"How to get rich"

[UM-Bot]

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/images/newsitems/coins.jpg

Phillip Tilley: My good buddy Professor Rocco had a formula for how to become a millionaire. It went like this: first, start with a million dollars, the rest comes easy! My good buddy Tom told me the best way to make a million dollars in the real estate business is to start with two million dollars. I know, that is probably not what you wanted to hear but the truth seldom is.

If you would like to learn the seven major ways to “get rich” read on. But you probably will not like what you read, but it is what it is.

The first way to get rich is very much along the lines of what Professor Rocco said. The first way is to be born rich. If your parents were rich you probably will be too by virtue of inheriting their wealth when they die.

View: Full Article

[maxcred]

The author writes 'For every rich pro athlete, there are ten others just as talented that never got a chance to strut their stuff because they could not afford an agent.' This is a riduculous comment. Athletes who have a chance to turn pro and make a lot of money are courted by agents because of their earning potential. They can become rich and make the agent wealthy in the process. The college football players who will be taken in the upcoming NFL draft have not made any money yet playing football in college (or shouldn't have) but when they sign NFL contacts they will be rich that's when the agents get paid too.

It's also possible to become rich by working when you don't own your own business. If you are fortunate enough to have steady employment and are able to put some money away in smart investments over a long peiod of time that can really ad up. Einstein said compound interest was the world's greatest invention. Being smart with your money may not make you fabulously wealthy but can allow you to live comfortably and have a nice retirement.

[little_dreamer]

How about - eat ramen noodles the rest of your life - and invest the money that you would spend on normal food.

Easier than some of the other methods mentioned.

[lookingfortruth]

That article is rediculous. There are much better ways of getting rich than the ones mentioned here. Do you think the people who are rich just sat on thier butt and did nothing their whole lives? no they got up and took action and thats how they got the money that they have. These people earned it

[A Scanner Darkly]

His numbers are wrong. Per the Consumer Price Index (CPI) $1,000,000 in 1964 has the same buying power has $6,991,645.16 in 2010.

The U.S. stock market is the greatest casino in the world. But you have to be able to afford the buy and the wait. $10,000 of Apple stock purchased @ $22 per share on 12/12/80 (IPO date) would be worth $849,060 (as of 3/30/10).

I don't know where this cheeky author gets his numbers. Most likely shilling for the secret Israel2 omega commu-fascist corporate apparatus which relies on clandestine subterranean lab facilities doing long-term subliminal microwave abductions and the subsequent indoctination.

The only 25-1 economic rational I can think of is buying 30 year U.S. Treasuries at their peak of 12-13% in the early eighties and their value now.

This jokers retroactive economic analysis is flawed.

[Oen Anderson]

His numbers are wrong. Per the Consumer Price Index (CPI) $1,000,000 in 1964 has the same buying power has $6,991,645.16 in 2010.

The U.S. stock market is the greatest casino in the world. But you have to be able to afford the buy and the wait. $10,000 of Apple stock purchased @ $22 per share on 12/12/80 (IPO date) would be worth $849,060 (as of 3/30/10).

I don't know where this cheeky author gets his numbers. Most likely shilling for the secret Israel2 omega commu-fascist corporate apparatus which relies on clandestine subterranean lab facilities doing long-term subliminal microwave abductions and the subsequent indoctination.

The only 25-1 economic rational I can think of is buying 30 year U.S. Treasuries at their peak of 12-13% in the early eighties and their value now.

This jokers retroactive economic analysis is flawed.

Apparently you never read his article, "Recession ends, depression begins" dated 20 February, 2010 on this very web site. Paragraph 7, he mentions "John Williams" who runs a web site(shadowgovernmentstatistics.com). I went there and the first page of the site is on why the CPI, GDP, and unemployment run counter to our personal experience. Based on John Williams stats the author is dead on. It is my opinion the whole point of his articles is to wake people up to reality and not just believe blindly the status quo. That is why he ends his articles with "Wake up people, the money matrix has you." If you're still thinking inside the box the money matrix clearly has you dude.

