquid increases. The Aluminum association handbook lists the melting point as roughly 500C to 638 C and 475 C to 635C for alloys 2024 and 7075 respectively. These temperatures are well below those characteristic of fully developed fires (ca 1000C ) and any aluminum present is likely to be at least partially melted by the intense fires in the area.

http://www.scieneeri...wtc_update.html

The NY Times article

Last spring, the standards institute found the first photographic evidence on the east face of the south tower that a single floor — with its lightweight support system, called a truss — had sagged in the minutes before it started collapsing. Now, detailed analysis of photos and videos has revealed at least three more sagging floors on that face, said William Pitts, a researcher at the institute's Building and Fire Research Laboratory.

In addition, Dr. Pitts said, sudden expansions of the fires across whole floors in each tower shortly before they fell suggested internal collapses — burning floors above suddenly giving way and spreading the blaze below.
Finally, an unexplained cascade of molten metal from the northeast corner of the south tower just before it collapsed might have started when a floor carrying pieces of one of the jetliners began to sag and fail. The metal was probably molten aluminum from the plane and could have come through the top of an 80th floor window as the floor above gave way, Dr. Pitts said.

"That's probably why it poured out — simply because it was dumped there," Dr. Pitts said. "The structural people really need to look at this carefully."

http://www.nytimes.c...874000&adxnnl=1
Sorry but according to your own logic, none of these are metallurgists and therefor not qualified to make the judgement.

And if the NIST can't create the dayglow aluminium, then they really do not have a case do they?? lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1462    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,555 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:10 AM

Here is a still taken from a youtube clip.
Posted Image
Here it is zoomed in slightly...
Attached File  wtc2zoom1.png   35.75K   1 downloads
And again....
Attached File  wtc2zoom2.png   7.96K   3 downloads
and one last time..
Attached File  wtc2zoom3.png   5.42K   5 downloads
Now lets stretch it so we can look at the colour....
Attached File  wtc2stretched.png   10.28K   6 downloads

So what colours can you see there??

Posted Image

I see temperatures of 1200C plus...lol

I'm sure if I had a better paint package on my computer, I could do a better job it's quick and simple analysis...lol

Attached Files


Edited by Stundie, 27 March 2013 - 09:13 AM.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1463    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:06 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 08:44 AM, said:

Of course it can be molten steel, ...

Impossible. One, because the droplets are not from molten steel, and two, the buildings is still standing, and three, that is where the airframe of United 175 was exposed to tempetures high enough to melt aluminum, but not steel. So once again, you have no case.

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 09:10 AM, said:

Here is a still taken from a youtube clip.
Posted Image
Here it is zoomed in slightly...
Attachment wtc2zoom1.png
And again....
Attachment wtc2zoom2.png
and one last time..
Attachment wtc2zoom3.png
Now lets stretch it so we can look at the colour....
Attachment wtc2stretched.png

So what colours can you see there??

Posted Image

I see temperatures of 1200C plus...lol

I'm sure if I had a better paint package on my computer, I could do a better job it's quick and simple analysis...

Where's your evidence that the molten flow is steel? I can answer that for you. You have no evidence.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1464    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:08 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 08:51 AM, said:

Those droplets are glowing nice and orange and are not silvery....

On the contrary, they are. It goes to show that you are attempting to mislead the readers and the proof lies in the content of what you have posted.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1465    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:12 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 09:10 AM, said:

I'm sure if I had a better paint package on my computer, I could do a better job it's quick and simple analysis...

What you have just said does not constitute evidence by any  means. Fact of the matter is, the molten flow is not molten steel at all and another reason why it is not molten steel is because there is nothing on  that floor that can generate molten steel.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1466    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:19 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 08:51 AM, said:

Those droplets are glowing nice and orange and are not silvery....

Let's take another look.


