Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Was the moon landing faked?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
33 replies to this topic

#16    Universal Absurdity

Universal Absurdity

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,592 posts
  • Joined:12 Sep 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:everywhere

  • You wont win.

Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:12 AM

QUOTE
I require pictures of the common backdrops to know what your speaking, if it is what I think it is NASA readily admits clerical mis-titling of two frmes taken 3 minutes apart if this is what you are referring to.


that is possible, i havent heard that excuse yet.

i see you have no argument to my main point about the film.
true they have some moon rocks, and hey, they may have even went to the moon
but those pics are complete bs. no film could take that

Ű∩ίvệѓα|ΛЬşűяđĬŧỵ

Founder Of The Animated Avatar Workshop
43 things

#17    Chauncy

Chauncy

    Quixotic

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,033 posts
  • Joined:13 May 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

  • "Sanity may be madness but the maddest of all is to see life as it is and not as it should be." (from) Don Quixote

Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:21 AM

Well when it comes to the greatest scientific minds and you saying "no film could take those pics" I'll go with the scientific minds!

What about your evidence..... its complete and utter nonsense. The van Allen belts are regions above the Earth's surface where the Earth's magnetic field has trapped particles of the solar wind. An unprotected man would indeed get a lethal dose of radiation, if he stayed there long enough. Actually, the spaceship traveled through the belts pretty quickly, getting past them in an hour or so. There simply wasn't enough time to get a lethal dose, and, as a matter of fact, the metal hull of the spaceship did indeed block most of the radiation.

As long as men are free to ask what they must, free to say what they think, free to think what they will, freedom can never be lost and science can never regress.
Julius Robert Oppenheimer. (1904-1967)
Posted Image

#18    tkr9

tkr9

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 57 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2004

Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:28 AM

Try cameras designed to operate in outer space. Y'know, a bit tougher than yer run of the mill kodak disposable. Hubble's never had any trouble either.

Van Allen aside I can see no reasonable argument once you've been through my list that 'we' or rather you, or any Americans here, never landed on the moon. The Chinese are going soon, and are not faking it. Eventually we will all go there again, perhaps even for our hols. original.gif  Then we can toddle along to the landing sites and find out for ourselves.

Heat up any film to the extremes yes you will damage it, but then you'd damage the astranauts too. They were safe in a pod, with the film, not skimming along the atmosphere on a tea tray.

Dear God I am getting flippant.   w00t.gif Two in the morning and I have a job interview at eleven. Must dash.

As for the lunar landing sights, because of the vast distance to the peaks in question, one could circumnavigate the lander, take the same image and the lander, behind you, would not be in shot.

Any more questions before I go to beddybyes?

Edited by tkr9, 18 May 2004 - 02:30 AM.

We are heathens who worship an idol, that we keep for our pleasure and pride, slaves to the saddle and bridle, but kings of the earth when we ride! Ode to Horses.

#19    The Gryphon

The Gryphon

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 118 posts
  • Joined:05 May 2004
  • Location:The Great Pacific Northwest

  • There are no such things as accidents, only plans that others have made and failed to tell you about!!

Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:30 AM

QUOTE (UniversalAbsurdity @ May 18 2004, 03:12 AM)

but those pics are complete bs. no film could take that

Sorry to bust anyone's bubble but most film will operate at minus 0 temps, secondly the NASA cameras were sealed in an insulated casing (bulky) and were in the heated lunar module moments before, then taken back in. Keep in mind they were'nt outside that long on the first missions.
Also some of the photos were captured by Houston after being relayed via radio.
As for faking it. there were too many eyes on this to try a stunt like that. Ham operators around the world picked up the brodcast beamed back and it wasn't moonbounce!

"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever
remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
-- Sherlock Holmes in The Sign of the Four

#20    tkr9

tkr9

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 57 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2004

Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:38 AM

See! No run of the mill Kodak!

Besides which we went back there squillions of times and faking it again and again and again would just be tiresome.

We are heathens who worship an idol, that we keep for our pleasure and pride, slaves to the saddle and bridle, but kings of the earth when we ride! Ode to Horses.

#21    Universal Absurdity

Universal Absurdity

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,592 posts
  • Joined:12 Sep 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:everywhere

  • You wont win.

Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:39 AM

ok, that was my only argument

film was in a casing that protected it, it operates at low temps, and some of the pics were beamed back by radio. no moonbounce.

see, these are little tidbits i had'nt known. thank you for bringing them into light.
i'll consider that it did happen now.


tkr9, i was referring to the van allen belt's affect on film, not people
Gryphon was kind enough to describe the bulky protective casing for the film. it must have been good enough.

Ű∩ίvệѓα|ΛЬşűяđĬŧỵ

Founder Of The Animated Avatar Workshop
43 things

#22    southampton enigma

southampton enigma

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 119 posts
  • Joined:10 Apr 2004

  • Just because you cannot see it, does not mean it isn't there, even if you can see it who cares, leave it be

Posted 18 May 2004 - 11:10 AM

Hi Gryphon with a government like the U.S.A has got i would not be surprised if everyone in houston was in on this hoax, they kept area 51 at groom lake a secret for years, so why not the moon landing, after reading and researching i have come to notice that the americans have to be the first or best at anything, and just to get one over on everyone they faked the moon landing to gain world recognition as the first country to put man on the moon.


#23    Stellar

Stellar

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,897 posts
  • Joined:27 Apr 2004
  • Gender:Male

  • The objective of war is not to die for your country. It's to make the other son of a b**** die for his!
    -Patton

Posted 18 May 2004 - 11:53 AM

Every country wants to be the best. It doesnt make them inharently evil.

"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent."

----Seraphina

#24    southampton enigma

southampton enigma

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 119 posts
  • Joined:10 Apr 2004

  • Just because you cannot see it, does not mean it isn't there, even if you can see it who cares, leave it be

Posted 18 May 2004 - 09:57 PM

I am not saying that the U.S is evil at all because they are not, but the reading i have done has told me that america has got to be first in everything, it does not mean that they are evil  


#25    PurpleStuart

PurpleStuart

    Goth

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,118 posts
  • Joined:12 Jan 2002
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

  • The Most Purple Haired Gothic Hedonistic member of the Six Worst Men of the Apfelschnaps

Posted 18 May 2004 - 10:11 PM

Not again


Quickly this time - the moon land was categorically not a hoax. There have been many similar threads in this forum dealling with this topic - all the 'pro-hoaxers' questions are answered in them. use this forum's search function and you'll find the threads and associated links there which explain it all.

never take me too seriously

#26    southampton enigma

southampton enigma

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 119 posts
  • Joined:10 Apr 2004

  • Just because you cannot see it, does not mean it isn't there, even if you can see it who cares, leave it be

Posted 18 May 2004 - 10:29 PM

Cheers for that PurpleStuart i will go and take a look mate  thumbsup.gif  


#27    southampton enigma

southampton enigma

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 119 posts
  • Joined:10 Apr 2004

  • Just because you cannot see it, does not mean it isn't there, even if you can see it who cares, leave it be

Posted 18 May 2004 - 11:03 PM

Another question for you lot, In the broadcast of the moon landing who was on the moon already holding the video camera to record neil armstrong coming down the steps of the lunar module?


#28    Magikman

Magikman

    Most Exalted member of the first 15

  • Member
  • 6,280 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

  • "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur"

Posted 18 May 2004 - 11:08 PM

huh.gif

I think you will find that the camera was attached to the lunar module.


*HERE'S a link to the most informative discussion held about the topic. Notice it's been locked due to repetitive questions and lack of any newer arguements that have been put forward. I'll need to be convinced as to why this thread should be allowed to continue.

Edited by Magikman, 18 May 2004 - 11:17 PM.

Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. ~ Carl Sagan

"...man has an irrepressible tendency to read meaning into the buzzing confusion of sights and sounds impinging on his senses; and where no agreed meaning can be found, he will provide it out of his own imagination." ~ Arthur Koestler

#29    southampton enigma

southampton enigma

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 119 posts
  • Joined:10 Apr 2004

  • Just because you cannot see it, does not mean it isn't there, even if you can see it who cares, leave it be

Posted 18 May 2004 - 11:14 PM

Thanks Magikman  thumbsup.gif  but surely if the camera was in a bulky casing as stated on the other page then surely it would have been to heavy for the module? just a thought.


#30    anonymous57

anonymous57

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 179 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2003
  • Location:Area 51

  • Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain

Posted 19 May 2004 - 07:20 PM

A friend of mine said he could prove that they never landed on the moon about 2 years ago. I'm still waiting.


If you read this I now own your soul




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users