[A Scanner Darkly]

I couldn't agree more: the mammon matrix has me. What I was criticizing was his financial forensics. I don't know what you think but using the CPI to determine that $1 million in '64 is the same has $7 million now seems pretty damn accurate to me. Unless you couldn't survive on 7 million.

He's what I'd do with $7 million. Purchase a 2-10 unit apartment near the beach with a nice owner-occupied unit in a high employment area for $1.5-2 million. The remaining $5 million I'd take half and buy a successful free-standing restaurant/bar-grill (business and land) and with the other half develop a portfolio of dividend-paying equities, mutual funds, CD's, Treasuries, muni's, etc..

This financial Profile (pro-life) would generate a relatively secure after-tax cash flow approacing $250,000 yearly and with equity growth, through diversification stability and selective high-flyer IPO type investments would keep up with inflation.

The tone of this article is that of subterranean scientists using synthetic telepathy/neuro-impulse weapons to "doom and gloom" an abductee that it's useless, everything is ****. Juxtapositioning an article like this to an abductee and hitting them with "no hope" sub-surface to air-head thought viral missle microwave attacks is very common.

[Oen Anderson]

I couldn't agree more: the mammon matrix has me. What I was criticizing was his financial forensics. I don't know what you think but using the CPI to determine that $1 million in '64 is the same has $7 million now seems pretty damn accurate to me. Unless you couldn't survive on 7 million.

He's what I'd do with $7 million. Purchase a 2-10 unit apartment near the beach with a nice owner-occupied unit in a high employment area for $1.5-2 million. The remaining $5 million I'd take half and buy a successful free-standing restaurant/bar-grill (business and land) and with the other half develop a portfolio of dividend-paying equities, mutual funds, CD's, Treasuries, muni's, etc..

This financial Profile (pro-life) would generate a relatively secure after-tax cash flow approacing $250,000 yearly and with equity growth, through diversification stability and selective high-flyer IPO type investments would keep up with inflation.

The tone of this article is that of subterranean scientists using synthetic telepathy/neuro-impulse weapons to "doom and gloom" an abductee that it's useless, everything is ****. Juxtapositioning an article like this to an abductee and hitting them with "no hope" sub-surface to air-head thought viral missle microwave attacks is very common.

I would agree if the CPI is correct, however strong evidence from the site I referenced earlier suggests it is not correct. It is a lie. So your assumption would be correct if the CPI were correct.

Subterranean scientists not withstanding.

[A Scanner Darkly]

Whether the CPI is entirely accurate isn't that relevant to the average American. Conspiracy theorists, working at the behest of subterranean scientists, will scream that the government "skews" the numbers. And this in and of itself harms confidence.

A 7% variable in the soft science of economics, while significant, isn't a make or break proposition. For example, the average McDonalds franchise grosses $2,311,000 and nets 6-8%. This would mean a range of $138,660 to $184,880 net owner-operator profit. The average would be $161,770. If purchased based on the average owner net and their was a 7% decline in owner net, the profit would still be $150,000. Hardly the poorhouse. A 7% increase in owner net would bring it closer to the higher estimated net ($173,0940).

[Oen Anderson]

Whether the CPI is entirely accurate isn't that relevant to the average American. Conspiracy theorists, working at the behest of subterranean scientists, will scream that the government "skews" the numbers. And this in and of itself harms confidence.

A 7% variable in the soft science of economics, while significant, isn't a make or break proposition. For example, the average McDonalds franchise grosses $2,311,000 and nets 6-8%. This would mean a range of $138,660 to $184,880 net owner-operator profit. The average would be $161,770. If purchased based on the average owner net and their was a 7% decline in owner net, the profit would still be $150,000. Hardly the poorhouse. A 7% increase in owner net would bring it closer to the higher estimated net ($173,0940).

That's only because the average American believes blindly what they are told to believe. The conspiracy theorists working at the behest of subterranean scientists question the things that don't make sense. When they find their own government lies to them it destroys confidence. I'll have to take your word on what a McDonalds grosses, I would have no idea.

[Paracelse]

When humanity was born, all the good fairies gathered at the cradle and offered their best wishes:

Humans will be rich, intelligent and honest.

