Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 1 votes

Clear video of UFO's responding to lasers


  • Please log in to reply
102 replies to this topic

#16    booNyzarC

booNyzarC

    Forum Divinity

  • Closed
  • 13,536 posts
  • Joined:18 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 06 November 2012 - 05:34 PM

View Postsynchronomy, on 06 November 2012 - 04:57 PM, said:

Illusory perception.  Once we see a v-formation, the brain sticks with it.  Assuming for arguments, these objects forming the v are at say 500ft, how much do you think these are drifting.
Here's three frames frozen of the "v-formation" seen in this video, and heck I've been to airshows and seen tighter formations between fighter jets:


Agreed, and good comparative pics showing breaks in the formation.

They actually do stay in pretty good formation most of the time, but there are fluctuations.  Here's a somewhat stabilized rendering that I think shows the fluctuations.

Posted Image

This is 30 frames taken at irregular intervals (chosen due to lack of blur) from the below video, stabilized on the leading object only.

Seems clear to me that we are looking at 5 distinct and independently moving objects in the sky, not 1.  Also because it is night vision, these objects are extremely unlikely to be self illuminating but rather reflecting light from the ground.

Here's a shorter version of just this segment from the OP video:




I'm still convinced that we're looking at birds in this one.

Cheers.


#17    bee

bee

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,942 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 06 November 2012 - 06:32 PM

View Postsynchronomy, on 06 November 2012 - 04:57 PM, said:

Illusory perception.  Once we see a v-formation, the brain sticks with it.
  

errrr really...?...what a load of....... :rolleyes:

it is NOT illusory perception, in this instance.


Quote

Assuming for arguments, these objects forming the v are at say 500ft, how much do you think these are drifting.

do we know how high it was....? It looked higher to me, but I'm just guessing.


Quote

Here's three frames frozen of the "v-formation" seen in this video, and heck I've been to airshows and seen tighter formations between fighter jets:

can you put the exact time on your images in future, please. Because, frankly, without the time the images are worthless.

And....looks like we got another Big Black Delta.... :w00t: ... :D

[images snipped]


#18    bee

bee

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,942 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 06 November 2012 - 06:43 PM

View PostbooNyzarC, on 06 November 2012 - 05:34 PM, said:

Here's a shorter version of just this segment from the OP video:




I'm still convinced that we're looking at birds in this one.

Cheers.


booN.....same to you....can you reference the time in the OP video...bacause I've just watched it and I didn't see what

is in your video in the full length one. Unless I missed it..

I saw your post before I watched the vid....so I was looking out for it....please can you say what time it was... :)

thanks


:tu:


.


#19    bee

bee

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,942 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:00 PM

View Postuprize, on 06 November 2012 - 11:07 AM, said:

Hi guys, a friend showed me this interesting video.
Its a series of night videos of objects moving in the sky and responding to laser signals.

The ending is also very interesting and is a video of Dr Greer showing footage from some of his meetings he has where he demonstrates this technique to people.
I was quite sceptical of this guy but this has me intrigued.

Thoughts people?
And I doubt they are satelites. They dont glow :D


[video snipped]




I think it was a good video...cheers for posting.

It get's really busy up there, eh..... :o :)....I've seen a few night vision videos like this before, but I like this compilation.

I like the exuberant sound affects as well....


:tu:


#20    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London UK

  • It is later than you think.

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:06 PM

View Postuprize, on 06 November 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:

Watch the whole thing and then comment please.

I agree; beware the casual critique syndrome.  Drives me up the wall.

Posted Image


#21    booNyzarC

booNyzarC

    Forum Divinity

  • Closed
  • 13,536 posts
  • Joined:18 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:06 PM

View Postbee, on 06 November 2012 - 06:43 PM, said:

booN.....same to you....can you reference the time in the OP video...bacause I've just watched it and I didn't see what

is in your video in the full length one. Unless I missed it..

I saw your post before I watched the vid....so I was looking out for it....please can you say what time it was... :)

thanks


:tu:


.

The matching section of footage in the OP video starts at about 4:32 or so.


Edit to add...

This one might even be a better version, perhaps the original?



Edited by booNyzarC, 06 November 2012 - 07:12 PM.


#22    Professor T

Professor T

    Λ Ο Δ

  • Member
  • 2,400 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • I'm not really a Professor so don't take my words as Gospel

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:10 PM

Much of this imo were satellites..
Not to sure on the V formation, probably birds.

I see much of these things every night while stargazing.. The two flying in formation, deffinately ISS & service module..
The intersecting ones, satellites.. The Flashing, pulsing ones, not so much, but still man-made..

Find a dark country road well away from city lights not long after sunset and anyone can see these things..

Must admit though, there have been odd occasions where I've seen some dart away on other angles and change course, though this of course could be illusion born of straining to see some of them against the stars..

