Cloverfield 2 There's another one?
#1
Posted 13 June 2009 - 10:12 PM
Well as you are proberlly aware that the cloverfield monster was a baby(look in dvd extras and wikipedia).
So the question is, is still alive? or a bigger cloverfield comes along?
Well i have been doing some homework over the past week and at last have found some...evidence of a sequel or prequel.
I found this of www.filmofilia.com which is like a movie website. Anyway there's some intresting pictures and a document, which looks to be before the monster attacks New York City.
Here is one of th photos but i think it's the parasites feeding on the ocean floor.picture 1
It shows a mini sub looking at some parasites.
The next photo appears to be a mini cloverfield which appears to be attacking some sort of underwater steel platform.
picture 2
This is the start of my findings and later i will show you another picture but of what a dead whale that cloverfield has being eating.
So the question is, is still alive? or a bigger cloverfield comes along?
Well i have been doing some homework over the past week and at last have found some...evidence of a sequel or prequel.
I found this of www.filmofilia.com which is like a movie website. Anyway there's some intresting pictures and a document, which looks to be before the monster attacks New York City.
Here is one of th photos but i think it's the parasites feeding on the ocean floor.picture 1
It shows a mini sub looking at some parasites.
The next photo appears to be a mini cloverfield which appears to be attacking some sort of underwater steel platform.
picture 2
This is the start of my findings and later i will show you another picture but of what a dead whale that cloverfield has being eating.
#4
Posted 13 June 2009 - 11:01 PM
i was like "OMG!
" at the first one. id love to see a second one. im determined to find out what exactly that thing was or thing's

it was a suprisingly good film
it was a suprisingly good film
This post has been edited by Dr Alien: 13 June 2009 - 11:02 PM
"Keep britain tidy, bin a chav!"
*Please enter sarcasm here*
*Please enter sarcasm here*
#5
Posted 13 June 2009 - 11:18 PM
Wow....history (of past stupidity) DOES repeat itself....
#8
Posted 14 June 2009 - 12:47 AM
JJ Abrams confirmed this awhile ago I thought?
He was talking about how they could possibly do a movie where another group of people had a camera rolling too. The idea was that in today's tech filled world, there's going to be a lot of people that you can see have stories.
<SPOILER (yeah, I hate spoiling things>
I've also heard speculation that the 2 at the end of the first didn't die in the end and might continue their story somehow.
I'm all for a Cloverfield 2 as long as it isn't as boring as Star Trek is (hate me all you want, it felt like a long boring episode of LOST! haha)
He was talking about how they could possibly do a movie where another group of people had a camera rolling too. The idea was that in today's tech filled world, there's going to be a lot of people that you can see have stories.
<SPOILER (yeah, I hate spoiling things>
I've also heard speculation that the 2 at the end of the first didn't die in the end and might continue their story somehow.
I'm all for a Cloverfield 2 as long as it isn't as boring as Star Trek is (hate me all you want, it felt like a long boring episode of LOST! haha)
#9
Posted 14 June 2009 - 01:47 AM
J Gab on Jun 14 2009, 01:47 AM, said:
JJ Abrams confirmed this awhile ago I thought?
He was talking about how they could possibly do a movie where another group of people had a camera rolling too. The idea was that in today's tech filled world, there's going to be a lot of people that you can see have stories.
<SPOILER (yeah, I hate spoiling things>
I've also heard speculation that the 2 at the end of the first didn't die in the end and might continue their story somehow.
I'm all for a Cloverfield 2 as long as it isn't as boring as Star Trek is (hate me all you want, it felt like a long boring episode of LOST! haha)
He was talking about how they could possibly do a movie where another group of people had a camera rolling too. The idea was that in today's tech filled world, there's going to be a lot of people that you can see have stories.
<SPOILER (yeah, I hate spoiling things>
I've also heard speculation that the 2 at the end of the first didn't die in the end and might continue their story somehow.
I'm all for a Cloverfield 2 as long as it isn't as boring as Star Trek is (hate me all you want, it felt like a long boring episode of LOST! haha)
Star Trek felt like Lost? Not to derail the topic, but what exactly did you find to be similar? I'm an avid Lost fan, and I saw Star Trek, and I don't see any similarities.
#12
Posted 14 June 2009 - 03:03 AM
That was a bad fim and to peek into the relams of that film is boring
But the pics are nice
Thanks
B???
But the pics are nice
Thanks
B???
#14
Posted 14 June 2009 - 03:57 AM
Pol_Pot_Lives_Again on Jun 14 2009, 02:31 PM, said:
What was so bad about it?
I'm sure it was the filming style, that seems to be what most people have a problem with.
I went into the cinema expecting a piece of ****, and left feeling like I had been thoroughly entertained for an hour and a half. Shotgun sequel
"There ain't no heroes no villians, ain't no pleasure in killing, just the smoke from the cap peeling a man with no feeling, Tear Drops and Closed Caskets"
Sign In
Register
Help
Board Index


Top
MultiQuote











