Wandering, on 30 March 2012 - 02:46 AM, said:
Fair enough then, I'm not a fan of Fundamentalist Christians either but as long as they don't let it interfere with their work and don't push it on others I don't mind.
It does not have to interfere with their work, they can consider it their work to bring you the word of God, and that could interfere with your life, and your loved ones. I have no doubt that fundamentalist Christians think that they are helping the world by attempting to remove the Devils Darwinism and promote Gods work, and I bet they think that they are helping young minds by "showing them the way". I just do not think irrational people should be in a position of power.
Wandering, on 30 March 2012 - 02:46 AM, said:
Alot of people believe in the possibility of ET having visited Earth, you can't really say either way he's right and wrong because you just don't know what his personal experiences were.
I feel I can, I have also studied the subject in depth, and my claim is that he is outright lying, or steadily losing his faculties. If he wishes to make the assertion in public, I feel I have every right to say "BS" and ask for empirical proof. Every other discipline such as medicine, engineering and science has to provide empirical proof for any claim, let alone an outrageous one, I see no reason why this man should be exempt from the rules the rest of the world follow. I am more interested in his motivation. What did he expect from going public??
After Gary McKinnon, I think every single wild claim should be taken with a grain of salt the size of the rock of Gibraltar.
Wandering, on 30 March 2012 - 02:46 AM, said:
If he's a good councillor, I just don't see any reason why because of a little Alien story he shouldn't be allowed to prove himself. People can believe in quite unusual things and still have a 'level head' so to speak.
It shows irrationality. I cannot abide by that in a leader.
Wandering, on 30 March 2012 - 02:46 AM, said:
Mind you, after seeing the end of that video I'm more inclined to agree with you now.
It was the initial article I thought was put across quite well by him.
Most articles do. They first 15 mins - 1/2 hour must garner your attention, or 99% of viewers will switch off. These loose snippets have a tendency to just keep growing if not checked. Look at the sad sorry of Roswell which the tatters lie in today. I have a few UFO conspiracy videos at home, one I quite like is
50 Years of Denial. But I put little stock in the claims. I looked some up and found they were even using stock photoshop images in the presentation. bmk helped me track one photo down of an aircraft chasing a UFO aired in the presentation. It can be a bit disillusioning, bit it remains entertaining.
Check out the link I left above in my post #37, I think you might enjoy it more

I have to admit, I found it entertaining and watched the whole thing. But I still think "Mum" is more whacky than a stoned fruitcake.
Edited by psyche101, 30 March 2012 - 03:13 AM.