But the bad fairy that wasn't invited arrived black clad on her broom and claimed:

I cannot undo the works of my sisters but I can change it..... human will never be all three at the same time :devil: if man is rich and intelligent he can't be honest, if he is rich and honest hehehe heheheh :devil:

[A Scanner Darkly]

That's only because the average American believes blindly what they are told to believe. The conspiracy theorists working at the behest of subterranean scientists question the things that don't make sense. When they find their own government lies to them it destroys confidence. I'll have to take your word on what a McDonalds grosses, I would have no idea.

If you had a million dollars to retire on you'd want that CPI in negotiations. For example, I recently found a 1950's duplex in Manhattan Beach, CA that was for sale for $1,499,000. I did over a 1000 appraisals in the South Bay form 11-85 through 12-87 (and dozens in 90266) and I summized that the same property would have sold in 1986 for $265,000. Plug that number into the CPI calculator and you get $524,054.43. Jam that number down the bank's throat and even if you paid a 7% in commissions and closing costs you'd get it for $560,738.24. You'd have a nice 3 bdrm 2 bth unit and a 2/1 rented for $2100. After $600 month for property taxes, insurance and water, sewer, trash you'd net $1500 month and much of it sheltered through depreciation calculations. Not a bad deal, especially when you consider you still have over $400,000 to invest. With a very conservative approach of equities, CD's and treasuries you could generate upwards of a $1000 a month more in cash flow.

Or you can bend over and let the hive dependent commu-fascist corporatists force you to pay double CPI. A 5.9% inflation index would have you paying $1,048,935.82.

[Oen Anderson]

If you had a million dollars to retire on you'd want that CPI in negotiations. For example, I recently found a 1950's duplex in Manhattan Beach, CA that was for sale for $1,499,000. I did over a 1000 appraisals in the South Bay form 11-85 through 12-87 (and dozens in 90266) and I summized that the same property would have sold in 1986 for $265,000. Plug that number into the CPI calculator and you get $524,054.43. Jam that number down the bank's throat and even if you paid a 7% in commissions and closing costs you'd get it for $560,738.24. You'd have a nice 3 bdrm 2 bth unit and a 2/1 rented for $2100. After $600 month for property taxes, insurance and water, sewer, trash you'd net $1500 month and much of it sheltered through depreciation calculations. Not a bad deal, especially when you consider you still have over $400,000 to invest. With a very conservative approach of equities, CD's and treasuries you could generate upwards of a $1000 a month more in cash flow.

Or you can bend over and let the hive dependent commu-fascist corporatists force you to pay double CPI. A 5.9% inflation index would have you paying $1,048,935.82.

All of the millions you are talking about are really not dollars, they are Federal Reserve Notes.

In previous articles Tilley pointed out the difference between money and currency. Federal Reserve Notes are a fiat debt currency and as such when you think you have money you are really holding debt!

Tilleys book clearly proves there is no money, so the "money" you would invest doesn't exist. Look at any paper "money" in your wallet. It says Federal Reserve Note across the top. You can keep your Federal Reserve Notes and all the debt they represent. I want real money.

[Lilly]

I'll be glad to take anyone's *useless* Federal Reserve Notes off their hands.

[SV-001]

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/images/newsitems/coins.jpg

Phillip Tilley: My good buddy Professor Rocco had a formula for how to become a millionaire. It went like this: first, start with a million dollars, the rest comes easy! My good buddy Tom told me the best way to make a million dollars in the real estate business is to start with two million dollars. I know, that is probably not what you wanted to hear but the truth seldom is.

If you would like to learn the seven major ways to “get rich” read on. But you probably will not like what you read, but it is what it is.

The first way to get rich is very much along the lines of what Professor Rocco said. The first way is to be born rich. If your parents were rich you probably will be too by virtue of inheriting their wealth when they die.

View: Full Article

lol nice article.

[J.B.]

His athlete number's wrong, I don't mean a stat, I mean his basic math is wrong. He said 3000 athletes are millionaires, and stated that the odds in the states would be 1 million to one. Wrong. It's a hundred thousand to one. One tenth the odds he was blabbering about. Quite a significant error there, for someone who wrote a book about economics, a field relying on numbers for everything.

