Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 20 votes

Did we land on the moon?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
14134 replies to this topic

#61    The Skeptic Eric Raven

The Skeptic Eric Raven

    Master Blaster

  • Member
  • 11,065 posts
  • Joined:08 Dec 2004

Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:14 PM

Quote

Thats Because GOOD disinformation specialists
only use information thats TRUE ...so in most cases its
easy to "agree" with a GOOD disinformation specialist.
as its not so much the material they post but the
context in which it is used

So do you believe in all the CT's?

........the sleeper has awoken!
Sometimes we need a kick in the butt to wake us up. Well, I'm up now!Boo ya.


...there are many things in life that will capture your eye, but very few will capture your heart. These are the ones to pursue. These are the ones worth keeping..."

#62    jimmyphelps

jimmyphelps

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 585 posts
  • Joined:02 Feb 2007

Posted 13 March 2007 - 12:46 AM

Quote

So do you believe in all the CT's?

ummmmm where exactly are you deriving this from?
I never said i believe all Ct's? im thinking you completly
missed my point apprently? No i dont believe in all Ct's



thanks for posting



#63    Cynical1

Cynical1

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 49 posts
  • Joined:06 Sep 2005

Posted 13 March 2007 - 07:10 PM

Quote

Educate yourself on the subject??? original.gif

He actually said that, didn't he???
Perhaps, Cynical1, you would like to educate me on "the subject"...where did you get your education?
It's sounding suspiciously like it was at the Bart Sibrel school of lunar exploratory fallacy?
Let me give you a clue in this matter.
You seem to be adhereing to an accusation:  that being that we did not in fact do what is documented and substantiated more than any single scientific accomplishment in history--land on the Moon.

Thus, you must show us proof that we didn't.  Not the other way around.

Since that is going to be mighty difficult (trust me, it will), it would be best if you simply aired your doubts in question form here.  Some of the more knowledgable people will be more than happy to explain various things that you may not know about, and erase your doubts through the onlky thing that really can do such a thing:   knowledge.
That's what we're about.  

So how about we get away from the "dumbass" stuff and approach this from the desire to learn something?
Alot of "dumbasses" have come here intent on causing a stir in the past.   None of them are here today...because, they were, as you say, "dumbasses".  
It's alot more fun to learn about things.   There are several people here who will be more than happy to lend their scientific knowledge and practical experience to that goal.

Be nice.  Ask a question.  You'll probably find out something you didn't know.    That's always a good thing.
After all, you yourself said..."There are many unanswered questions..."
Here is the place to get them answered.




#64    MID

MID

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,490 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2005

Posted 13 March 2007 - 11:39 PM

Quoting me is much appreciated, but that post is already on this thread.

Was there something you missed?




#65    postbaguk

postbaguk

    Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 994 posts
  • Joined:17 Aug 2006

Posted 13 March 2007 - 11:59 PM

Quote

Posty:

I'll have to defer to your research in this matter.  There's certainly no reason to doubt it!
I always heard Dr. Von Braun went on vacation in 1968 to Antarctica   (of course, for him, working might have been considered a vacation!).  
He was somewhat of a Rennaisance man, as well as a man possessed of incredible energy.   He did all kinds of things like that in his day...out to sea, under the sea, Antarctica, in the air (an avid pilot as well as rocket designer), etc., etc.   I can also see Max Faget doing something like that as well.

However, I never actually knew this (I didn't pay attention to everything everyone did  original.gif ).   Interesting, certainly.  
And of course ...is a rather good point.  And, it hasn't been explained away by HBs.   There is an explanation, of course, which is rarely accepted, for obvious reasons.
Agreed!

thumbsup.gif


No problem - I shall try and get the full article posted somewhere sometime this week. Incidentally, the article dates from May 1967, and Von Braun refers to his trip as being "last January" - whether he means Jan 1966 or Jan 1967 I'm not sure.


#66    MID

MID

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,490 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2005

Posted 14 March 2007 - 12:23 AM

Quote

No problem - I shall try and get the full article posted somewhere sometime this week. Incidentally, the article dates from May 1967, and Von Braun refers to his trip as being "last January" - whether he means Jan 1966 or Jan 1967 I'm not sure.



I always thought he went down there in '68.
Well, I'll look it all up sometime, and look forward to your article.

...sounds like a conspiracy brewing here!
w00t.gif







#67    RAMS

RAMS

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 200 posts
  • Joined:28 Mar 2007

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:03 PM

Quote

It wasn't a remote control actually, it was activated by Neil Armstrong pulling a lanyard which opened the MESA. The camera had already been pre positioned to point that the ladder, it's in the Press Briefing pack I have if anyone wants to see it.



Correct.


RAMS

Robert A.M. Stephens,  LLC
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
http://www.behold-the-rage.com
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel

#68    gtars

gtars

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 128 posts
  • Joined:30 Mar 2007

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:03 AM

Quote

There is a little known invention called remote control.


