Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

McCain making up history and CBS admits


  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

#31    Lt_Ripley

Lt_Ripley

    Forum Divinity

  • Banned
  • 20,036 posts
  • Joined:09 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 July 2008 - 06:36 PM

danielost on Jul 24 2008, 02:18 PM, said:

Saddam didn't just have us confused.  He had his own government confused.  When we were building up to attack Iraq threatened to use those wmd's on our troops.


yes and empty threat ......

Here Feb. 2001 powell  and rice in July 2001 - both say saddam was not a threat and has no capability.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oN5yvoIsnnE

here powell admitted he was 'misled' ( lied) about wmds. to the UN and to the US.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZTLmOoPzjs


#32    Lt_Ripley

Lt_Ripley

    Forum Divinity

  • Banned
  • 20,036 posts
  • Joined:09 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 July 2008 - 06:40 PM

See DOZENS more examples of FOX NEWS BIAS at http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list...

When Republican presidential candidate John McCain got in a fight with the New York Times editorial page this week, Fox News was right there to stick to the McCain campaign talking points even when confronted with contradicting facts. To show you what I mean, I put together the several clips in this video.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhyedUq6s8Y

spin fox spin

Edited by Lt_Ripley, 24 July 2008 - 06:41 PM.


#33    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,341 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 24 July 2008 - 06:47 PM

Lt_Ripley on Jul 24 2008, 01:40 PM, said:

See DOZENS more examples of FOX NEWS BIAS at http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list...

When Republican presidential candidate John McCain got in a fight with the New York Times editorial page this week, Fox News was right there to stick to the McCain campaign talking points even when confronted with contradicting facts. To show you what I mean, I put together the several clips in this video.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhyedUq6s8Y

spin fox spin




What other time table do they want.

I am a Mormon.  If I don't use Mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other Mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the Mormon faith. Thanks for caring and if you don't peace be with you.

#34    Oderint

Oderint

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,651 posts
  • Joined:21 Feb 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Trondheim

  • Buggere Alle this for a Larke.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 06:53 PM

Lt_Ripley on Jul 24 2008, 04:51 AM, said:

Got that? If you think 2006 came before 2007, you’re somehow showing disrespect for the troops.

laugh.gif Brilliant, Quote of the Year candidate! laugh.gif

The Legend of the Ice people
Reviews here
Formerly known as Prawus


#35    Celumnaz

Celumnaz

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,039 posts
  • Joined:22 Aug 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

  • I don't know what I don't know.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 07:04 PM

Lt_Ripley on Jul 24 2008, 01:40 PM, said:

To show you what I mean, I put together the several clips in this video.

You're a stay at home dad?  Now I'm confused.  LiberalViewer (the one that posted the video) is a stay at home dad.


#36    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,341 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 24 July 2008 - 07:09 PM

__Kratos__ on Jul 24 2008, 09:53 AM, said:

But they would still be contained mostly and tens of thousands of people would still be alive and in one piece...



key word.



Saddam was allowing 100,000+ a year to starve to death so that he could support his palaces.



Lets see civilian deaths during this war 175,000 give or take.   Number of deaths if Saddam had been left in power 500,000, not including the ones he would have had killed.  You decide.

I am a Mormon.  If I don't use Mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other Mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the Mormon faith. Thanks for caring and if you don't peace be with you.

#37    __Kratos__

__Kratos__

    -Staring-

  • Member
  • 25,876 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inside the moon

  • As darkness falls, night unfolds ebony wings to wrap the world in it's dark embrace.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 07:32 PM

danielost on Jul 24 2008, 02:09 PM, said:

key word.



Saddam was allowing 100,000+ a year to starve to death so that he could support his palaces.



Lets see civilian deaths during this war 175,000 give or take.   Number of deaths if Saddam had been left in power 500,000, not including the ones he would have had killed.  You decide.


Not our problem. If it was we would be all over the world stopping backwater countries from killing the masses. Though we are not. Saddam was a real butthole and I've watched his hanging a few times... The world is a slightly better place with him as a corpse.