Posted Image

Apparently, the droplets on the lower portion of the photo are in fact, silvery, which once again, exposed your attempt to mislead readers.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1467    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,555 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:26 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

Impossible. One, because the droplets are not from molten steel, and two, the buildings is still standing, and three, that is where the airframe of United 175 was exposed to tempetures high enough to melt aluminum, but not steel. So once again, you have no case.
Here we go with your ridiculous assertions which makes a mockery of your so called intelligence..lol

The building would still be standing if the molten metal is steel. The WTC would not collapsed by cutting a few steel beams because there is still an entire undamaged structure supporting the rest of the load.

You have posted the colour chart and the temperatures were higher than 1200c.

So therefore it could well be molten steel as it looks like a closer comparison than aluminium...lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

Where's your evidence that the molten flow is steel? I can answer that for you. You have no evidence.
I have the same amount of evidence as you that it was molten aluminium except...
  • It looks nothing like aluminium because it's glowing hot during in daytime conditions. Something which aluminium doesn't tend to do.
  • Aluminium loses its heat very quickly and this stuff pours out for many floors before cooling down.
  • That the NIST couldn't recreate the dayglow orange molten aluminium and failed when they tried to mix it with other stuff.
  • Aluminium is more watery at those temperatures and the stuff coming from the source is a thicker substance.

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:19 PM, said:

Let's take another look.


Posted Image

Apparently, the droplets on the lower portion of the photo are in fact, silvery, which once again, exposed your attempt to mislead readers.
What silvery droplets, they are glowing orange......lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1468    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,555 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:30 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:12 PM, said:

What you have just said does not constitute evidence by any  means.
No it is not evidence, it was a simple analysis which effectively shows that the temperatures were much higher than 1200c and therefore it could be much hotter and therefore molten steel.

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:12 PM, said:

Fact of the matter is, the molten flow is not molten steel at all and another reason why it is not molten steel is because there is nothing on  that floor that can generate molten steel.
fact of the matter is, it looks and behaves nothing like aluminium.

There is nothing on that floor that should be able to generate temperatures over 1200C, but it's there.....

So is there something there which shouldn't be there?? lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1469    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:32 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:26 PM, said:

Here we go with your ridiculous assertions which makes a mockery of your so called intelligence..

Actually, you got caught trying to mislead readers. You made a false claim which is why I posted that photo to expose your misleading attempts.

Quote

The building would still be standing if the molten metal is steel.

Let's see about that. Molten steel can support a tall building. Ok, I got your number. Another attempt on  your part at deception.

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:30 PM, said:

No it is not evidence, i

You did have evidence in the first place. No evidence of bombs simply means you have no case.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1470    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,122 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:38 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:30 PM, said:

There is nothing on that floor that should be able to generate temperatures over 1200C, but it's there....

You got caught again in trying to mislead people. Temperatures are in fact, high enough to melt aluminum as noted in reports that the building began to buckle, which is an indication that temperatures did in fact, exceed the the melting point of aluminum.

Once again, you have  not been paying attention, so here it is again.


WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory

Indications of the Imminent Collapse
of the World Trade Center Buildings
Disprove Explosives Theory


Scientists investigating the Sept. 11, 2001 collapse of the twin towers said, "the World Trade Center towers showed telltale signs they were about to collapse several minutes before each crumbled to the ground." There would not be telltale signs if it was explosives (Controlled Demolition) that caused the buildings to collapse.

"In the case of the north tower, police chopper pilots reported seeing the warning signs - an inward bowing of the building facade - at least eight minutes before it collapsed at 10:29 a.m." New York Daily News reporter Paul Shin wrote in his June 19th, 2004 article 9/11 cops saw collapse coming.


NYC Police Saw Sign of Tower Collapse, Study Says (Update2)

June 18 (Bloomberg) -- Federal engineering investigators studying the destruction of the World Trade Center's twin towers on Sept. 11 said New York Police Department aviation units reported an inward bowing of the buildings' columns in the minutes before they collapsed, a signal they were about to fall.

http://www.bloomberg...=top_world_news

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So once again, you have been proven wrong.

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 04:39 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users