Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Voynich manuscript has 'genuine message'


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

#31    HawkLord

HawkLord

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 338 posts
  • Joined:16 May 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Adelaide. South Australia

  • I reserve the right to change my mind when better and more accurate info becomes available.

Posted 27 June 2013 - 07:55 PM

I read somewhere ( maybe here as I cant quite remember where) that it might be some form of alchemical codex. I look forward to more information.

The rocks in my head fill the holes in yours.

It is easy to spout the wisdom of others when you have none of your own.

Insult me all you like but remember that i have a sword.

#32    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,611 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 27 June 2013 - 07:58 PM

View PostHawkLord, on 27 June 2013 - 07:55 PM, said:

I read somewhere ( maybe here as I cant quite remember where) that it might be some form of alchemical codex. I look forward to more information.

That was suspected for a long time, what is evident is that whoever wrote it was not very consequential, it was much more an exercise in "pretending to make gold", where a large amount of gold passed from one pocket to another.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#33    brizink

brizink

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 100 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 11 July 2013 - 12:02 PM

View Postjaylemurph, on 23 June 2013 - 01:12 AM, said:

Actually, I am -- not that I feel a particular need to defend that position to you here. If you want more information about the Tau maps and their position in the 15th Century particularly, I recommend David Summers' excellent book Vision, Relfection and Desire in West Painting (Univ of North Carolina Press, 2006). Unless, of course, you know more about the subject than an imminent Art Historian.



If by "the 1400's [sic]", you mean "Early 16th Century", yes it is from the early 16th Century, but not any older. [http://phys.org/news...perts-age.html]



This is interesting. Do you mean to say it's it from "the 1400's [sic]" or is it Wiccan, which is a purely modern movement and whose 'reconstructios' have almost nothing to do with whatever people were doing in the medieval period?

And, yes, it probably could have been considered witchcraft, not just by the common people, but by the most learned people in Europe. In fact, the learned people probably drew less of a distinction than the commoners. There was no formal distinction between medicine, astrology, and magic for almost another century, and many kinds of magic were not just tolerated but recommended by the Church. (Francis Yates discusses this merging of astronomy, magic and medicine specifically referencing the magical practices of Marcino Ficino in Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1964. You can also read there about Pope Alexander VI and the magician and cabbalist, Pico de Mirandola).



I'm not sure what "a strange but eloquent could save your head" even means.

Witches were burned, not beheaded -- which was generally reserved for treason, and usually for the upper classes. And anyway, witchburning wasn't particularly common until the end of the 16th Century and the 17th Century. In any case, it wasn't the common folk who'd be ordering such an execution, and the people who would, the literate upperclass, would have been unlikely to try to execute someone for having a magical textbook; there were plenty in print by people like Paracelsus, Agrippa and Ficino, and before printing, texts by people like Ramon Lull, people who lived long, successful lives, some with full church backing.

But as someone who "reads online" you probably already knew all this background material, right?

--Jaylemurph

A multi-quote would have been much easier. I don't need to defend myself on here? obviously you took that a bit personal. Haha, no one cares what sources you have cited or even what book you read on the subject. The truth is that the manuscript contains information that would be otherwise impossibly dangerous in the late 16th century. So assuming you are correct in that it cannot be older than you say, then of course getting burned at the stake (save your head is a euphemism, just because were talking about something pertaining to public execution doesn't mean I'm referencing the method of execution, ***SNIP*** you forgot to read between the lines) could be a real concern. As for individuals of the upper class that might have more to lose so to speak; they would be hard pressed if they did not cover something up. The fact that this was done by a scribe, e.g. someone who was getting paid lends some credence to why it was done in a conlang. I meant a strange and eloquent "writing", sorry for the apparent confusion,  you must not be very astute when it comes to being objective and progressive. Think outside the scholarly box. The only people who ever made progress did so, unlike yourself. Radio carbon dating has been disputed and hailed equally and by mainstream science since it was conceived. There are a number of reasons why it could be as old as 1100 bc and you can't prove otherwise, I'm not saying that it is, I'm just saying prove it. As for your Wicca reference  ***SNIP I'm aware that this is a general term that refers mostly to the neo-pagan movement as it pertains to the resurgence of Indo-European earth based religions. That being said, I don't think using the term "Wicca" or "Wiccan" is that far off from being relatively accurate enough for you to get what I'm referencing. You obviously did since you pointed out my "error". When you talk about all these teachers, theologians and clergymen, All I can really think is who in their right mind uses a few rich men from from Italy or Iberia and thinks that one could surmise an opinion on the whole of European attitude? If it was in writing and we still have it, you can bet that anything other than facts plucked from a timeline, are likely based on the opinions of men with a scued perspective since they would be very unlikely to be commoners with a full ink well and lots of blank pages along with enough time to not have to work or perhaps that is their work. Which they would likely get paid handsomely for.