I take it that most of you on this subject were not alive during the landings, or if you were you weren't paying attention?
As for the Van Allen Belts, there is radiation in them, but fatal doses would require a long time exposure. Believe this or
not, they actually had people with brains back then that dealt with the radiation for the entire mission! They used a
magical thing called "Gold Foil" and "Gold Veritran" to shield the electronics and the astronauts from radiation. This
magical foil is not quite as protective as lead, but almost!  The helmets worn on the moon had a flip down visor made
of gold veritran (a thin layer of gold impregnated onto it) which protected them from radiation to their heads when
walking on the moon.  The suits had a gold foil layer impregnated into their construction as well.  So, these guys
back in the sixties actually thought these things through and lined their equipment with radiation limiting gold foil
and gold veritran glass.

Back when the landings were taking place, I watched every minute of every single mission while they were on the
moon (less bathroom breaks and eating food).  All I can say is to reproduce days of coverage of multiple missions
in 1/6th gravity conditions would have been monumental to create in any studio.  One key element to watch for
IF you ever see them show footage from the moon, is that when the astronauts fall down, their arms are whipping
about at a normal speed to correct their fall.  If you sped their arms up to compensate for "slowing film down"
to simulate 1/6th gravity, then their arms would go at a speed that no human could do easily in a bulky space suit.

Another point is the hours and hours of footage of the lunar rover missions that I watched. If done in a studio,
it would have been quite a large studio as I watched them bounce on the vehicle in 1/6th gravity until they were
miles away from the camera!  Now that would be the biggest set ever constructed huh?  A studio miles deep
with 9,000 foot mountains in it, that you see your astronauts drive up to?  Also even the foothills that they drove
around would require more sand than you could put in a studio let alone fit the foothill itself into the studio as
they were quite high.  

A final point that would be very hard to fake is when the ascent stage of the lunar module lifted off of it's base,
the debris flew off of it and scattered in a manner that showed no wind resistance for the type of material it
was.  The lunar module was practically made out of heavy duty aluminum foil.. The bottom descent stage was
covered with foil (gold).. And when it blasted off, it shot out pieces of foil in vast distances that if there was
any atmosphere present, it could not have flown that far outward.  The atmospheric drag would have stopped
it from going as far as it did.  

I don't know why people want to believe we had never gone to the moon.  The mission was done at a time
when we had great people and engineers from all walks of life working on the project. The entire nation
at that time was challenged by President Kennedy to achieve this task. The entire nation rounded up it's
best and brightest minds to meet the challenge put forth.  It wasn't as though there was only NASA working
on it.. There were hundreds of thousands of Americans, and foreign people as well trying to get the mission
to work.  Even my Father helped in manufacturing a trailer to help move rocket parts about!  So, it was
an entire nation putting it's best and brightest scientists, engineers, and every other vocation that you
could dream of, together to make a major step for mankind.  It was accomplished. Then some bright
guy who wasn't even alive during the missions see's some funny shadows out of place in the moon
pictures and decides that these are done in a studio.  He presents some interesting points, but then
on a National Geo special, they reproduced the conditions to show that all of his assertions are all wet.
With a bright surface as the moon was, the camera is not able to pick up stars shining above. Anyone
who has owned a film camera such as myself (photographer) knows that to capture stars you must
open the lens for several seconds at a time in order to catch stars on film.. With a bright surface and
a shutter click of a split second, you are not going to get stars in the picture at all. The contrasts are
too great for even sensitive film to pick up with a shutter setting set to compensate for a bright surface.
So, even though the guy(s) that started the conspiracy were all wet, there are still millions that have
bought into this new hoax.. The hoax theory is the hoax!  

One thing you may want to consider, is that the astronauts left several mirrors on the moon and
pointed them at the earth. To this day astronomers in major universities, and at the major
telecopes still bounce laser beams off of these mirrors!  They judge the distance between the
earth and moon by using this laser and the mirrors.  So there is another thing to show that
we went to the moon.  Also, the technicians that packed the lunar modules into the Saturn V
rockets would ask, if they aren't now on the moon, then where are they?  They crashed them
back onto the moon, when they were done using them. That is how we got the seismic data
from the sensors left on the moon!  Where would that data have come from at the exact
moment of impact, had we not gone to the moon?  We went there and I watched the whole
thing on television on all of the missions.  I just want to ask how they could put a whole
series of mountains into a studio and drive around them in 1/6th gravity?  (And if you watched
closely, the astronauts arms and legs all move at correct human speed, even though the
gravity was shown at 1/6th of the earths gravity.. That would be a real trick, as we had
no computer graphics back in those days to re-create what we have now.  Entire mountains
on a set?  Sand flying up from the wheels on the rovers way high up into the lunar sky in a way
not possible had it been on earth?  (They even had to make fenders to put on it, as they
hadn't planned for the sand to fly up at them like that, so they made some out of file folders
or something they had on board).  If it was faked, I would have to say that it was a more
monumental job doing the fake (as an earlier poster said) than it would have been to go
to the moon itself..


#69    RAMS

RAMS

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 200 posts
  • Joined:28 Mar 2007

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:09 AM



Excellent dissertation, balanced and accurate as well.

