Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Monsato = evil, They will be the death of us


  • Please log in to reply
167 replies to this topic

#31    OverSword

OverSword

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,431 posts
  • Joined:16 Oct 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle WA USA

  • When the power of love overcomes the love of power then humanity can evolve

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:13 PM

*
POPULAR

View PostFurthurBB, on 27 February 2013 - 03:35 PM, said:

It does not matter what way you change the genetics the end result is the same.
untrue statement.


#32    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,661 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:31 PM

*
POPULAR

View PostFurthurBB, on 27 February 2013 - 03:31 PM, said:

What?  They did alter the genetics and pushed it on the public untested.  There is nothing natural about it and it doesn't matter what way the genetics were altered, the end mechanism is the same.  Now, as for Monsanto, they should not be allowed to sue people over cross pollination or breeding techniques.  That is like trying to sue nature.
Selective breeding is not the same as genetic splicing.
Selective breeding is applying the principles of accellerated evolution and the outcomes are largely predictable based upon the components which are breed together.

Splicing disimilar genes from different groups assumes that there is a one to one relationshoip between a gene and a protein expression with a specific predictable conseuqunce of that protein on the plants physiology. It is now known is that there is no single gene to protein relationship. Each gene code to multiple proteins dependent on the state of gene switches. The consequence of this is that a seemingly predictable gene splice can cause a whole range of different protein expressions dependent on the environmental stresses the plant is placed under. This is the field of genetics of which we have barely started to scratch the surface. Hence to splice a gene from one organism to another is like playing russian roulette with our food.
There is already a growing body of evidence that GM  crop residues which peasant farmers rely on to feed their stock have been turned toxic to grazing animals and caused deaths in the stock. This was neither anticipated or detected before these crops were placed on the market.

The potential consequences of meddling in something so fundamental before you have even learned the language are to horrific to contemplate.

The companies know that people will not trust GM crops to be safe and so they have spent the last 10 years lobbying to never have to declare to their customers that they are selling GM foods. Would you trust anyone with so little confidcence in their own products.

Only a lack of awareness of genetics could possibly allow you to believe that this is the same as selective breeding and that there are no risks involved. Let us not forget that no GM crop has shown increased productivity over its none GM counterparts.

Br Cornelius

Edited by Br Cornelius, 27 February 2013 - 04:39 PM.

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#33    Gummug

Gummug

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,369 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

  • "There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy" -- Shakespeare

Posted 27 February 2013 - 08:12 PM

View PostYamato, on 27 February 2013 - 09:33 AM, said:

I realize I will never have the resources to determine what is safe from what isn't in a timely manner, so as a personal response I've taken the following article to heart in the past year and attempt to follow its advice as closely as I possibly can.   I thought I'd pass it onto you because I think you'd appreciate it Gummug.  I think the essence of the idea is best described by the quote "consuming food in its most natural state, or as close to it as possible."

http://www.dailystre...-meal-at-a-time
Thank you, and I mean it! Right now I have to run but I am really looking forward to reading your link when I return. :)

Posted Image


#34    Gummug

Gummug

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,369 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

  • "There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy" -- Shakespeare

Posted 27 February 2013 - 08:23 PM

View PostBr Cornelius, on 27 February 2013 - 04:31 PM, said:

Selective breeding is not the same as genetic splicing.
Selective breeding is applying the principles of accellerated evolution and the outcomes are largely predictable based upon the components which are breed together.

Splicing disimilar genes from different groups assumes that there is a one to one relationshoip between a gene and a protein expression with a specific predictable conseuqunce of that protein on the plants physiology. It is now known is that there is no single gene to protein relationship. Each gene code to multiple proteins dependent on the state of gene switches. The consequence of this is that a seemingly predictable gene splice can cause a whole range of different protein expressions dependent on the environmental stresses the plant is placed under. This is the field of genetics of which we have barely started to scratch the surface. Hence to splice a gene from one organism to another is like playing russian roulette with our food.
There is already a growing body of evidence that GM  crop residues which peasant farmers rely on to feed their stock have been turned toxic to grazing animals and caused deaths in the stock. This was neither anticipated or detected before these crops were placed on the market.

The potential consequences of meddling in something so fundamental before you have even learned the language are to horrific to contemplate.