Edited April 3, 2010 by J.B.

[Voyager10]

In my opinion, it is a mistake to assume everyone wants to be rich, at the expense of more important things in life at least, regardless of what one sees or hears about the subject. Obviously everyone wants to have the basic necessities but not everyone needs to keep up with the Jones', as they say

[Oen Anderson]

His athlete number's wrong, I don't mean a stat, I mean his basic math is wrong. He said 3000 athletes are millionaires, and stated that the odds in the states would be 1 million to one. Wrong. It's a hundred thousand to one. One tenth the odds he was blabbering about. Quite a significant error there, for someone who wrote a book about economics, a field relying on numbers for everything.

I have noticed significant mistakes in other articles written by this author. It is my opinion that he does them on purpose to see if anyone is paying attention and will question it. One of the ways to wake people from the illusion that everything is as it seems is to train people to pay attention to detail and question something if it seems out of place. Or like Morpheus from the Matrix movie, you find people already doing that and focus their attention on the area of interest, the money matrix in this case. My question to you J.B. is, have you read his book and if so what did you think of it?

[ShaunZero]

That article is rediculous. There are much better ways of getting rich than the ones mentioned here. Do you think the people who are rich just sat on thier butt and did nothing their whole lives? no they got up and took action and thats how they got the money that they have. These people earned it

Actually alot have. Look at all the people born to rich parents. Alot of people get lucky. Some people work their asses off to get rich as well; they're hard working people but never get the money others get by just being born in the right place at the right time and easily land high profile jobs, etc.

[A Scanner Darkly]

I'll be glad to take anyone's *useless* Federal Reserve Notes off their hands.

That's a good one LOL

[J.B.]

I have noticed significant mistakes in other articles written by this author. It is my opinion that he does them on purpose to see if anyone is paying attention and will question it. One of the ways to wake people from the illusion that everything is as it seems is to train people to pay attention to detail and question something if it seems out of place. Or like Morpheus from the Matrix movie, you find people already doing that and focus their attention on the area of interest, the money matrix in this case. My question to you J.B. is, have you read his book and if so what did you think of it?

I have not, but I know there are a lot of minor things you can do to earn a considerable income, if you're on the ball with them. Like proper investments and such. I also know what he was talking about in his early articles on this site, involving the Fed Reserve. JFK was trying to shut them down, and he ended up dead. Not sure if the link is real, but you hear plenty about it, I even had a history teacher who taught these things, and that the Fed Res was pure evil. Of course, he also classified Fox News as News, not Infotainment, so I really can't vouch for his correctness on the matter. Lol. I wikied the Fed Res just to see what they said. I figured there would be no acknowledged real connection to the Rothschilds. . . I didn't expect that the wiki page would have a conspicuous absence of the name even in the Conspiracy section. Guess they wanted to stay completely unconnected, eh? Not even the suggestion of them there.

[jbondo]

What did I glean from this article? That the author may or may not have worked at McDonald's and is now giving advice on how to get rich. I'll stick with getting advice from Warren Buffet or Donald Trump.

[puridalan]

How to get rich..invent something really stupid..people seem to love crap ^^

[acidhead]

Whats the best way to become 'rich'?

-own an investment banking institution.... scam and scheme investors and bet up or down on their stocks.

Its immoral but 100% legal right now... its 21st century style banking in the western world.

Try that in Indonesia or China and they'll ask your rolling head 'why did you do it?'.

In the western world people actually believe that they will receive a huge return on a small wager.

-we've been duped .

Own a bank... rob it and hold the taxpayer responsible.

Just one major tip:

Give a lot of money in the form a campaign donations to Obama™.

[freeman88]

im starting to realize this site is crap, especially with these recurring stories and pointless articles. HOW TO GET RICH? O THATS EASY FIRST YOU JUST HAVE TO HAVE A MILLION LYING AROUND, THEN JUST MULTIPLY

How to get rich..invent something really stupid..people seem to love crap ^^

Edited May 10, 2010 by freeman88