I hate to break it to you (actually, I love breaking it to people like you, but I must make a pretense of politeness), but you are making the extraordinary claim. You are the ones that need to provide the conclusive evidence. That is the way it is, be it in a court of law or in science.
Note the trick here is 'conclusive' evidence. Not supposition and cherry-picked 'facts' that back up those suppositions.