The companies know that people will not trust GM crops to be safe and so they have spent the last 10 years lobbying to never have to declare to their customers that they are selling GM foods. Would you trust anyone with so little confidcence in their own products.

Only a lack of awareness of genetics could possibly allow you to believe that this is the same as selective breeding and that there are no risks involved. Let us not forget that no GM crop has shown increased productivity over its none GM counterparts.

Br Cornelius
I don't want to hi-jack this thread, but I learned that when Monsanto introduced some GM (I think it was cotton) seed in India, they promised the farmers it would produce more and better crops. After they had cornered the market and driven the natural seed off, they quadruled the price of the seed and the farmers had to take out loans to buy it. When they couldn't repay the loans, some of the farmers committed suicide...very horrible. If requested, I'll try and find the link. Imo, Monsanto, at least the top level managers is a CRIMINAL organization.
edited to remove double quote...don't know how I did that...
2nd edit: OK I'm a stickler for typos

Edited by Gummug, 27 February 2013 - 08:28 PM.

Posted Image


#35    MichaelW

MichaelW

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,523 posts
  • Joined:14 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nelson, New Zealand

  • Doctors are sadists who like to play God and watch lesser people scream.

Posted 27 February 2013 - 11:38 PM

View Postjugoso, on 27 February 2013 - 03:13 PM, said:

Perhaps you should take some of your own advice.

Why, pray tell, should I follow my own advice? I know when to back down, but I haven't come across a scenario where that has been the case.

View PostOverSword, on 27 February 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

I'm totaly against genetic engineering and feel it's very risky.

So when the science is proven, you're still going to sit there, clinging to your ****ty conspiracy theories and withered vegetables? Please yourself. But I know which one of us will die of starvation first.

Quote

If you had your choice between a potato grown using natural fertilizer..

Assuming of course, natural fertilizer means manure and not the substance one buys in large sacks at gardening and hardware stores.

Quote

In a clean field and one geneticaly engineered for multiple purposes would you really eat the frankenpotato?  Not me brother.

I really wouldn't care.

Quote

Michael, what people do to interbreed plants and the genetic engineering done in the lab are not the same thing.

Still altering the genetic makeup of plants. Therefore, it's genetic engineering.

Edited by MichaelW, 27 February 2013 - 11:39 PM.

Signature removed - please see rule 3b.

#36    MichaelW

MichaelW

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,523 posts
  • Joined:14 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nelson, New Zealand

  • Doctors are sadists who like to play God and watch lesser people scream.

Posted 27 February 2013 - 11:42 PM

View PostBr Cornelius, on 27 February 2013 - 04:31 PM, said:

Selective breeding is applying the principles of accellerated evolution and the outcomes are largely predictable based upon the components which are breed together.

In other words, you are altering the genetic make up of a plant for whatever needs that made you do so in the first place, be it adaption to climate or whatever.

Signature removed - please see rule 3b.

#37    jugoso

jugoso

    One Love

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,601 posts
  • Joined:13 Apr 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mexico

  • "Freedom is free of the need to feel free. Free your mind and you ass will follow. The kingdom of heaven is within"
    G.Clinton

Posted 28 February 2013 - 03:36 AM

View PostMichaelW, on 27 February 2013 - 01:23 AM, said:

Genetic engineering of food plants is safe and has been proven to be safe.

View PostMichaelW, on 27 February 2013 - 11:38 PM, said:


So when the science is proven, you're still going to sit there,..

Seems like you´re contradicting yourself. can you clarify please.

"Freedom is free of the need to feel free.
Free your mind and you ass will follow.
The kingdom of heaven is within"
G.Clinton

#38    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 28 February 2013 - 04:08 AM

Quote

In other words, you are altering the genetic make up of a plant for whatever needs that made you do so in the first place, be it adaption to climate or whatever.

Its actually called selective breeding. Something youve been told several times and ignored.


#39    MichaelW

MichaelW

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,523 posts
  • Joined:14 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nelson, New Zealand

  • Doctors are sadists who like to play God and watch lesser people scream.

Posted 28 February 2013 - 05:24 AM

View Postjugoso, on 28 February 2013 - 03:36 AM, said:

Seems like you´re contradicting yourself. can you clarify please.

I'm saying that relevant authorities such as the WHO have ruled GM foods and such to be safe.


View PostAsteroidX, on 28 February 2013 - 04:08 AM, said:

Its actually called selective breeding. Something youve been told several times and ignored.