Edited to add: Things to look out for that mark that an object isn't a satellite are: Changes in course, stopping for longer than 2 seconds, rapid changes in speed, these I have seen but are very rare.

Edited by Professor T, 06 November 2012 - 07:14 PM.


#23    synchronomy

synchronomy

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,124 posts
  • Joined:05 Mar 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario Canada

  • Facinating

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:10 PM

View Postbee, on 06 November 2012 - 06:32 PM, said:


do we know how high it was....? It looked higher to me, but I'm just guessing.


can you put the exact time on your images in future, please. Because, frankly, without the time the images are worthless.


I was guessing a low altitude.  If you assume a higher altitude, then the deviation of the formation would just be further laterally.

The stills I provided are between about 4:45 - 5:10 .

At the heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes--an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive they may be, and the most ruthless skeptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new.
This is how deep truths are winnowed from deep nonsense. -- Carl Sagan

#24    Slave2Fate

Slave2Fate

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 6,414 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Right behind you!

  • If you don't believe the sun will rise
    Stand alone and greet the coming night
    In the last remaining light -Audioslave

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:12 PM

View Postzoser, on 06 November 2012 - 07:06 PM, said:

I agree; beware the casual critique syndrome.  Drives me up the wall.

As opposed to the casual proponent syndrome?

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#25    bee

bee

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,942 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:28 PM

View PostbooNyzarC, on 06 November 2012 - 07:06 PM, said:

The matching section of footage in the OP video starts at about 4:32 or so.


Edit to add...

This one might even be a better version, perhaps the original?


thanks....well to me the first part isn't in the OP...using the 'flashing white triangle' as a guide.

then the triangle with the lights come into it and that is in the OP video.

so this must be a mixture of footage?

Just wanted to clear that up as I thought I was missing it. But it wasn't there.

cheers

.


#26    booNyzarC

booNyzarC

    Forum Divinity

  • Closed
  • 13,536 posts
  • Joined:18 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:36 PM

View Postbee, on 06 November 2012 - 07:28 PM, said:

thanks....well to me the first part isn't in the OP...using the 'flashing white triangle' as a guide.

then the triangle with the lights come into it and that is in the OP video.

so this must be a mixture of footage?

Just wanted to clear that up as I thought I was missing it. But it wasn't there.

cheers

.

Yeah, I wasn't suggesting that the 3 lights which disappeared immediately before that section were in the video(s) I linked, only the night vision footage with 5 objects in formation (notice the green tint...) ;)

This footage was covered by Fact of Faked: Paranormal Files in Season 1, Episode 7 by the way.  It's available on Netflix if anyone is interested in finding out what they thought it was...


#27    bee

bee

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,942 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:47 PM

View Postsynchronomy, on 06 November 2012 - 07:10 PM, said:

I was guessing a low altitude.  If you assume a higher altitude, then the deviation of the formation would just be further laterally.

The stills I provided are between about 4:45 - 5:10 .


you must have dug sooooo deep to find those screen shots..... ^_^


That triangle holds fine. There may be split seconds (literally) a couple of times? when minute movement from the camera may create a miniscule

'deviation'....or another light comes flashing past near the triangle and looks for a split second that it's part of it.

Or have you considered some momentary atmospheric affect?



The best thing to do with screen shots is leave the time on at the bottom. Then there can be no question about it.

Because without the time on the screen there is a question.

cheers

.


#28    Slave2Fate

Slave2Fate

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 6,414 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Right behind you!

  • If you don't believe the sun will rise
    Stand alone and greet the coming night
    In the last remaining light -Audioslave

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:49 PM

View PostbooNyzarC, on 06 November 2012 - 05:34 PM, said:

I'm still convinced that we're looking at birds in this one.

Thanks for the GIF booN, it does show that the lights aren't static in relation to one another. There is enough variation with the distance between lights as well as their configuration to conclude that this wasn't a single object (Phoenix lights anyone? :P). I don't know if it was birds or not although that is probably a good bet. :tu:

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#29    Sweetpumper

Sweetpumper

    Heatseeker

  • Member
  • 10,130 posts
  • Joined:19 Dec 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Avengers Tower

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:51 PM

I think we can toss in the military's experimental hologram explanation here, too.

"At it's most basic level, science is supposed to represent the investigation of the unexplained, not the explanation of the uninvestigated."
- Hunt for the Skinwalker

"So many people forget that the first country the Nazis invaded was their own." Dr. Abraham Erskine

#30    bee

bee

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,942 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 06 November 2012 - 07:53 PM

View PostbooNyzarC, on 06 November 2012 - 07:36 PM, said:

Yeah, I wasn't suggesting that the 3 lights which disappeared immediately before that section were in the video(s) I linked, only the night vision footage with 5 objects in formation (notice the green tint...) ;)

you mean the green tint throughout your whole video? Yes I noticed that...... :)


.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users