But now it is our problem thanks to us going in there and blowing the country to pieces.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." ~Philip K. Dick

"Passion, peace. Strength, knowledge. Power, serenity. Victory, harmony. Freedom, the Force." ~Ashara Zavros

#38    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,625 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 07:52 PM

__Kratos__ on Jul 24 2008, 09:21 PM, said:

In November 2005, American commanders held a breakthrough meeting with top Sunni chiefs in Ramadi, hoping to lure them away from the insurgents' fold. The sheiks responded positively, promising cooperation and men for a police force that was then virtually nonexistent.
Source


You mean the guy who was barred from entry to the US a few weeks later? The same guy who did more to discourage the other Sheiks from joining the anti al-Qaeda campaign? And who, buy joining the coalition made the best CIA asset in Iraq quit (Harith al Dhari), because he wanted nothing to do with a turn-coat?

Sorry, but that was no real attempt, that was a propaganda coup. And it back-fired.





A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#39    Dr. D

Dr. D

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,275 posts
  • Joined:15 Mar 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mexico

  • I love being me even though sometimes I'm still a stranger.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 08:03 PM

danielost on Jul 24 2008, 04:21 AM, said:

If the democrats had their way alquida would be ruling the usa.  As long as they let the democrats stay in power.


What does that have to do with a conservative candidate so cloned to Bush that he makes the same ridiculous verbal errors?


#40    __Kratos__

__Kratos__

    -Staring-

  • Member
  • 25,876 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inside the moon

  • As darkness falls, night unfolds ebony wings to wrap the world in it's dark embrace.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 08:04 PM

questionmark on Jul 24 2008, 02:52 PM, said:

You mean the guy who was barred from entry to the US a few weeks later? The same guy who did more to discourage the other Sheiks from joining the anti al-Qaeda campaign? And who, buy joining the coalition made the best CIA asset in Iraq quit (Harith al Dhari), because he wanted nothing to do with a turn-coat?

Sorry, but that was no real attempt, that was a propaganda coup. And it back-fired.


What? Sheik Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi was assassinated for his fighting against Al-Qaeda.

Abdul Sattar Abu Risha (Arabic: عبد الستار أبو ريشة‎) - Sheikh Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi ad-Dulaimi الشيخ عبد الستار الريشاوي الدليمي - (born 1972 September 13, 2007) was the leader of an alliance of Iraqi Sunni Arab tribe that opposed al-Qaeda in Iraq, and son of the chief of the 160,000 strong Albu Risha clan, a subset of the Dulaim tribe, the largest and most important tribe in Iraq. He was assassinated, shortly after becoming an ally of the Iraqi government through forming an organisation of fellow tribal chiefs called the Sahawat al-Anbar or the Anbar Awakening Council based in Anbar's provincial capital of Ramadi, some 70 miles (110 km) west of Baghdad.

Leader of the Anbar Awakening Council

During the early part of the insurgency following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, as al-Qa'ida's fighters tightened their grip on Ramadi, it is reported that they became increasingly repressive and challenged the tribal leaders' power. Soon they were kidnapping and beheading innocent people as part of a campaign of extortion and intimidation.[citation needed]

    "We began to see what they were actually doing in Anbar province. They were not respecting us or honouring us in any way, their tactics were not acceptable." - Shaykh Abdulsattar, March 2007

During the late summer of 2006 Shaykh Abdulsattar began enlisting his fellow shaykhs in Sahawat al-Anbar and encouraging members of his tribe to join the local police force. Since June 2006 they have contributed a reported 1,300 members to the Ramadi police[citation needed]. Many of the new newly friendly leaders are believed to have at least tacitly supported the insurgency in the past, though al-Rishawi said he never did. His movement, also known as the Anbar Awakening, now counts 41 clans from Anbar, though al-Rishawi acknowledges that some groups in the province have yet to join.[1]

Sheikh Abdulsattar Abu Risha discussed and persuade Anbar Sheikhs to Stopped fighting the American army and expel and fighting al-Qa'ida, persuaded the shaykhs of Anbar clans of Albu Nimr and Albu Fahd and Albu Mahals and Albu Assaf and Albu Issa.

