[SRCivic98]

hey ya'll I'm posting this topic to see what you folks think about the new Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen and who did you think was the coolest transformer ( rather they be Decepticon or Autobot ). Also, do you think the new film was as good as the first film or better or not as good. And finally, do you think the third installment to the movie saga will be as good as parts one and two? Well that's all for me folks, looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and comments.

[SpiderCyde]

I havent seen it yet, but I want to. I loved the first one, megan fox is smoking hot. I heard the 2nd movie wasnt that great though, hope that's wrong. A lot of people are saying the new gijoe movie sucks too...i also hope thats wrong. lol

This post has been edited by SpIdErCyDe: 01 July 2009 - 08:49 PM

[Ash Doro]

I liked the Deceptionicon who was disguised as the SR Blackbird. Its a bit of humor after the seriousness of what happened before Sam went to find him.

I think its a good film, possibly better than the first one, because they don't have to build up, this is such and such a character, and all that, its humor and action from the off.

For the third? I will deffo watch it, it has to have a epic conclusion though.

Fave Quote?

"What Planet am i On?"
"Earth..."
"Earth? Terrible name for a planet... might as well have called it dirt..."

[Splodgenessabounds]

IMO opinion it's a load of crap. Have you guys Imaginationland? Here's an excerpt...

General: Mr. Bay, what's your idea to stop the terrorists?
Bay: We start by making a big CG building, then a meteor chrashes into it, CRAWGHHH!!!
General: Those aren't ideas, those are special effects!!!
Bay: I don't understand the difference.

Transformers 2, CG building gets destroyed by a fireball. *facepalm*. This guy has no shame.

All he knows is special effects and how to make Megan Fox bend over things in hot pants. How this guy survives is beyond me. The biggest crime is that Spielberg, one of the greatest directors and innovators in film history, hires him!!! Again!!!

If Spielberg actually wanted to make a good Transformers film and not just a means to make money, then he'd sack Bay, make the film himself and give us something other than Megan Fox to dribble over.

If you guys like the film though then cool.

This post has been edited by Splodgenessabounds: 01 July 2009 - 09:08 PM

[BlindMessiah]

The movie consists of four things: good special effects, poor plot, poor acting, over done sexual innuendo. It's marketed to kids, yet they have dogs having sex, robots humping Megan Fox's leg, Sam trying to sleep with another girl other than his girlfriend, his mother running around campus high on drugs announcing that he lost his virginity, strong language etc. Once again, this film was marketed to children, and filled the theaters with children as young as six or seven.

[Beckys_Mom]

BlindMessiah on Jul 1 2009, 11:59 PM, said:

The movie consists of four things: good special effects, poor plot, poor acting, over done sexual innuendo. It's marketed to kids, yet they have dogs having sex, robots humping Megan Fox's leg, Sam trying to sleep with another girl other than his girlfriend, his mother running around campus high on drugs announcing that he lost his virginity, strong language etc. Once again, this film was marketed to children, and filled the theaters with children as young as six or seven.

You BM are usually straight up with movie reviews............after reading this.....I don't htink I wanna see it now lol

[I.C.U.P.]

Look. It's a Michael Bay movie.

If you aren't going to see explosions and robot......

then don't go.

[Ebonykrow]

BlindMessiah on Jul 1 2009, 06:59 PM, said:

The movie consists of four things: good special effects, poor plot, poor acting, over done sexual innuendo. It's marketed to kids, yet they have dogs having sex, robots humping Megan Fox's leg, Sam trying to sleep with another girl other than his girlfriend, his mother running around campus high on drugs announcing that he lost his virginity, strong language etc. Once again, this film was marketed to children, and filled the theaters with children as young as six or seven.

Which is exactly why I prefer movies like Night at the Museum. It's an appropriate kid's movie, I think, and certainly in comparison to that review of it. Kids need more movies like NATM.

I won't be seeing Transformers either. :/

This post has been edited by Ebonykrow: 02 July 2009 - 06:41 PM

[Moon Minion]

BlindMessiah on Jul 1 2009, 11:59 PM, said:

The movie consists of four things: good special effects, poor plot, poor acting, over done sexual innuendo. It's marketed to kids, yet they have dogs having sex, robots humping Megan Fox's leg, Sam trying to sleep with another girl other than his girlfriend, his mother running around campus high on drugs announcing that he lost his virginity, strong language etc. Once again, this film was marketed to children, and filled the theaters with children as young as six or seven.

