swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
You may want to do some historical fact checking here - the chaptering of the bible was not the same today as it was at the time of its writing. In fact, the bible has been "rechaptered and versed" many times - 1st around the time of the Council of Nicaea in AD 325, then during the creation of the Latin Vulgate translation of the bible 50 years or so later, then again by Archbishop Stephen Langton in 1227.
Although interesting, none of the history of the evolution of the Bible is relevant. The chapterisation and versification of the NIV Bible as it is today is the rock on which the New Bible Code stands.
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
First off, what is the significance of the number 115?
The important fact is that the number 1265 is divisible by 11. The other divisor, 115, has some interesting gematria attached to it, some of which might be relevant, but this is of secondary importance here. In the NIV, verses thematically related to 9/11 repeatedly turn out to be multiples of 11, a confluence of number and meaning that is statistically improbable and designed to catch our attention and stimulate further investigation.
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
There are an infinite number of numerals that can be evenly divided even by 11 and an infinite number of numerals that can be divided by 11 and leave a remainder. So what?
Yes, if you divide infinity by 11, you still have infinity. Yet there are only a finite quantity of numbers that can be extracted from the Bible, and some of these are more high-profile than others. What I find is that the most significant numbers are usually part of the code, often multiples of 11. For instance...
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
Just as an illustration - there are about 31,173 verses in the NIV - divide that by 11 and you get 2833.9 - so, since the chapter 11 is "significant", what about the verses? See what I'm getting at - out of 2833 verses, I will lay you odds you can find some that also fit into your "theory".
There are precisely 31086 verses in the NIV (16 less than the KJV). 31086 is 11 x 2826.
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
Also, does this work with other translations of the bible, or just the NIV?
As far as I am aware the vehicle for the New Bible Code is the NIV Bible, although, since the code developed over many hundreds of years (at least 1000 years,in fact, possibly longer), other versions of the Bible contain fragments of the code.
For instance, the KJV Bible begins
In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth. And the..
The NIV Bible begins
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. Now the...
The addition of one letter (to 'heaven') in verse 1 and the change from 'and' to 'now' in verse two have the effect of changing the ordinal value of the first 12 words from 463 to 515. This creates the first of the
'Signatures of Christ', thus:
Jesus (s) = 515
which was not present in the KJV. However, the first of three numbers identifying the
Creation Snowflake, 252 is present, because the first six words are the same, and these encode the outer rim of the snowflake. The other two numbers (ov of the first 18 words and ov of verse 2) are unique to the NIV, as far as I can tell.
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
If just the NIV, why is that translation so important? It's one of the most recent translations and was a thought-to-thought translation - a method of translation keeps the menaing intact, but adds a lot of sentence restructuring from the original text. Which means that, though the ideas are accurate, the text is not necessarily in the same structure of the original.
In my opinion, the NIV was probably chosen because
1) it is the most popular moden English translation of the Bible.
2) English is the international language of choice.
3) It was finished only about twenty years before 9/11, which perhaps allowed it to be 'fine tuned' in a way the KJV, for instance, could not have been.
If you were going to place a code in a modern version of the Bible, the English-language NIV is the one you would chose.
The New Bible Code is completely new (as the name implies) and is not related to any other code that may be in the Bible. Many people object to the possibility of a code being in the NIV because they have a prior belief that any code could only have been placed within the original scriptures (which itself should be problematic for them as these were temselves edited many times), or they believe that God would onl have inspiredthe original scriptures. I believe, however, that God inspires us all the time, and has guided the evolution of the Bible and the translation of the NIV (and perhaps the KJV), and the course of world events to send us a powerful message at this critical pass in our march through history.
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
Can you explain to me why E. W. Bullinger assigned the number 11 the meaning of imbalance, etc? In numerology, 11 is a symbol of purity and balance.
In different times and cultures, numbers have meant different things. In the biblical scheme 12 means perfect government (12 disciples/tribes of Israel under The Lord's guidance), so 11, being 1 less than 12, means imperfection. There are several instances in the Bible, of 11 being associated with imperfection, disorder, etc.. In Genesis 11, God punished man for his hubris in building a tower that 'will reach unto heaven' by confusing his languages and 'scattering him across the earth'.
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
How do you come up with the "two witnesses" symbolizing the twin towers? Are you privy to some information that hundreds of years worth of bible experts aren't?
The code uses many different symbols for the twin towers: The tower of Babel, a ram with two long horns (Daniel 8), Goliath, felled by a slingshot from David (1 Sam. 17), the fig tree that Jesus withered (Mark 11), the two criminals crucified alongside Jesus (Luke 23), the feet of the disciples washed by Jesus (John 13), the beast (Rev. 13) the two witnesses (Rev. 11), Babylon (Rev. 17), and many others. All are symbolic of the towers in one way or another, either through what they represent(for instance Goliath represented physical might, Babylon greed, etc), or because there were two of them (the two witnesses, the disciples two feet, etc).
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
All reputable study of Revelation 11 that I can find refer to the "two witnesses" as two prophets, and tie the "two olive trees" to Zechariah 4:2-3, 4:14 - the bible is full of motifs from the old testament that are then used in the new testament. It's common. All references to the "two witnesses" specifically refer to them as people. There is no reason to believe they are symbolic of two towers built 2000 years later.
The bible speaks to us on many levels and passages can be representative of more than one thing. Many areas of biblical study are completely unaffected by the code, although some, most obviously eschatology, certainly are affected. But there are so many schools of thought regarding the end times - milleniumism, amilleniumism, preterism, etc, that most of them have to be wrong anyway!
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
Further more, the "two witnesses" are most commonly believed to be symbolic of prophets from the old testament, most commonly Elijah, Moses, or Enoch.
I would have to disagree. It's possible that there are multiple meanings to some biblical prophecies (and history is fractal, so some patterns repeat over and again), but I think that most Christians simply read the Bible too literally.
swollen_ostrich, on 17 November 2009 - 02:17 PM, said:
The "great city" is Jerusalem. The 3.5 years of ministry for the " two witnesses" corresponds to the "42 months" that Jerusalem is held by the gentiles in this same chapter. Everyone has enemies. What is the significance of 191?
191 is a numerical anagram of 911.
New York represents Jerusalem for the purpose of the drama created on 9/11. Jesus Christ was crucified in Jerusalem around 33 AD. The terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 were a symbolic
crucifixion that marked His Second Coming, 2000 years later.
This post has been edited by blue triangle: 18 November 2009 - 03:37 PM