DingoLingo, on 02 February 2013 - 11:48 PM, said:
the part I do like about this post most is the one about Whitley Streibers implant.. that was supposed to give hard evidence of alien implants..
"In _Confirmation_ Whitley Strieber describes several of the implants including one removed from his own external ear by a physician. It turned out to be collagen, the substance from which cartilage is formed. Strieber admits that the promised "hard evidence" provided by implants is not so hard after all: "I hope this book will not cause a rush to judgement," he writes, "with skeptics trying to prove that evidence so far retrieved is worthless while UFO believers conclude that it is proof. Both approaches are a waste of time, because the conclusive evidence has not yet been gathered."
Now I know Roger Leir is the guru when it comes to alien implants.. apparently.. yet have you ever wondered why he never actually sends the implants out to a independent research facility ?.. and I know in 2006 people were still waiting for a report from 4 years before hand on a implant.. thats when I lost interest in him..
Whitely Streiber
In all fairness to Roger Leir he did admit that what was postualted as being an alien claw turned out to be a slug. Lol. He did release the results for the entire world to see. Whitely Strieber has always been a little suspect in my opinion because of his constant bizarre stroy telling although I don't rule out that he could have been abducted in upstate NY and being a fictional writer opportunistically capitalized on alien abdcutions. I remember hearing a Bud Hopkins interview before he passed claiming that Strieber approached Hopkins on advice for the famous Grey alien face depicted on the cover of Communion. There's also the fact that alien abduction cliams did not start with Whitely Strieber.
I do agree that Hopkins implants removed from alleged abductees does deserve independent confirmation.
Here is: Analysis of Object Taken from Patient John Smith. There are alleged nanofibers and the metallurgical analysis does point to ET. I noticed some debunkers are going as far to say that some abductees are just being graved by asteroids as an explanation which I find hilarious. What is the likelyhood of that? The irony is aren't we now trying to mine asteroids?
See: Could asteroid mining be next step in space exploration?
It seems like another example of humans mimicking the ETs. I already stated examples of how NASA mimicks certain aspects of the UFO and close encounter phenomenon. There are a lot of cases of a UFO craft landing with landing legs, occupants with suits coming out and collecting soil and Earth specimen samples.
In the linked article above about mining asteroids:
"Now some visionaries say that it is time for the next step: to explore space for its resources, not just science."
So alien abduction could be an apsect of aliens seeing us as a type of resource. This would explain alien-human hybirds being described. This would aslo support the ETH since an implant very close to a rare asteriod would point to space faring species using space resources just as our own evolution into space is pointing to that sort of activity.
Here's Robert Bigelow on minimg the moon for helium-3











