I require pictures of the common backdrops to know what your speaking, if it is what I think it is NASA readily admits clerical mis-titling of two frmes taken 3 minutes apart if this is what you are referring to.
that is possible, i havent heard that excuse yet.
i see you have no argument to my main point about the film. true they have some moon rocks, and hey, they may have even went to the moon but those pics are complete bs. no film could take that
"Sanity may be madness but the maddest of all is to see life as it is and not as it should be." (from) Don Quixote
Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:21 AM
Well when it comes to the greatest scientific minds and you saying "no film could take those pics" I'll go with the scientific minds!
What about your evidence..... its complete and utter nonsense. The van Allen belts are regions above the Earth's surface where the Earth's magnetic field has trapped particles of the solar wind. An unprotected man would indeed get a lethal dose of radiation, if he stayed there long enough. Actually, the spaceship traveled through the belts pretty quickly, getting past them in an hour or so. There simply wasn't enough time to get a lethal dose, and, as a matter of fact, the metal hull of the spaceship did indeed block most of the radiation.
As long as men are free to ask what they must, free to say what they think, free to think what they will, freedom can never be lost and science can never regress.
Julius Robert Oppenheimer. (1904-1967)
Try cameras designed to operate in outer space. Y'know, a bit tougher than yer run of the mill kodak disposable. Hubble's never had any trouble either.
Van Allen aside I can see no reasonable argument once you've been through my list that 'we' or rather you, or any Americans here, never landed on the moon. The Chinese are going soon, and are not faking it. Eventually we will all go there again, perhaps even for our hols. Then we can toddle along to the landing sites and find out for ourselves.
Heat up any film to the extremes yes you will damage it, but then you'd damage the astranauts too. They were safe in a pod, with the film, not skimming along the atmosphere on a tea tray.
Dear God I am getting flippant. Two in the morning and I have a job interview at eleven. Must dash.
As for the lunar landing sights, because of the vast distance to the peaks in question, one could circumnavigate the lander, take the same image and the lander, behind you, would not be in shot.
Any more questions before I go to beddybyes?
Edited by tkr9, 18 May 2004 - 02:30 AM.
We are heathens who worship an idol, that we keep for our pleasure and pride, slaves to the saddle and bridle, but kings of the earth when we ride! Ode to Horses.
There are no such things as accidents, only plans that others have made and failed to tell you about!!
Posted 18 May 2004 - 02:30 AM
QUOTE (UniversalAbsurdity @ May 18 2004, 03:12 AM)
but those pics are complete bs. no film could take that
Sorry to bust anyone's bubble but most film will operate at minus 0 temps, secondly the NASA cameras were sealed in an insulated casing (bulky) and were in the heated lunar module moments before, then taken back in. Keep in mind they were'nt outside that long on the first missions. Also some of the photos were captured by Houston after being relayed via radio. As for faking it. there were too many eyes on this to try a stunt like that. Ham operators around the world picked up the brodcast beamed back and it wasn't moonbounce!
"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever
remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
-- Sherlock Holmes in The Sign of the Four
Just because you cannot see it, does not mean it isn't there, even if you can see it who cares, leave it be
Posted 18 May 2004 - 11:10 AM
Hi Gryphon with a government like the U.S.A has got i would not be surprised if everyone in houston was in on this hoax, they kept area 51 at groom lake a secret for years, so why not the moon landing, after reading and researching i have come to notice that the americans have to be the first or best at anything, and just to get one over on everyone they faked the moon landing to gain world recognition as the first country to put man on the moon.
The Most Purple Haired Gothic Hedonistic member of the Six Worst Men of the Apfelschnaps
Posted 18 May 2004 - 10:11 PM
Quickly this time - the moon land was categorically not a hoax. There have been many similar threads in this forum dealling with this topic - all the 'pro-hoaxers' questions are answered in them. use this forum's search function and you'll find the threads and associated links there which explain it all.
I think you will find that the camera was attached to the lunar module.
*HERE'S a link to the most informative discussion held about the topic. Notice it's been locked due to repetitive questions and lack of any newer arguements that have been put forward. I'll need to be convinced as to why this thread should be allowed to continue.
Edited by Magikman, 18 May 2004 - 11:17 PM.
Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. ~ Carl Sagan
"...man has an irrepressible tendency to read meaning into the buzzing confusion of sights and sounds impinging on his senses; and where no agreed meaning can be found, he will provide it out of his own imagination." ~ Arthur Koestler