Kudos.

RAMS

Edited by Magikman, 30 March 2007 - 12:01 PM.
quoting the entire context of the post that sits directly above yours is redundant and highly irritating.

Robert A.M. Stephens,  LLC
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
http://www.behold-the-rage.com
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel

#70    MID

MID

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,490 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2005

Posted 31 March 2007 - 06:21 PM

Quote

I take it that most of you on this subject were not alive during the landings, or if you were you weren't paying attention?


gtars,

You make some good points in your post.

Something I think you will find, regarding people who have a "problem" with Apollo and the lunar landings, is that the vast majority of them are younger.
I have estimated that the majority of these people range from virtually children to people perhaps in their 40s.   Anyone much older than that would have necessarily come out of a different generation, one in which education had more emphasis on science and mathematics than it generally does today, and one in which the Apollo program was happening.


Quote

As for the Van Allen Belts, there is radiation in them, but fatal doses would require a long time exposure. Believe this or
not, they actually had people with brains back then that dealt with the radiation for the entire mission!


Ah, the van Allen radiation issue....you're right, of course, we did have people with brains back then! This is essentially the entire worn out issue in a nutshell.   You'd be amazed at the hoops we had to jump through on the radiation issue.

Quote

...to reproduce days of coverage of multiple missions
in 1/6th gravity conditions would have been monumental to create in any studio.


This rather reasonable logic was also something that escaped many people.

Quote

A final point that would be very hard to fake is when the ascent stage of the lunar module lifted off of it's base,
the debris flew off of it and scattered in a manner that showed no wind resistance for the type of material it
was.


That too!

Quote

If it was faked, I would have to say that it was a more
monumental job doing the fake (as an earlier poster said) than it would have been to go
to the moon itself..


You would be right.
Neil Armstrong would also agree with you.


You might be interested to read through the original and massive Moon Hoax thread, which today is buried on page 25 of this Conspiracies section of the board.   Over 4000 posts, which probably covered every aspect of the Moon hoax...





#71    Rusich

Rusich

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 37 posts
  • Joined:05 Apr 2007

Posted 05 April 2007 - 06:33 PM

Why after the debarkation of astronauts is stopped Moon study? The Moon  the whole have studied, it not interesting?


#72    Magikman

Magikman

    Most Exalted member of the first 15

  • Member
  • 6,280 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001

Posted 05 April 2007 - 06:42 PM

It would be interesting to get your perspective, Rusich. What is/was the opinion of people in your country as to whether the moon landing was faked? I hope I'm not being too forward, you needn't mention where you are from if you don't want to make it known.

MM

Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. ~ Carl Sagan

"...man has an irrepressible tendency to read meaning into the buzzing confusion of sights and sounds impinging on his senses; and where no agreed meaning can be found, he will provide it out of his own imagination." ~ Arthur Koestler

#73    phunk

phunk

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 423 posts
  • Joined:14 Sep 2006

Posted 05 April 2007 - 06:53 PM

Quote

Why after the debarkation of astronauts is stopped Moon study? The Moon  the whole have studied, it not interesting?


Study of the moon never stopped, only manned missions.  Those stopped because they were incredibly expensive and the budget was taken and given to the shuttle program.


#74    chris0871

chris0871

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 167 posts
  • Joined:24 Oct 2006

Posted 05 April 2007 - 09:26 PM

Quote

Study of the moon never stopped, only manned missions.  Those stopped because they were incredibly expensive and the budget was taken and given to the shuttle program.


how about a new modern probe orbiting the moon taking high res pictures of the nine or so landing sites on the surface of the moon so we can end this ***SNIP*** debate . see it's very simple why dont we have a satalite like that ? maybe japan will get there probe up there soon or China or maybe India...seems there is a lot still we can learn from the moon and our wonderful government.

Edited by Waspie_Dwarf, 06 April 2007 - 04:29 PM.
the language filters are there for a reason. Do not try to get round them.


#75    Obviousman

Obviousman

    Spaced out and plane crazy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,650 posts
  • Joined:27 Dec 2006

Posted 05 April 2007 - 11:21 PM

Quote

how about a new modern probe orbiting the moon taking high res pictures of the nine or so landing sites on the surface of the moon so we can end this ***SNIP*** debate . see it's very simple why dont we have a satalite like that ? maybe japan will get there probe up there soon or China or maybe India...seems there is a lot still we can learn from the moon and our wonderful government.


As people have remarked, a lunar mission is expensive and so one that is going to carry a hi-res imaging system has to be justified. There have been mapping satellites using IR, UV, radar, etc. There have been polar missions to look for evidence of water. There have been missions to study the gravity / magnetic fields. Other missions looked for commercial exploration possibilities.

As you say, perhaps future missions might give us images - the Japanese SELENE, planned for AUG 07, is carrying a terrain camera with a 10m resolution and a High Definition TV camera. You are not going to be able to see footprints in the soil but the images should be able to show something of the Apollo artifacts.

Edited by Waspie_Dwarf, 06 April 2007 - 04:30 PM.
removed bad language from quote.