Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

You Really Can Feel a Person's Stare


Rolci

Recommended Posts

You seem to be claiming that because the experiment is flawed? That fact that the experiment could actually work is irrelevant

I'm claiming that because the experiment is flawed, the conclusions drawn from it are meaningless. The experiment performed could never work as it is not being performed properly, simply repeating a flawed experimet will not make it valid. If the experiment were changed then perhaps it could provide some evidence one way or another.

What is relevant is was the paper work done properly. were the experiments preformed based upon proper procedure. Which is why I said You are treating the experiment as a entity separate and distinct to the efficacy of the outcome.

Anything that works should be tested.....which in my experience includes the Paranormal

I agree that these are the relevant things, as without them the results given by the experiment are invalid. In this case the efficacy of the experiment is compromised by the fact that the experiment is flawed.

There is no evidence that the device does work though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm claiming that because the experiment is flawed, the conclusions drawn from it are meaningless. The experiment performed could never work as it is not being performed properly, simply repeating a flawed experimet will not make it valid. If the experiment were changed then perhaps it could provide some evidence one way or another.

I agree that these are the relevant things, as without them the results given by the experiment are invalid. In this case the efficacy of the experiment is compromised by the fact that the experiment is flawed.

There is no evidence that the device does work though...

He won't listen mate, he is simply unwilling to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ohh if looks could kill.....there would be many dead by my eyes's,lol.........no seriously........i grew up with a best friend who's mother did Iridology...........is this meant to along the same lines??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mellow.gif

This thread scares me.

Triad. A faulty experiment produces untrustworthy results. Perhaps you could design a better experiment, so we could get some good data? I'm sure someone somewhere will be willing to investigate this scientifically.

Better yet, maybe you and the rest of the people on this thread could work together to design a scientific experiment that's acceptable to everyone, then propose it to the guy who did the faulty experiment. If he's still into this idea, he might go for it. Heck, there are plenty of people here who would be delighted to explain how this could have been done better, and it can only enhance his credibility.

If we could get some trustworthy data, we could discuss that instead of the validity of the experiment.

Any thoughts? ph34r.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mellow.gif

This thread scares me.

Triad. A faulty experiment produces untrustworthy results. Perhaps you could design a better experiment, so we could get some good data? I'm sure someone somewhere will be willing to investigate this scientifically.

Better yet, maybe you and the rest of the people on this thread could work together to design a scientific experiment that's acceptable to everyone, then propose it to the guy who did the faulty experiment. If he's still into this idea, he might go for it. Heck, there are plenty of people here who would be delighted to explain how this could have been done better, and it can only enhance his credibility.

If we could get some trustworthy data, we could discuss that instead of the validity of the experiment.

Any thoughts? ph34r.gif

The problem is how do you account for a detection method in the back of the head? There simply isn't anything there that could detect brain waves. The most we could come up with here is simply assessing if there are brain waves that come through the eyes. This experiment also doesn't address that either in any valid way, but that at least is conceivable, but not with the equipment being used in this experiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The One Who Is.... That is a point I have alluded to? In relation to the concerns of the skeptics, related to the link and of course, of the valid conclusions, related to the experiences? Of feeling a persons stare to even society in general.

Mattshark and Dougal....Einstein was a patent clerk when he came up with E=MC^2...Why was he chosen for that role?? Could it have been because of his background?? No he did not as a patent clerk evaluate alleged working devices and make a determination as there validity? Who should be responsible for that? I know this invention will probably make it though patent? If nothing comes up, to question it as something that actually works :mellow: . I mean the patent office does not do that right? So who is responsible for that?

As I have explained numerous times presenting that repeating the hypothesis presented in link? In relation to this thread? Can in no way be considered meaningless. From a practical standpoint this is a win, win situation.

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this thread is about *feeling a person staring at you*...then yes!!...i agree........i feel it......weather out and about doing stuff.....or lying with my man.....and knowing he is looking at me.......or feeling the presence of a person you cannot see.........it does happen......i guess it's a sixth sense....that not all feel.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this thread is about *feeling a person staring at you*...then yes!!...i agree........i feel it......weather out and about doing stuff.....or lying with my man.....and knowing he is looking at me.......or feeling the presence of a person you cannot see.........it does happen......i guess it's a sixth sense....that not all feel.....

The thing is this is a very common experience....and so far no one has denied they have ever had it. I mean is it possible that science is out of control and under the influence of centrifugal force? It can only go in one direction? To afraid of tipping over to even turn there heads in a direction that actually is their?

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is this is a very common experience....and so far no one has denied they have ever had it. I mean is it possible that science is out of control and under the influence of centrifugal force? It can only go in one direction? To afraid of tipping over to even turn there heads in a direction that actually is their?

Any thoughts?

who hasn't picked up their phone half a second before it rings, who hasn't known what's about to happen, who hasn't predicted the right score in a football game. Do all of these things mean that we must have precognitive powers, or could they perhaps just be coicidence.

Now, before i leave this thread, as you're either not understanding what i'm saying, or just ignoring it let me repeat. THIS experiment is flawed, hence the conclusions drawn from the results are meaningless. This does not mean the theory is invalid. With no evidence to support the theory however there is no reason to believe that it is correct. If the experiment were altered and performed properly then real results could be gathered that could point one way or another. Before you suggest that I perform this experiment, as I've said, I have neither the time, nor the money to do so, and quite frankly, the topic doesn't interest me enough.

Please try and understand, the experiment carried out, and the results gathered, are meaningless, you cannot base an argument that this phenomenon is true on a poorly designed experiment and some personal experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is how do you account for a detection method in the back of the head? There simply isn't anything there that could detect brain waves.