Oh and lastly, I did point out that the website I read the "translation" on, was of dubious legitimacy. ***SNIP***

Edited by Waspie_Dwarf, 11 July 2013 - 01:21 PM.
removed personal attacks.


#34    Quaentum

Quaentum

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,611 posts
  • Joined:03 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The number of fringe believers is inversely proportional to what is left to discover in our world.

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:18 PM

I read, sometime in the past and can no longer remember precisely what it was, that one possibility was that the person suffered from a specific disorder (sorry been too long and don't remember) that included the creation of their own written languages.

AA LOGIC
They didn't use thousands of workers - oops forgot about the work camps
There's no evidence for ramps - You found one?...Bummer
Well we know they didn't use ancient tools to cut and shape the stones - Chisel marks?  Craps
I still say aliens built them!

#35    JesseCuster

JesseCuster

    Secret Jesus

  • Member
  • 3,087 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:27 PM

View PostEllJay, on 24 June 2013 - 08:13 PM, said:

Hmm, well it must have been a rich man without any wife and kids doing it, cause he spent a hell of a long time and money just to prank.
I wouldn't be so sure about that.  Have you heard of the Codex Seriphianus?  A similar book in that it's written in a seemingly unknown language and unknown script with all sorts of oddball illustrations of strange lifeforms.  At 360 pages, it took the artist (Luigi Serafini) two and a half years to complete it.

Perhaps the author of the Voynich manuscript worked on it in his spare time for years and didn't need to sacrifice family or personal life to do so.

http://en.wikipedia....x_Seraphinianus

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard P. Feynman

#36    jaylemurph

jaylemurph

    Lector Historiae

  • Member
  • 8,864 posts
  • Joined:02 Nov 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA

  • "You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make him think." Dorothy Parker

Posted 11 July 2013 - 08:41 PM

View Postbrizink, on 11 July 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:

The truth is that the manuscript contains information that would be otherwise impossibly dangerous in the late 16th century.

Well, no, that's not the truth. For that to be the truth, you'd have to actually know what was /in/ the text, and the whole point about this manuscript is that no one does. Except, apparently, you. So since you know what all the text says, please enlighten us.

Quote

As for individuals of the upper class that might have more to lose so to speak; they would be hard pressed if they did not cover something up.

Well, no. They would have less need to cover up, not more. As when the Popes received magical blessing from Campanella or rich men accumulated forbidden texts in their libraries. But it's all moot, since any reaction to the text would depend on the information contained in it. Which no one knows. But you.

Quote

The fact that this was done by a scribe

Well, I suppose if you somehow magically know the text of the manuscript, there's no reason you wouldn't also magically know its provenance. So sure, yeah, it was the work of a scribe and not the author.

Quote

Think outside the scholarly box. The only people who ever made progress did so, unlike yourself.

I will be happy to do so when you show me the difference between "thinking outside the box" and "making things up from whole cloth", and yet I have a lingering doubt based on the above you may have diffculty doing so. Dunno why.

Quote

There are a number of reasons why it could be as old as 1100 bc and you can't prove otherwise, I'm not saying that it is, I'm just saying prove it.

