[digitalartist]

So laserles what ever happened to big jake?

For those confused check out this article http://www.phoenixne...s-of-big-jake/1

[Laser Les]

digitalartist, on 20 October 2009 - 03:31 PM, said:

So laserles what ever happened to big jake?

For those confused check out this article http://www.phoenixne...s-of-big-jake/1

Big Jake was really named for Jacob...son of Isaac...Son of Abraham and his ladder or portal to the heavens.
(that's what the petroglyph was and still is)

Next the stone became the Jesus Petroglyph (because of the kneeling figure and the prominent excise etched fish flowing from his face). The Jesus Petroglyph was on a standing Ebay auction starting @ $2.5M for over a year. The response was overwhelming!

Finally...as of the past 3 years...the stone retains the name The Genesis Petroglyph because it is a video hologram message detailing The Epoch of Gilgamesh. Much from Genesis comes from the stories deciphered from the cuneiform ceramic cylinder seal shards found in such places as Ur, Nippur and the cradle of civilization.

The article was written in the late 90s when this research was less than 2 years in progress.

With the amount of information my perceptions of the artifacts were quite accurate.

The article...no real perceptions by Pete Gilstrap and less than complementary.

Today...those who see this research with my optical translation system...will see photo images, hologram projections and motion video across the surface of these stone artifacts.

[Moonie2012]

Laser Les, on 19 October 2009 - 12:43 AM, said:

Sepulchrave...I would like to thank you for the information...very useful indeed.

Of, course when dealing with ancient images with no visual reference...it becomes difficult!

I attached a profile from The Unicorn Petroglyph. I'm convinced...will get back when I find a decent reference to compare.

laserles

OMG, you actually provided a picture of Ookla from Thundarr the Barbarian as evidence of unicorns? That's awesomely silly. I'm really having trouble believing no one takes you seriously! That's not even a unicorn he's riding.

So where can we see a clip of this "motion video" that is recorded in the stone? You keep saying there's video, so let's see it already.

This post has been edited by Moonie2012: 20 October 2009 - 08:18 PM

[digitalartist]

Laser Les, on 20 October 2009 - 03:55 PM, said:

Big Jake was really named for Jacob...son of Isaac...Son of Abraham and his ladder or portal to the heavens.
(that's what the petroglyph was and still is)

Next the stone became the Jesus Petroglyph (because of the kneeling figure and the prominent excise etched fish flowing from his face). The Jesus Petroglyph was on a standing Ebay auction starting @ $2.5M for over a year. The response was overwhelming!

Finally...as of the past 3 years...the stone retains the name The Genesis Petroglyph because it is a video hologram message detailing The Epoch of Gilgamesh. Much from Genesis comes from the stories deciphered from the cuneiform ceramic cylinder seal shards found in such places as Ur, Nippur and the cradle of civilization.

The article was written in the late 90s when this research was less than 2 years in progress.

With the amount of information my perceptions of the artifacts were quite accurate.

The article...no real perceptions by Pete Gilstrap and less than complementary.

Today...those who see this research with my optical translation system...will see photo images, hologram projections and motion video across the surface of these stone artifacts.

A little confused here:

In the article you said this about Big Jake :

Quote

I played racquetball on the weekends for many years and Big Jake was a guy that used to be there. He no longer shows up so I figured it was okay [to use his name]. He was a big guy, a real friendly guy."

Now you say it was named after Jacob.

and confused here:

Quote

Such as: scenes of ancient Mesopotamia. A profile of Sargon, king of Akkad. The ethological history of bison. The legendary Incan city of Machu Picchu. A paleographical "smiley face." The more you examine Big Jake, the more you will see.

Now you say it's a rendition of the epic of Gilgamesh.

[Laser Les]

[quote name='sepulchrave' date='17 October 2009 - 02:04 PM' timestamp='1255802684' post='3128667']
A bit of Googling brought me to this software: Free 2D Image Correlation Software which might work (I have absolutely no experience with it). Basically I would compare (by computing the correlation factors) images of the petroglyphs with images of faces, boats, etc. and also images of normal stones and random junk. If the petroglyph images have a higher correlation with the faces/boats/unicorns and whatnot than the random pictures then that is a quantitative result.
/quote]

Yes indeed...the Opticist software clearly identifies the unicorn image.

Establishing a reference for the image correlation will be more difficult.

This stone etched projection is the only known photo image of the unicorn.

Specific visual details of the creature standing within this stone etched codex projection are defined in the Book of JOB chapters 39 - 41.

The Chinese QingQilin would correlate better than the unicorn from the tapestries!

laserles
attachment:1

Attached File(s)

•  unicorn-images-1b.jpg (218.38K)
  Number of downloads: 29

[tinieblas]

I'm not saying I believe this as undeniable fact although admit to being intrigued.

However, layperson's question....for the techniques and encoding so described is not a crytalline substance required in order to allow for overlay and 'messages' to be encoded in different wavelengths of light in a manner which would just not work with gold; diamond or minerals perhaps but not gold or any metal in my opinion; prove me wrong by all means but I'll need convincing, not just being told I'm wrong.