The hair generates a static electric field, which is disturbed by passing brainwaves. This disturbance causes the hairs to move slightly, which sends a signal to the brain that one is being watched. This is why people who feel they're being stared at on windy days are often wrong. tongue.gif

Nah, I'm kidding. You're right.

The most we could come up with here is simply assessing if there are brain waves that come through the eyes. This experiment also doesn't address that either in any valid way, but that at least is conceivable, but not with the equipment being used in this experiment.

That's what he needs a new experiment for, ay? I'd settle for someone detecting energy coming out of the eyes [besides heat]. If he can demonstrate that, detection methods can be searched for later.

The One Who Is.... That is a point I have alluded to? In relation to the concerns of the skeptics, related to the link and of course, of the valid conclusions, related to the experiences? Of feeling a persons stare to even society in general.

I'm really confused right now. laugh.gif

As I have explained numerous times presenting that repeating the hypothesis presented in link? In relation to this thread? Can in no way be considered meaningless. From a practical standpoint this is a win, win situation.

Of course testing the hypothesis isn't meaningless. Nobody said it was. Only repeating that flawed experiment would be meaningless. Testing the hypothesis with a new experiment [or a series of experiments] would be great, so we could focus on good data instead of bad methods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which was brought up before The One Who Is in relation to your comments on testing the hypothesis.

I think its funny you guys think testing this is funny, Also Albert was really hired at the patent office because of his background.....which suggest reasoning beyond your excuses as to why? Things like this are not tested properly. As far as claims the devise will not work? Well that is exactly what they are, claims.. :yes:

Any thoughts?

Edited by Triad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give up, clearly you just ignore reasoning and try to confuse your opponents into submission, well done, your wilful ignorance has worn me down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I give up, clearly you just ignore reasoning and try to confuse your opponents into submission, well done, your wilful ignorance has worn me down.

There is only so much nonsensical ranting you can cope with isn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is only so much nonsensical ranting you can cope with isn't there.

Agreed especially when it comes from "scientists". :innocent:

Like I said I brought it up as perhaps a project on UM.......Clearly you wanted to take things to another level....During which it was clear that there was an issue about a "Fact"????

It's clear that you guys really do not have a clue. :angry:

I mean the skeptics.....

You are arguing for something that lacks any real substance when it relates to such topics.

Any thoughts?

Edited by Triad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heuristic virus's notwithstanding? A person can really feel the stare of another.

Any thoughts?

PS:Quarantined :yes::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Edited by Triad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Nothing new noted, but something new brought out to the public. Nice! I've been experimenting with this theory for years and have known it to work. If someone p***es me off I just stare at the back of their head when they aren't looking and project a disappointing thought into their head and watch as they struggle to find out why they are thinking the things they are. Cuase they are close minded individuals who have honestly never took the time to now what powers the human mind can really control. I've been practicing everything from remote viewing, telepathy , aura projecting , seeing premonitions, seeing the future, all the way to putting thoughts that i want into people head and watch them act out what i put there! I love being who i am, Just sucks cause i wonder where all the people that are like me, really are! I love putting people in their places for being so naive and ignorant towards the one person they should be looking up to! The world still has very much to learn...I found god, have you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing new noted, but something new brought out to the public. Nice! I've been experimenting with this theory for years and have known it to work. If someone p***es me off I just stare at the back of their head when they aren't looking and project a disappointing thought into their head and watch as they struggle to find out why they are thinking the things they are. Cuase they are close minded individuals who have honestly never took the time to now what powers the human mind can really control. I've been practicing everything from remote viewing, telepathy , aura projecting , seeing premonitions, seeing the future, all the way to putting thoughts that i want into people head and watch them act out what i put there! I love being who i am, Just sucks cause i wonder where all the people that are like me, really are! I love putting people in their places for being so naive and ignorant towards the one person they should be looking up to! The world still has very much to learn...I found god, have you?

Well feel free to prove it.

Out of curiosity, was god behind the fridge? Good place to find things.

Edited by Raptor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool it, Mattshark. You're not helping anyone by being so abrasive. A little civility can go a long way.

Raptor

[Forum Mod Team]

Edited by Raptor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a "witch" friend who could feel when people had their eyes on him. He hated that feeling. Everytime I lay my eyes on him he would yell out "eyes". Most of the time within a 5 seconds. Everytime.

When we were out in public he would sometimes ask me who the F is staring at him. I would look around always to find some guy or girl looking at him. Once we were at a department store and I wanted to shoplift something.(this was back when I was a dunb kid) He told me no cause there are eyes on us. I told him no way cause there was no one around and no camera in sight. Yet behold I got grab on the way out the store.

I do feel thereare some who can sense/feel a person's stare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people 'powers' or not can feel peoples stares, hell FBI and CIA both train security guards to 'stare at the mointor screens' when training them, to get a person to stop doing what they are doing via on the monitor. One ex would be like a mall and getting someone who is about to shoplift not to shoplift by staring at them on the monitor..

So yes it does work

enough said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people 'powers' or not can feel peoples stares, hell FBI and CIA both train security guards to 'stare at the mointor screens' when training them, to get a person to stop doing what they are doing via on the monitor. One ex would be like a mall and getting someone who is about to shoplift not to shoplift by staring at them on the monitor..

So yes it does work

enough said

well, infront of that comprehensive and well reasoned arguement who can still disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes perfect sense to me for reasons I won't specify. Thanks to the OP for posting the info.

sorry mate, but it doesn't make sense at all. It is bad conjecture posed as science and nothing more and doesn't even remotely address the point it is trying to make (using the very bad practice of teleology too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.