Shaykh Abdulsattar Abu Risha with 60 thousand man from his tribe, in 40 days expelled Al Qaeda from Anbar.

Source


"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." ~Philip K. Dick

"Passion, peace. Strength, knowledge. Power, serenity. Victory, harmony. Freedom, the Force." ~Ashara Zavros

#41    Dr. D

Dr. D

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,275 posts
  • Joined:15 Mar 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mexico

  • I love being me even though sometimes I'm still a stranger.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 08:06 PM

The Silver Thong on Jul 24 2008, 07:09 AM, said:

I like Macains last statement. "I would rather lose the election than lose the war."


I don't think he has much choice about either.


#42    Dr. D

Dr. D

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,275 posts
  • Joined:15 Mar 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mexico

  • I love being me even though sometimes I'm still a stranger.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 08:08 PM

danielost on Jul 24 2008, 08:09 PM, said:

Lets see civilian deaths during this war 175,000 give or take.   Number of deaths if Saddam had been left in power 500,000, not including the ones he would have had killed.  You decide.


Are you counting the 200,000 to 500,000 children under the age of five who died because of the refusal to lift the U.N. sanction on basic medical goods?


#43    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,625 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 08:11 PM

__Kratos__ on Jul 24 2008, 11:04 PM, said:

What? Sheik Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi was assassinated for his fighting against Al-Qaeda.

Abdul Sattar Abu Risha (Arabic: عبد الستار أبو ريشة‎) - Sheikh Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi ad-Dulaimi الشيخ عبد الستار الريشاوي الدليمي - (born 1972 September 13, 2007) was the leader of an alliance of Iraqi Sunni Arab tribe that opposed al-Qaeda in Iraq, and son of the chief of the 160,000 strong Albu Risha clan, a subset of the Dulaim tribe, the largest and most important tribe in Iraq. He was assassinated, shortly after becoming an ally of the Iraqi government through forming an organisation of fellow tribal chiefs called the Sahawat al-Anbar or the Anbar Awakening Council based in Anbar's provincial capital of Ramadi, some 70 miles (110 km) west of Baghdad.

Leader of the Anbar Awakening Council

During the early part of the insurgency following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, as al-Qa'ida's fighters tightened their grip on Ramadi, it is reported that they became increasingly repressive and challenged the tribal leaders' power. Soon they were kidnapping and beheading innocent people as part of a campaign of extortion and intimidation.[citation needed]

    "We began to see what they were actually doing in Anbar province. They were not respecting us or honouring us in any way, their tactics were not acceptable." - Shaykh Abdulsattar, March 2007

During the late summer of 2006 Shaykh Abdulsattar began enlisting his fellow shaykhs in Sahawat al-Anbar and encouraging members of his tribe to join the local police force. Since June 2006 they have contributed a reported 1,300 members to the Ramadi police[citation needed]. Many of the new newly friendly leaders are believed to have at least tacitly supported the insurgency in the past, though al-Rishawi said he never did. His movement, also known as the Anbar Awakening, now counts 41 clans from Anbar, though al-Rishawi acknowledges that some groups in the province have yet to join.[1]

Sheikh Abdulsattar Abu Risha discussed and persuade Anbar Sheikhs to Stopped fighting the American army and expel and fighting al-Qa'ida, persuaded the shaykhs of Anbar clans of Albu Nimr and Albu Fahd and Albu Mahals and Albu Assaf and Albu Issa.

Shaykh Abdulsattar Abu Risha with 60 thousand man from his tribe, in 40 days expelled Al Qaeda from Anbar.

Source


Yeh... see his obituary in the sun

http://www.nysun.com/editorials/abdul-satt...-rishawi/62642/

That at the end, and two years after the initial attempt there was finally a breakthrough had nothing to do with the 2005 attempt. And as you show there, there were no results until 2007 ... after the surge.



A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#44    __Kratos__

__Kratos__

    -Staring-

  • Member
  • 25,876 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inside the moon

  • As darkness falls, night unfolds ebony wings to wrap the world in it's dark embrace.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 08:19 PM

questionmark on Jul 24 2008, 03:11 PM, said:

Yeh... see his obituary in the sun

http://www.nysun.com/editorials/abdul-satt...-rishawi/62642/

That at the end, and two years after the initial attempt there was finally a breakthrough had nothing to do with the 2005 attempt. And as you show there, there were no results until 2007 ... after the surge.