I'll keep my mind open on this but I do see images there, not all which the author told me were there (not clearly anyway) but I am intrigued.

[Laser Les]

tinieblas, on 25 October 2009 - 07:11 PM, said:

I'm not saying I believe this as undeniable fact although admit to being intrigued.

However, layperson's question....for the techniques and encoding so described is not a crytalline substance required in order to allow for overlay and 'messages' to be encoded in different wavelengths of light in a manner which would just not work with gold; diamond or minerals perhaps but not gold or any metal in my opinion; prove me wrong by all means but I'll need convincing, not just being told I'm wrong.

If you consider the processing method for an integrated circuit (IC)...we can then begin to understand the complexity of this highly advanced inscription technology.

The process involves developing image masks layers in a photo-resistive material that has been deposited onto the surfaces. With ICs, the substrate surface (i.e. silicon wafer) is flat and smooth. With these stone etched artifacts, the surfaces have been specifically prepared with incisions and excisions that become intricate to the images (see attached example from The Genesis Petroglyph).

Selective spectrum and perspective position enable the pixel masks to project hologram images. Photos of hologram projections capture images in motion. The photos themselves become holographic.

laserles

Attached File(s)

•  pixel-mask-HR-1b.jpg (233.93K)
  Number of downloads: 19

[Laser Les]

Computer correlation and identification of the projected hologram creature in The Unicorn Petroglyph...

PC Pareidolia...or...an advanced stone etched video communication?

laserles

Attached File(s)

•  unicorn-quinqilin-1.jpg (246.81K)
  Number of downloads: 15

[housty]

So.... They found a rock that projects a video?

[digitalartist]

Laser Les, on 25 October 2009 - 10:46 AM, said:

Specific visual details of the creature standing within this stone etched codex projection are defined in the Book of JOB chapters 39 - 41.

The Chinese QingQilin would correlate better than the unicorn from the tapestries!

Job details Behemoth and Leviathan in those passages but I found no reference to anything that could be considered a unicorn.

If you look closely at the image you supplied The Chinese QingQilin actually has 2 horns that point back instead of forwards like your supposed unicorn image.

[Universal Sight]

digitalartist, on 02 November 2009 - 09:40 AM, said:

If you look closely at the image you supplied The Chinese QingQilin actually has 2 horns that point back instead of forwards like your supposed unicorn image.

Looks like a donkey to me. Either they used rock as canvas or there is another planet with donkeys....dunno.

[Laser Les]

digitalartist, on 02 November 2009 - 10:40 AM, said:

Job details Behemoth and Leviathan in those passages but I found no reference to anything that could be considered a unicorn.

Referencing the KJV bible:

JOB chapter 39 verses 9 & 10: Details very special creature...the unicorn, standing upright in a furrow (ditch) with a band around the neck.

JOB chapter 40 describes the same pastoral giant...chapter 15: Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.

In JOB chapter 41...the same creature is now called the leviathan. Hebrew transliteration of the word 'levayan' being swirled. This refers to the swirled horn on the creature's head.

One creature with 3 'pet' names. A creature described to be above all others...The Creator's favorite! A creature described to Job after proving his faith and conviction to God.

The Unicorn Petroglyph is a photographic record of JOB chapters 39 - 41. Stone etched media used to transfer a communication...ultimately, it was incorporated into the bible.

digitalartist, on 02 November 2009 - 10:40 AM, said:

If you look closely at the image you supplied The Chinese QingQilin actually has 2 horns that point back instead of forwards like your supposed unicorn image.

If you see the unicorn in these posted projections from stone...you are seeing the most elusive creature known.

laserles

Attached File(s)

•  5v.jpg (119.19K)
  Number of downloads: 18

[Universal Sight]

Laser Les, on 02 November 2009 - 07:13 PM, said:

If you see the unicorn in these posted projections from stone...you are seeing the most elusive creature known.

laserles

i would have to agree as it is hard to locate actual creatures from the realm of imagination.

Interesting read though.

[Laser Les]

Universal Sight, on 03 November 2009 - 02:03 PM, said:

i would have to agree as it is hard to locate actual creatures from the realm of imagination.

Don't think the oldest story of the bible (JOB) refers to an imaginary creature.

However...The One who inspired religious scriptures from a multitude of faiths has sent a very sophisticated and significant message to humanity...modern humanity...humanity who will witness 2012!

The Genesis Petroglyph
attachment: 1

Attached File(s)

•  genesis-message-2012a.jpg (192.48K)
  Number of downloads: 17

[Universal Sight]

Laser Les, on 04 November 2009 - 06:21 PM, said:

Don't think the oldest story of the bible (JOB) refers to an imaginary creature.

Sorry Les, but, i like to look at things on the science side of things. Just need some actual proof of this creature. Not a similarly looking pattern in a rock.

Quote

However...The One who inspired religious scriptures from a multitude of faiths has sent a very sophisticated and significant message to humanity...modern humanity...humanity who will witness 2012!

So....what comes of this if nothing actually happens in 2012 as you say? Are you going to have to review your studies, techniques or perception of your own ideas and maybe have to apply it to another event that will still make sense of why these "messages" are in rocks?