Wel, yes: if you magically know what was written and magically know who wrote it, it follows you would magically know when they did it. And I admit I certainly can't prove you don't magically know everything there is to know about the text.

But, actually, yes there are physical reasons it couldn't be from 1,100 BCE: paper, on which the text is written, did not exist then, nor did the style of binding used for the book, both of which did not develop until the current era (c. 200 CE and 700 CE, respectively). And I'd give you citation for those facts, but based on your snide comments above, you don't need no stinkin' facts.

But, gosh, it looks like your magical source of information about the manuscript is not infallible. That must be a blow for your ego.

Quote

As for your Wicca reference  ***SNIP I'm aware that this is a general term that refers mostly to the neo-pagan movement as it pertains to the resurgence of Indo-European earth based religions. That being said, I don't think using the term "Wicca" or "Wiccan" is that far off from being relatively accurate enough for you to get what I'm referencing.

And, indeed, it /is/ enough for you to demonstrate you don't quite know what you're talking about -- you can't even find the correct word to describe it.

Quote

When you talk about all these teachers, theologians and clergymen, All I can really think is who in their right mind uses a few rich men from from Italy or Iberia and thinks that one could surmise an opinion on the whole of European attitude?

Who in their right mind uses the opinions of a spectrum of period thinkers to discuss period thought? Well, (again) you've proven explicitly that you don't need no stinkin' textual references, so the precise answer is hard to discuss, so I'll just go with the simple "a lot" or more specifically, "a lot you don't know and apparently can't be arsed to find out." If you relent on your dedication to ignorance and want to follow up with things like names and books, I'll be happy to provide them.

Quote

If it was in writing and we still have it, you can bet that anything other than facts plucked from a timeline, are likely based on the opinions of men with a scued perspective since they would be very unlikely to be commoners with a full ink well and lots of blank pages along with enough time to not have to work or perhaps that is their work. Which they would likely get paid handsomely for.

I think you mean "skewed". I also think that we can safely add spelling to the list of your magic abilities that need a tune-up. And I've read that (run-on) sentence* four times and still can't quite work out what exactly you mean. Maybe you can clarify it for us.

*And grammar to that tune-up list, too.

Quote

Oh and lastly, I did point out that the website I read the "translation" on, was of dubious legitimacy. ***SNIP***

Well, you have made it understood your requirements for facts and accuracy is pretty low.

--Jaylemurph

"... amongst the most obstinate of our opinions may be classed those which derive from discussions in which we affect to search for the truth, while in reality we are only fortifying prejudice."     -- James Fenimore Cooper, The Pathfinder

Posted Image

Deeply venial

#37    lilthor

lilthor

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2010

Posted 06 August 2013 - 06:25 PM

Check out these drawings by Charles Steffen made in the 1950's while he was a patient at a mental hospital:

Posted Image
To me, they are eerily similar to those found in the VM.

Posted Image
Perhaps the origin of the VM can be partially explained by the mental state of its author.

http://www.huffingto..._n_3713308.html


#38    Dark_Grey

Dark_Grey

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,570 posts
  • Joined:08 Oct 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Alberta, Canada

  • if (empty($universe)) {
    include 'reality.php';
    }

Posted 06 August 2013 - 06:53 PM

View Postlilthor, on 06 August 2013 - 06:25 PM, said:

Check out these drawings by Charles Steffen made in the 1950's while he was a patient at a mental hospital:

Perhaps the origin of the VM can be partially explained by the mental state of its author.

http://www.huffingto..._n_3713308.html

Those are oddly similar (especially that first one). You may be on to something there...which would be bittersweet if it turned out to be true. Such a huge mystery turns out to be the work of a crazy person lol

“These International bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and the columns of these newspapers to club into submission or drive out of public office officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government.”

- Roosevelt


#39    I love the spookyness

I love the spookyness

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Joined:18 Aug 2013

Posted 18 August 2013 - 08:04 PM

Am i the only one who would die of laughter if this turned out to be a dirty book with instruction on how to make herbal viagra?





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users