Consider the following illustration:

Imagine that the black circle represents the circumference perimeter of our universe. The two darker circles ( located at 90 degree and 270 degree) represent "black holes". At these to coordinates Light from outside the universe can enter into our physical/spatial universe. As well Light can traverse the spatial area of the universe and exit through these black holes. The "clumsy" analogy of the balloon does not account for the reality that our universe encompasses invisible space energy as well as geometric form..."mass". Thus our universe is comprised of BOTH space energy and space energy communicated to "mass" visible forms. This being true the circumference of the black circle( relative to the picture) would represent the farthest points ( comprising a circle/sphere)or the "perimeter/demarcation of the universe separating it from what lies outside the universe. Thus the black holes represent "small vestiges" of the CIRCUMFERENCE of the universe that allow light energy to into the universe resulting in the functionality and "being/animation" that occurs within the universe. Light in ...light out! A constant flow of light energy inexhaustible from light energy ORIGIN ( outside our universe)

The thin lined square extroverting the circle was drawn for aesthetic purposes as well to locate the center of the full space/"mass" area of the universe. The center of the circle would represent the intersection point of the 4 diagonal lines through the circle.

The circumference of the circle ( i.e., black circle) represents a solid/liquid ( glasseous= reflective/refractive)perimeter "capturing" such and such amount of invisible space energy light and holding it within the area of the circle( universe). Only at "designated" SPOTS does the circumference of the sphere( area verses "mass") lack ( or is devoid of) the solid/liquid ( glasseous= reflective/refractive)phenomenon. Thus/Or... (ore)... the SPOTS represent "black holes" (openings)found EXCLUSIVELY at the farthest reaches of the universe and demonstratively fall on the circumference of the sphere universe. Black Holes are not dwelling inside the spatial area of the universe( inside the universe) rather exist implicitly ON the circumference of the universe( circumference of the "balloon" relative to the balloon analogy).

To illustrate: If you had a glass ball that had a circumference such and such thick the area in the ball would represent invisible space. If one were to drill holes in the thickness of the circumference of the ball these holes would represent the diametric holes ( black holes such and such diameter)...and would demonstratively "exist" along the circumference thickness of the ball. The holes do not dwell inside the SPACE of the ball...such space is vacuous and could not bear any "holes". However these holes are superiorly relevant to the functionality of all that occurs within the ball. Without these holes no light could enter or exit the ball and all of the principles of life and animation, color, spectrum of color, reflection, refraction ect..would not and could not exist. If a light source was within the "ball" but had no way of exiting all of the processes in the ball would be distorted and not able to function relative to light appropriately and effectively.

Relative too this postulate I add the following:

If one could mathematically deduce( after finding) a black hole at the point 90 degree along the circle( relative to the picture)( sphere as related to the universe)....and then find another black hole at the point marked 270 degree then they would find the distance /linear measurement( two vectors) across the diameter of the universe. The center of this line A-B would be the first coordinate necessary to find the CENTER OF THE SPHERE UNIVERSE (though A to B represents the center of the DIAMETER of the universe up to this point. Thus A-B divided by half represents "a" radius of the diameter of the circle. Thus A-------> center of line A-B= radius.<------------------B center of line=radius. A X B= diameter of circle. Now one must find 2 more black holes located relative to 90 and 270 degree ( black hole(s))at the two other coordinates of 0 or 360 degree and 180 degree. By doing so and intersecting these 4 coordinates( 90;270;0/360;180)then one CAN find the center of the universe. In this postulate lies the reality that anything we see physically with our eyes ( "mass object) or any point that represents space within the sphere universe could fall at the center of the sphere universe. Though it has been proven that the Sun is the center of the SOLAR SYSTEM this does not relegate the potentiality for the EARTH falling at the point representing the center of the UNIVERSE.

If we changed our relative view of the picture illustration what could be true is the next illustration labeled "Earth Jewel". Thus the earth could fall at the center of the sphere universe. However may I draw attention to another strange coloration. we have all heard of the exp

ression that the Earth is like a "Jewel in space". Lets consider the word Jewel backward and do so phonetically. Jewel backward = leweJ. Lets write this out phonetically ( approximately):

EL+E+W+E+JAY

The word "ELE"( first 3 letters in the above word illustration) approximates the Hebrew abbreviated form of the word elohim= ELI ( Aramaic is approximated as well). The next 5 letters form the words and sounds representing when sounded out or stated the word "WEDGE". Thus we see that the idiomatic exp

ression related to the Earth ( that is the exp

ression: "Jewel in Space") accommodates the meaning "ELI WEDGE". Now if you pay close attention to the way I have altered the view of the first picture to a different relative view ( 2ond picture) that the "wedge is formed...the circle representing the universe is formed relative to the wedge( extroverted square outside the circle with the diagonal spans drawn to find the center) and that the EARTH JUST MAY REPRESENT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE CIRCLE /SPHERE. One may find it interesting that the word "wormhole" phonetically ( when considered backward) approximates the exp

ression : "elohim row; where once again elohim appears ( word for "god"= mighty or strong)along with the word ROW. The word row draws into the discussion further postulates.

The universe is NOT expanding! it is reflecting/refracting. Primarily ( as to volume) it is REGFLECTING. Imagine that the circumference of the circle/sphere universe represents a solid/liquid reflective medium. If such were true; anything ( mass relative to space) within the reflective sphere would reflect into the solid/liquid ( glasseous= reflective refractive)circumference perimeter( i.e, reflective medium= grey matter circumference combined with glass thickness...where the grey matter combined with the glasseous solid/liquid comprises the thickness of the circumference of the universe).If this were so and there were 1000 stars , 9 planets and a few "orbiting" satellites then according to the principles behind these postulates they would REFLECT infinitely ( like the rows of reflection produced when holding two mirrors in parallelism to one another or even deviating from parallelism ) back into the thick reflective circumference of the sphere universe. What would occur? THE ILUSSION OF EXPANSION.............where really everything is REFLECTED SPACE LIGHT ENERGY. This could only occur if the circumference had "holes" in it for light to flow in and flow out.

"Black Holes"= holes in the circumference of the universe allowing light energy to enter and exit the universe after producing and resulting in the full functionality of the universe.

The universe is reflecting and not expanding.

If one could find two black holes representing two points exactly opposed to one another on a protractor( for instance a black hole at 0 degree and a black hole at 180 degree relative to the black hole at 0 degree) then measure the distance between these two coordinates one could mathematically deduce the diameter of the universe. repeat this process from "black hole 90 degree" to "black hole 270 degree"..............intersect the points : one could deduce the center of the universe.

I would postulate with the absence of any esoteric predisposition starting with the earth as representing the "center of the universe". Absurd? Have to start somewhere why not at the "ELI WEDGE". ( illus., 3)

Further i would say that the reason why we dont percieve or know what lies in the center of the universe is related to why we dont percieve a certain portion of light image that is communicated to our retina. when our left and right retinas register light there is a small space that is not picked up representing the area between the crosssection of both eyes ( illustration 4 represents this where the blue triangle( pyramid)is the absent space not percieved). Is it any wonder that the word center spells backward ..phonetically...........RETINAS!:

CENTER=RETNEC..............RETNEC= ARE+E+TE+IN+E+CE= "a retina see"!