I haven't ignored it. Selective breeding is genetic modification.

Signature removed - please see rule 3b.

#40    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 18,715 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 28 February 2013 - 05:45 AM

Well, the simple fact is that some 80% to 90% of Canola, Papaya, Corn, Cotton, Soybeans, Sugar Beets and probably Wheat and Potatos are GMO plants in the US today. It is really going to be hard for the great masses of US consumers to avoid them. So, I'm still waiting for that Gigantic Leap in Death, Illness, Mental Damage, or other ill affects that the Doom sayers are predicting. It is true that it is impossible to predict what will happen long term, but it seems just as likely, or more so, that nothing will actually happen. Not every insecticide is DDT. Not every fertilizer is going to damage human chromosomes.

I do agree more testing needs to be done by impartial organizations, but this Doomsaying is just political propoganda. (Even if it is true!)

Edited by DieChecker, 28 February 2013 - 05:45 AM.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker

#41    Orcseeker

Orcseeker

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,769 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 28 February 2013 - 05:52 AM

View PostMichaelW, on 26 February 2013 - 03:00 AM, said:



However, the science is not.

Regardless, the way Monsanto do business isn't ethically or morally right at all.


#42    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 28 February 2013 - 05:52 AM

Quote

I haven't ignored it. Selective breeding is genetic modification.

So far from reality you are. Im going to guess you never grown a plant or raised an animal before.


#43    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,817 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 28 February 2013 - 05:53 AM

View PostMichaelW, on 28 February 2013 - 05:24 AM, said:

I'm saying that relevant authorities such as the WHO have ruled GM foods and such to be safe.
WHO: And our ruling is ... *gets handed a hundred million dollars* it's perfectly safe.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#44    Gummug

Gummug

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,369 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

  • "There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy" -- Shakespeare

Posted 28 February 2013 - 05:57 AM

View PostDieChecker, on 28 February 2013 - 05:45 AM, said:

Well, the simple fact is that some 80% to 90% of Canola, Papaya, Corn, Cotton, Soybeans, Sugar Beets and probably Wheat and Potatos are GMO plants in the US today. It is really going to be hard for the great masses of US consumers to avoid them. So, I'm still waiting for that Gigantic Leap in Death, Illness, Mental Damage, or other ill affects that the Doom sayers are predicting. It is true that it is impossible to predict what will happen long term, but it seems just as likely, or more so, that nothing will actually happen. Not every insecticide is DDT. Not every fertilizer is going to damage human chromosomes.

I do agree more testing needs to be done by impartial organizations, but this Doomsaying is just political propoganda. (Even if it is true!)
It just seems to me a bit hypocritical that for any food product (unless it's a simple fruit or vegetable or meat), you have to list the ingredients, but you don't have to state whether it's GMO or not.    :(

Posted Image


#45    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,661 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:50 AM

View PostDieChecker, on 28 February 2013 - 05:45 AM, said:

Well, the simple fact is that some 80% to 90% of Canola, Papaya, Corn, Cotton, Soybeans, Sugar Beets and probably Wheat and Potatos are GMO plants in the US today. It is really going to be hard for the great masses of US consumers to avoid them. So, I'm still waiting for that Gigantic Leap in Death, Illness, Mental Damage, or other ill affects that the Doom sayers are predicting. It is true that it is impossible to predict what will happen long term, but it seems just as likely, or more so, that nothing will actually happen. Not every insecticide is DDT. Not every fertilizer is going to damage human chromosomes.

I do agree more testing needs to be done by impartial organizations, but this Doomsaying is just political propoganda. (Even if it is true!)
But there is a growing body of evidence of harm. The real problem though is that the food safety organizations have been corrupted by a revolving door approach with companies like Monsanto. In such a situation we are unlikely to see the relevant research financed or published. Monsanto has received special favours status in America since Bush senior and the US government has used its political muscle to punish any country which rejects Monsanto GMO products ever since (wikileaks has the smoking gun).

America has some of the worst food related health indicators in the world so I am not entirely certain that the damage isn't already rearing its ugly head.

That is not a situation which is likely to develop a body of impartial research. All of this for a product that doesn't increase crop yields.

Br Cornelius

Edited by Br Cornelius, 28 February 2013 - 07:52 AM.

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users