BlindMessiah on Sep 6 2008, 10:08 PM, said:
Wait, are they seriously for this plan?
Do you have a source for that?
Well you can decide
"The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Courtís long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individualís right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms."
Source and full report