Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums: More Best Evidence for aliens - Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Forum guidelines

Please respect the opinions of others. The "Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon" forum covers some sensitive and controversial areas and it is important that participants avoid uncivil behaviour. This means no flaming, no trolling, no flamebaiting and no personal attacks against other members.

Please try to keep an open mind, there is little point in posting in this section if you are unwilling to consider any opposing viewpoints. If you are unable to discuss issues without becoming rude and offensive towards anyone who does not share your opinions or beliefs then this section of the forums is not for you.

Members are also asked to avoid copying and pasting huge amounts of text from other web sites to support an argument. One or two quoted paragraphs and a source link are more than sufficient, and always include your own opinion to go along with any quoted material you use.

Full forum rules and guidelines can be found - Here.
  • 339 Pages +
  • «
  • 337
  • 338
  • 339
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • You cannot start a new topic

More Best Evidence for aliens Are they really here? Rate Topic: ***-- 8 Votes

#5071 User is offline   Czero 101 


  • Poltergeist
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,149
  • Joined: 24-December 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver, BC

  • We are all made of thermonuclear waste material

Posted Today, 06:12 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 20 November 2009 - 07:31 PM, said:

The shape definitely wasn't a typical description of a conventional satellite.

Avoidance of the star tracker imagery issue noted.

View Postskyeagle409, on 20 November 2009 - 07:26 PM, said:

Thank you. Seems the skeptics are not aware that I know much more than they think.

There's a huge difference between what you claim to know and what you can actually prove.

Quote

They need to understand that we have multiple surveillance systems in place that can cross-check one another, hence my assertion that the UFO was not a satellite

Still waiting for you to provide any form of proof that any other surveillance asset was involved in this event.

Quote

and that in addition that NORAD lost track of that UFO as it headed back into deep space from which it came and not in orbit, which underlines the fact that no satellite was involved.

Sorry, but your word and the alleged word of Regehr - who has almost as little credibility AND evidence in regards to this issue - are less convincing than you and your cheerleader Ra believe them to be.




Cz
"Show us the NORAD and Aerojet reports that you say exist, have been released and prove that what the DSP satellite detected in 1984 was not another satellite."

The other question Skyeagle cannot answer.
  • 339 Pages +
  • «
  • 337
  • 338
  • 339
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • You cannot start a new topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 1 anonymous users