Jack Burton on Sep 4 2008, 07:51 AM, said:
The monkey on a typewriter theory is bogus... an infinite sequence of 26 randomly generated letters doesn't have to contain an edition of Hamlet just because it is constructed of the same 26 letters. Every letter is randomly generated and completely unrelated to the preceding letter, therefore no assumptions can be made about any patterns in said sequence. Apply that logic to multi-dimensional reality, and the probability of the same particles of matter that created you finding their way back together again to create the same exact "you" is too small to fathom with the human brain. I'm sure it would take the death and birth of many subsequent universes to even approach mathmatical likelihood. Interesting thought, though.
Agreed.
If matter is infinite, then we have always existed and always will.
Even if all the particles found their way back to create another 'you', you could never be the same person as you are now, if you consider sociological and environmental aspects.
But, if we're talking about infinity, can we move on to the possibility that particles will create an identical universe to the one we're living in now?
And, if we're talking about shifting particles, that means that we are not the same person we were several minutes earlier. We are constantly shifting beings that are perceived to be stable. Does this mean that life is just a "random" mish-mash of matter that could disperse at any moment?\
Someone help me out here