What!!! I mean yeesh I didn't mind the first movie, but have they really gone that over the top with the sexual innuendo in this one? It's a disgrace to the series. Whatever happened to good old cartoon Disney movies...*sighs* nope I'm not gonna waste my money on it.

Ebonykrow on Jul 2 2009, 07:40 PM, said:

Which is exactly why I prefer movies like Night at the Museum. It's an appropriate kid's movie, I think, and certainly in comparison to that review of it. Kids need more movies like NATM.

I won't be seeing Transformers either. :/

I agree, I personally think childrens movies have really lost their charm and lessons! Why don't kids movies have lessons anymore???

This post has been edited by Moon Minion: 02 July 2009 - 06:50 PM

[SRCivic98]

I.C.U.P. on Jul 2 2009, 01:44 PM, said:

Look. It's a Michael Bay movie.

If you aren't going to see explosions and robot......

then don't go.

I loved the movie because it did have a little more sense of humor behind of it and it is more targeted at Teenagers than kids that's five or six, I don't know where ya'll think it's targeted at five or six year olds because the movie is also rate PG-13. I remember when I went to go see it, there was more adults and teenagers in the theaters than little kids. As far as the new GI Joe movie coming out, I'll probably check it out too because of where I watched it as a kid too. There is a lot of fighting going on in the film and a little bit more language in some spots but it's still targeted at Teenagers and young adults rather than little kids. Now Night at the Museum 2 was pretty funny too and enjoyable. It's more of a all around movie but not as good as the first one. The main thing to remember when going to see any film is to watch it your self before taking anyone else with you and to think about the rating of the movie before taking someone else too. But I still respect everyone else's opinions. I too thought that when Sam found JetFire that his sense of humor was pretty funny about Earth. Skids and Wheelie fighting all the time and making jokes was pretty good too.

[Ebonykrow]

Well, I don't think rating has anything to do with what age group is going to go see it... Transformers is something a lot of little boys are going to like, and then they will want to go and see the movie too. Hell, I thought Sweeney Todd was going to be an adult movie. I went to go see it first day and there were four year olds in the theater. Not even trying to joke.

This post has been edited by Ebonykrow: 02 July 2009 - 10:52 PM

[D1CKY D1AMOND]

Moon Minion on Jul 2 2009, 12:49 PM, said:

What!!! I mean yeesh I didn't mind the first movie, but have they really gone that over the top with the sexual innuendo in this one? It's a disgrace to the series. Whatever happened to good old cartoon Disney movies...*sighs* nope I'm not gonna waste my money on it.



I agree, I personally think childrens movies have really lost their charm and lessons! Why don't kids movies have lessons anymore???

Why do parents rely on movies made for guys over 25 to teach their kids to do the right thing?

[Alex01]

It is the typical teen movie, but this time with robots at war and very nice special effects. Other than that the movie has very funny moments and the opposite. I liked the story, it's quite complete in my opinion, but again it's the very typical teen movie, just with some sci-fi.

[Moon Minion]

D1CKY D1AMOND on Jul 3 2009, 10:20 AM, said:

Why do parents rely on movies made for guys over 25 to teach their kids to do the right thing?

Oh pleaassseee mate, who says it was made for the over 25? You and I both know that kids are the ones spilling in the dollars to see this stuff. That and it practically comes from toys and a kids cartoon series...they have to chuck everything in the gutter don't they?
Also no one ever said parents solely rely on movies to teach there kids lessons, but it was nice when movies once had them.

[Ebonykrow]

Moon Minion on Jul 3 2009, 10:26 AM, said:

Oh pleaassseee mate, who says it was made for the over 25? You and I both know that kids are the ones spilling in the dollars to see this stuff. That and it practically comes from toys and a kids cartoon series...they have to chuck everything in the gutter don't they?
Also no one ever said parents solely rely on movies to teach there kids lessons, but it was nice when movies once had them.

Agreed. Everything you said.

It was a kid's television series. Period. A Saturday morning cartoon for little boys. Adults are going to see the movie because of Fox, sure, but you absolutely cannot forget the little kids that are going to see it because it makes their favorite cartoon come to life. It's a bad way to start them off. Get them off on movies like this while they're young, and when they're fourteen they'll go straight for movies like Tropic Thunder for a laugh. Fourteen year olds do not need to watch Tropic Thunder, for the same reason six year olds do not need to watch Transformers: Revenge... :/

I miss the days of classical Disney. Brutal stories with a harsh truth and reality, strong lessons and morals, realistic, powerful characters. Sigh. Gone are the days.