me-wonders, on 02 December 2012 - 12:26 AM, said:
I think we also need to know who the allies are and how armed they are? It is my understanding the US is largely responsible for the military build up of Israel and I think this was a bad choice for the US. It goes with granting arms to other mid east countries as well, and then selling the weapons, escalating the destruction of war, to benefit US interest. I wonder how history will look at this? And it is so much about oil, a finite resource. Oil money is used to buy weapons and these countries will not peacefully fall into poverty when they exhaust their supply of oil. Too bad we ignore Socrates and the obvious consequences of our decisions.
I agree that the wholesale arming of countries for profit is a detestable thing that has caused mankind no end of suffering. I think that where Israel is concerned, the turning point came in the late 1960's. France helped Israel, some say with stolen US uranium, to become a nuclear power. Once that happened the US was connected at the hip with our middle east ally for all time. Israel is so small that they can lose only once. Their enemies are so full of hatred for them (justified or not) that they will not just take land and be satisfied. Their goal is to annihilate the Jewish State - they've said so many times. So from Israeli's pov, to lose means to see their children slaughtered. Since NO ONE would allow this to happen if they could stop it and since the Jews have seen this movie before, they can be expected to use those nukes if they know they are going down. This is why it is insane for all the countries of the world to act as if Israel can be talked, cajoled or shamed into making a deal that will leave them nearly defenseless against their enemies. Yet they still keep pushing and pressuring Israel into a tighter and tighter corner. The Iranian bomb will be like the lighting of a fuse, the beginning of the countdown.