From the BBC:

In September 2006, angered by the killings of both his father and two brothers by al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Risha approached the US military about forming an alliance to fight the Sunni extremist group.

The US agreed to provide funding and soon began to train members of the sheikh's tribe and placed a M1 tank outside his compound to provide protection.
Source

He was moving against them long before the surge and was even fighting against them before the surge.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." ~Philip K. Dick

"Passion, peace. Strength, knowledge. Power, serenity. Victory, harmony. Freedom, the Force." ~Ashara Zavros

#45    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,625 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 24 July 2008 - 08:29 PM

__Kratos__ on Jul 24 2008, 11:19 PM, said:

From the BBC:

In September 2006, angered by the killings of both his father and two brothers by al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Risha approached the US military about forming an alliance to fight the Sunni extremist group.

The US agreed to provide funding and soon began to train members of the sheikh's tribe and placed a M1 tank outside his compound to provide protection.
Source

He was moving against them long before the surge and was even fighting against them before the surge.


Yeh... and it was celebrated with big fanfare when after the surge the guy finally was convinced:

Sunni Sheiks Join Fight Vs. Insurgency

By TODD PITMAN
The Associated Press
Sunday, March 25, 2007; 3:39 PM

RAMADI, Iraq -- Not long ago it would have been unthinkable: a Sunni sheik allying himself publicly with American forces in a xenophobic city at the epicenter of Iraq's Sunni insurgency.

Today, there is no mistaking whose side Sheik Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi is on. Outside his walled home, a U.S. tank is on permanent guard beside a clutch of towering date palms and a protective dirt berm.

The 36-year-old sheik is leading a growing movement of Sunni tribesmen who have turned against al-Qaida-linked insurgents in Anbar province. The dramatic shift in alliances may have done more in a few months to ease daily street battles and undercut the insurgency here than American forces have achieved in years with arms.

The American commander responsible for Ramadi, Col. John W. Charlton, said the newly friendly sheiks, combined with an aggressive counterinsurgency strategy and the presence of thousands of new Sunni police on the streets, have helped cut attacks in the city by half in recent months.

In November 2005, American commanders held a breakthrough meeting with top Sunni chiefs in Ramadi, hoping to lure them away from the insurgents' fold. The sheiks responded positively, promising cooperation and men for a police force that was then virtually nonexistent.

But in January 2006 a suicide bomber attacked a police recruiting drive, killing 70 people. Insurgents killed at least four sheiks for cooperating with the Americans, and many others fled.

The killings left the effort in limbo, until a turning point; insurgents killed a prominent sheik last year and refused to let family members bury the body for four days, enraging Sunni tribesmen, said U.S. Lt. Col. Miciotto Johnson, who heads the 1st Battalion, 77th Armored Regiment and visits al-Rishawi frequently in western Ramadi.

Al-Rishawi, whose father and three brothers were killed by al-Qaida assassins, said insurgents were "killing innocent people, anyone suspected of opposing them. They brought us nothing but destruction and we finally said, enough is enough."

Al-Rishawi founded the Anbar Salvation Council in September with dozens of Sunni tribes. Many of the new newly friendly leaders are believed to have at least tacitly supported the insurgency in the past, though al-Rishawi said he never did.

"I was always against these terrorists," al-Rishawi said in an interview inside his American-guarded compound, adjusting a pistol holstered around his waist. "They brainwashed people into thinking Americans were against them. They said foreigners wanted to occupy our land and destroy our mosques. They told us, 'We'll wage a jihad. We'll help you defeat them.'"

Source: The Washington Post

Fact is and remains that AFTER the surge DOD finally set on the Sheiks. Not BEFORE as McCain wants to make us believe. And fact is too, that the surge was as useful as tits on a bull before they set on the Sheiks.

And make no mistake, the Sheiks will as easily switch siodes if somebody else offers more money...they are only on one side: Their own.



A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users