[TALM]

So in my research I ran across this info about a Harvard proffesor who watched and documented vegative type growth on the Moon. I personally know he was right on target, and his prior research fills in a lot of blanks for me.

He saw it all and documented it's changing growth paterns much to the dismay of the skeptics of the time. I wish I could go back in time and show him actual vivid photographs of it. If you have any interest in ET at all, I highly recommend reading this.

As I said, I personally know he was correct in his observations, but you might be able to link what was discovered by this outstanding renounded astronomer and possible realize that I am right on target with my discoveries also.


I hope this link works. This post really is not about my work, but more or less to highlight his.

http://query.nytimes...9669D946095D6CF

[sinewave]

That is from 1921, for Pete's sake! I'd like to think we've learned a bit since then. You probably could not find anyone at Harvard to agree with him today.

This post has been edited by sinewave: 28 October 2009 - 10:02 PM

[thefinalfrontier]

Hi TALM;

I dont mean to be rude or short but we now know for a fact that there is no vegitation on the moon, They also claimed the same thing on Mars and it turned out to be carbon ice, Sorry but there is no vegitation on the moon, I always try to have an open mind but after thirty years of studying the cosmos this claim is inacurate at best,

[Robbo]

I remember seeing pictures of what someone claimed to be tree tops; either on the moon or Mars (location is irrelevant). However, yes they looked like trees, but when you considered the scale of the photographs; one tree top was about the size of a town. Something like that is going to get noticed beyond conspiracy-level.

[TALM]

Robbo, on 28 October 2009 - 11:34 PM, said:

I remember seeing pictures of what someone claimed to be tree tops; either on the moon or Mars (location is irrelevant). However, yes they looked like trees, but when you considered the scale of the photographs; one tree top was about the size of a town. Something like that is going to get noticed beyond conspiracy-level.

Well, there are no tree's on the Moon I would agree.

[InsideOut]

TALM, on 28 October 2009 - 10:59 PM, said:

Well, there are no tree's on the Moon I would agree.

So would this be the kind of vegetation that is a) curiously invisible, even to the Russian rovers that landed on b ) the conveniently unviewable far side where it c) manages to exist despite intense temperature swings not only d) despite the intense bombardment from cosmic rays and e) has somehow evolved despite the complete and utter battering the far side has taken from impacts?

This post has been edited by InsideOut: 29 October 2009 - 12:51 AM

[Robbo]

There's no trees on Mars either.

[psyche101]

Robbo, on 29 October 2009 - 10:55 AM, said:

There's no trees on Mars either.

Not the first "out there" Idea someone has had, goodness, even today some people think Aliens are here in earth hiding out with kooks from people with intelligence.

Martian Canals.

[Paranormalcy]

Quote

So in my research I ran across this info about a Harvard proffesor who watched and documented vegative type growth on the Moon. I personally know he was right on target, and his prior research fills in a lot of blanks for me.

You know this how? And what blanks did it fill in?

[TALM]

InsideOut, on 29 October 2009 - 01:48 AM, said:

So would this be the kind of vegetation that is a) curiously invisible, even to the Russian rovers that landed on b ) the conveniently unviewable far side where it c) manages to exist despite intense temperature swings not only d) despite the intense bombardment from cosmic rays and e) has somehow evolved despite the complete and utter battering the far side has taken from impacts?

Well, I wasnt there when and if the Russian rovers cruised around, so in all honestly I wouldn't know. The Profesor in the article I posted the link to says he had identified three types of growth, so for all I know, the Russians could have seen any of the three. That is unless they expanded their base of operatios out side a five mile perameter.

As far as the extreme capabilities of the growths ability to thrive I cant really answer the second part of the question.

[TALM]

Paranormalcy, on 29 October 2009 - 09:28 AM, said:

You know this how? And what blanks did it fill in?

The blanks were labeled personal "Validation" due to this outstanding man making the discovey long before I did.

I am sure for most of the readers they have seen nothing to back up his claims and so it is reasonable to assess that he might have been full of crap. But for those who had the slightest interest of long ago scientific discoveries I posted this.

[TRUEYOUTRUEME]

It is interesting to note that we have now been told of hydration cycles on the moon thus filling in one of the blanks as to how it could be possible for growth cycles to take place. Life has been known to survive in extreme conditions here on earth (and able to lie dormant when needed) and of course we still do not know a lot about much of the lunar surface and interior. If there are growth cycles of some form of life on the moon then this possibly is only visible at certain times when the conditions are present but that much of this life is more sustained within the interior of the moon then on the surface.

[Moonie2012]

TALM, on 28 October 2009 - 04:08 PM, said:

I personally know he was right on target

Except he wasn't. It was 1921, for pete's sake. Compared to what we know about the moon now, we knew NOTHING back then.

If you keep going down this ludicrous plants-on-the-moon road you're just going to take another fall, like the several you have taken in the past.

This post has been edited by Moonie2012: 29 October 2009 - 02:23 PM

[Spend]

does it say which crater he was talking about? skimmed the article but didnt see it? was it plato because there was alot of bad data about plato at the time

I think the main issue with this is its pickering, great man discovered pluto and 2 of Saturns satellite (altho number 10 wasn't confirmed for years) but then again he basically invented the planet X theory (which lead to the modern day theories about planets going to hit earth killing everyone rubbish) and stuff like this, there isn't large areas of vegetation on the moon you have to remember this was 1921 everything we had was earth based we've been to the moon now we've had satellite pass it we have had a better chance to look.

[Sweetpumper]

There is no vegetation on the moon.