Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 6 votes

WTC 911 EyeWitness~Hoboken


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3683 replies to this topic

#526    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:13 PM

View PostBelial, on 13 February 2013 - 11:33 AM, said:

I actually forgot just how many experts live here.
Just for the record...I do not claim to be an expert. :)

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#527    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:29 PM

experts explain, trolls and idiots merely assert, ignore and deny.

here is something that needs an explanation

Posted Image
Posted Image

Edited by Little Fish, 13 February 2013 - 12:31 PM.


#528    Scepticus

Scepticus

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 247 posts
  • Joined:22 Sep 2011

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:37 PM

View PostLittle Fish, on 13 February 2013 - 12:29 PM, said:

experts explain, trolls and idiots merely assert, ignore and deny.

here is something that needs an explanation

Posted Image
Posted Image

What exactly do you need explained? As it says the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms had firearms in building six.
Also the FBI had an office in the north tower, so cant really see why it would be a surprise to find guns at ground zero.

:D

The only way to get smarter is by playing a smarter opponent.

#529    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:53 PM

It is a disgrace to this site that there are 9/11 "troothers" around. These dimwits should stay at their conspiracy sites.

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#530    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 8,506 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:53 PM

View Postfrenat, on 12 February 2013 - 11:44 PM, said:

I said NOTHING about the passenger or victims list.  Try to stay on topic please.  But since you mentioned it, since the lists released by the AIRLINES (note, not the FBI which I was talking about) were ALWAYS listed as VICTIMS lists and the manifests weren't released until the trial, what is the problem?  Is it that you like to be wrong?



Prove it.  Find ONE article released after the official list of hijackers was released on the 27th of September that says there are some still alive.  I'll bet you can't and won't even try.  Perhaps you should try to actually READ the link I provided.



Those were covered fine by others.  You have NOT proved they were impossible.  I was also commenting on what I have knowledge of.  Would you prefer I speculate wildly on subjects I know little about?  I'd just end up looking like you then.



Prove the maneuver was impossible.  I'll bet you can't.

I was referring to your post #436 in which you mentioned, regarding the hijackers identities, "...final list with pictures was released".  I was commenting on the editing and evolution of the various lists, passengers, victims, hijackers, whatever, that happened.  First passenger lists, derived from airline passenger manifests, did not include the hijackers, were then called 'victim list' to distinguish the artificial difference.  The story is the hoax, not the events.

Tortured logic is required to make the OCT even begin to fit the facts.

Here Frenat, for the umpteenth time, I will explain my position on the so-called Hani Maneuver.

Given the right airplane and pilot combination, and a number of practice sessions, the maneuver itself is certainly POSSIBLE.

What makes it IMPOSSIBLE is the combination of the following: a rookie pilot with a very bad reputation amongst flight instructors, out of a Cessna and into a Boeing for the FIRST TIME IN HIS LIFE (and that is something a nonpilot cannot fully appreciate), completing it successfully and perfectly on his first try.

You may buy into that fairy tale Frenat, but I cannot.


#531    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:05 PM

Maddox pretty much nailed the 9/11 troother crapola way back then:

http://www.thebestpa...gi?u=911_morons

Nothing to add, really.

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#532    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:28 PM

View PostScepticus, on 13 February 2013 - 01:37 PM, said:

What exactly do you need explained? As it says the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms had firearms in building six.
Also the FBI had an office in the north tower, so cant really see why it would be a surprise to find guns at ground zero.

:D
are you twelve years old or something?


#533    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,101 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:39 PM

View PostLittle Fish, on 13 February 2013 - 12:29 PM, said:

experts explain, trolls and idiots merely assert, ignore and deny.

here is something that needs an explanation

Posted Image
Posted Image

Look at that picture and tell us what is wrong.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#534    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,101 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 10:52 AM, said:

Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl is a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. He specializes in studying structural damage done by earthquakes and terrorist bombings.
Posted Image
“I saw melting of girders in [the] World Trade Center.”


I might add that the photo does not depict a melting girder and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out. :no: There are no signs that piece of steel was ever in a molten state.

Quote

Leslie Robertson, one of the structural engineers responsible for the design of the WTC, describes fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks.

He did not see any running molten steel. :no: As noted in the temperature readings, the temperatures never reached the level to melt steel. What did I post the other day in regards to fires that continue smolder for days? What have I said about exothermic reactions of iron?

If they claim that molten steel was found, then they are not experts in the field of metals because the temperatures never reached the level to melt steel and it doesn't take an expert to figure that out, just plain old common sense. :yes:

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#535    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,101 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:06 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 10:52 AM, said:

Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl is a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. He specializes in studying structural damage done by earthquakes and terrorist bombings.

And, he has said that fires, not explosives, were responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings.

Quote

Sorry but were the girders made of Aluminium? :blink:

Let's put it this way, the WTC buildings were covered with aluminum. I credit Czeros 101 for posting this in an earlier post.

Quote

   Posted Image

South tower of the World Trade Center
The highly reflective aluminum sheathing of the Twin Towers added to the building’s impact as a memorable landmark.

Posted Image

Posted Image
Aluminum cladding
Rough-sorted aluminum cladding from the World Trade Center at the Staten Island recovery site.

http://amhistory.si....cord.asp?ID=104

In addition:

Quote

Posted Image
Posted Image

World Trade Center structural joint

Description: This damaged structural bracket from the World Trade Center was recovered from the debris pile.

Context: This viscoelastic damper connected a floor truss to an exterior steel column of the World Trade Center. Building movement caused by wind was a major concern to the architects and engineers designing the 110-story towers. They cleverly mitigated apparent building movement by using these dampers to allow the exterior of the building to sway slightly under wind load, while the floor remained largely stationary.

The damper and other floor attachment brackets were also a point of failure leading to the towers' collapse. When the intense fire heated the 60 foot-long floor trusses, they eventually distorted and pulled free of their attachments to the exterior columns. As the upper floors of the towers fell, the weight then “pancaked” the lower floors, breaking floor truss attachments unaffected by heat.

What have I said before in that regard?! I've  provided hints and answers as I described the specifics of aerodynamic heating related to the airframe of the SR-71.

Edited by skyeagle409, 13 February 2013 - 04:52 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#536    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,101 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:09 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 10:55 AM, said:

On another note...Here is what happened when the NIST tried to recreate their molten aluminium..... :w00t: ....lol

Another fail for Skyeagle and his wacky Aluminium theories.

What does the silvery color of aluminum indicate? Look at the color chart of aluminum  and what is it that you don't see and why?

Aluminum

Posted Image

Posted Image


Posted ImagePosted Image




Posted Image



Edited by skyeagle409, 13 February 2013 - 04:19 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#537    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,101 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:38 PM

View PostStundie, on 13 February 2013 - 10:33 AM, said:

I think you have taken panto debunking to new heights and are trying to turn into theatrical debunking.

911 conspiracist do a good job of debunking themselves. For an example, some have said that thermite was the reason why there is molten steel, but there is no molten steel and if they checked records, they would have found that it is not uncommon for fires to smolder for days.

Quote

Fire at Yuma-area packing shed to smolder for days

YUMA, AZ (AP) -A fire that destroyed a group of produce packing sheds east of Yuma is expected to smolder for days as piles of burned cardboard cools and foam building insulation continues to send up smoke.

http://www.kpho.com/...molder-for-days

Queensbury warehouse fire still smoldering two days after start

Read more: http://www.timesunio...p#ixzz2KnTqftoR


Fire Expected to Smolder for Days at Nebraska Carpet Padding Warehouse

A fire caused an estimated $5 million damage to a carpet padding warehouse early Wednesday and residents were told to expect a considerable amount of smoke as the fire continued to burn and smolder.


http://www.firehouse...dding-warehouse

Quote

I will let you know a secret, considering the construction of the WTC buildings, there is no way comparitively small fires could have demolished those buildings.

I will let you in on another secret, it was obvious the fires within the WTC buildings were not small. :no:

Quote

The Investigation

The American Society of Civil Engineers and FEMA conducted an in-depth investigation of the World Trade Center. The team members included the director of the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers, the senior fire investigator for the National Fire Protection Association, professors of fire safety, and leaders of some of the top building design and engineering firms, including Skidmore Owings & Merrill in Chicago, Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire in Seattle, and Greenhorne & O'Mara in Maryland.

It concluded that massive structural damage caused by the crashing of the aircrafts into the buildings, combined with the subsequent fires, were sufficient to induce the collapse of both structures.

Now, what have I been saying all along?

Quote

Trust me, I have more than 40 years experience and knowledge than you.
Show us the buckling of the WTC building that is clearly evidence on video?? lol

OK!



Quote

So if I planted explosives on the 1st floor, they would have detonated when the plane impacted 90 floors above it?? lol

Ever heard of secondary explosions? :w00t:

Edited by skyeagle409, 13 February 2013 - 04:56 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#538    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:48 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM, said:

I might add that the photo does not depict a melting girder and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out. :no:
hahahahaha!! Here we go round the delusional roundabout! hahahahaha!!

Did I ever say or indicate there was a melting girder in the picture?

I was showing you a picture him examining some steel to show that unlike you, he has witnessed the steel firsthand and not sitting being his computer being an internet warrior on debunking pantomime mission.

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM, said:

There are no signs that piece of steel was ever in a molten state.
And I never claimed it was in a molten state.

Your strawman burns with ease......lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM, said:

He did not see any running molten steel. :no:
I think I'll take the word of an expert on the scene rather than some internet debunking warrior whose think his googling skills equate to 40 years of experience, in something or another.

He saw molten steel.....stop crying about it, you are wrong.......lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM, said:

As noted in the temperature readings, the temperatures never reached the level to melt steel.
The temperature under the rubble was never measured and there was molten steel. lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM, said:

What did I post the other day in regards to fires that continue smolder for days?
I aint got a clue and neither do I care......lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM, said:

What have I said about exothermic reactions of iron?
So now there were exothermic reactions?? lol This is a new one! Does that mean there was molten steel then after all?? :blink:

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 03:50 PM, said:

If they claim that molten steel was found, then they are not experts in the field of metals because the temperatures never reached the level to melt steel and it doesn't take an expert to figure that out, just plain old common sense. :yes:
Common sense says that if an expert at GZ says that he saw molten girder/evaporated steel, he didn't see it because an internet warrior thinks he knows better and it discredits his expertise. hahahahahaha!!!

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#539    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:52 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

And, he has said that fires, not explosives, were responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings.
He did, but he also said he saw molten steel too.

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

Let's put it this way, the WTC buildings were covered with aluminum.
And I never said they were not covered in Aluminium....lol

You are the king of strawmen. lol

However, metal girders are not aluminium.....do you understand the difference? lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

I credit Czeros 101 for posting this in an earlier post.
I don't think Czeros is happy with him being associated with your strawman.

Pure pantomime debunking.....lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#540    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:55 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 13 February 2013 - 04:09 PM, said:

What does the silvery color of aluminum indicate? Look at the color chart of aluminum  and what is it that you don't see and why?

Aluminum

Posted Image

Posted Image


Posted ImagePosted Image




Posted Image


Funny isn't it, in all those pictures you have found aluminium to be glowing red hot, every single one of them has a dark background or are photos taken indoors.

None of them glowing bright in daylight conditions like the stuff pouring out of WTC2. lol

Edited by Stundie, 13 February 2013 - 04:58 PM.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.