Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

9/11 TV fakery - No planes


  • Please log in to reply
431 replies to this topic

#151    StrayCat

StrayCat

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 20 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2009

Posted 15 May 2010 - 07:42 PM

View PostMID, on 14 May 2010 - 09:47 PM, said:

Oh no, I didn't forget about that.
No one's actually ever known that, nor can prove it.
In fact, that's a CT first, as far as I know.

Well thats just ignorance on your part. HERE is a link to mainstream news covering the fact that some of these so-called hijackers are indeed alive. That alone proves that the official story is a lie.


View PostMID, on 14 May 2010 - 09:47 PM, said:


How about the fact that we don't "defend" against hijacked airplanes?  Know anything about this matter?

LOL. Thats news to me. Maybe you should read about Payne Stewart. A well known golfer who's small Learjet lost contact with air traffic controllers and began to steer off course. Within 15 minutes they had fighters flying alongside the plane. Saying we don't "defend" against hijacked airplanes is just ridiculous on so many levels. We defend against any threat in our airspace.




View PostMID, on 14 May 2010 - 09:47 PM, said:

You are either deliberately being ridiculous, or you have a problem.
The longest flight airborne that day stayed in that condition for 1 hour 21 minutes (AA93). Just over an hour for the last one.  The rest were airborn for even shorter times.

Hours?

We're you around on that day?

I didn't mean any individual aircraft was hijacked for 2 hours. Collectively, there were hijacked airplanes in our skies for approx. 2 hours without getting intercepted by fighters.






View PostMID, on 14 May 2010 - 09:47 PM, said:


The imagination goes a long way toward creating mythology...

Yeah, a hijacked airplane flying into our nations capital and hitting our military headquarters after 2 hijacked airplanes already hit the WTC was just my imagination. All the NORAD drills that have been admitted and confirmed beyond any doubt are just my imagination. Building 7 collapsing in a controlled demolition was just our imagination. Nobody really saw that. The video doesn't exist. The confirmed insider trading of airline stocks was just our imagination.

Must be nice living in your own little fantasy world, eh?




View PostMID, on 14 May 2010 - 09:47 PM, said:

There is more than enough there to feed a rabid imagination, yes...

Theres more than enough there to disprove the official version of events, and that is not debatable- many of the supposed hijackers are alive. And there is more than enough there to suggest that there was government foreknowledge and involvement.


#152    frenat

frenat

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,827 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Wayne, IN

Posted 15 May 2010 - 08:18 PM

View PostStrayCat, on 15 May 2010 - 07:42 PM, said:

Well thats just ignorance on your part. HERE is a link to mainstream news covering the fact that some of these so-called hijackers are indeed alive. That alone proves that the official story is a lie.
Look at the date of that story.  Can you find ANYTHING after the 27th of September when the FBI released the final list?
http://www.911myths....till_alive.html
Why would Saudi Arabia admit months later that 15 of the hijackers wer Saudi citizens if there were any truth that they were still alive?
http://www.usatoday....02/06/saudi.htm

View PostStrayCat, on 15 May 2010 - 07:42 PM, said:

LOL. Thats news to me. Maybe you should read about Payne Stewart. A well known golfer who's small Learjet lost contact with air traffic controllers and began to steer off course. Within 15 minutes they had fighters flying alongside the plane. Saying we don't "defend" against hijacked airplanes is just ridiculous on so many levels. We defend against any threat in our airspace.

Maybe YOU should read about Payne Stewart.  His plane was out of contact over an hour and 15 minutes before being intercepted and then with jets that were airborne for training, unarmed, and not dedicated to air defense.  The confusion in total time came from the change from EDT (Eastern Daylight Time) to CDT (Central Daylight Time) in the NTSB report when the plane crossed the time zone boundary.  Don't believe me?  See for yourself straight from the NTSB.
http://www.ntsb.gov/...A00MA005&akey=1
It if funny that some people are still trying to push the 15 minute intercept time for Payne Stewart after so many years of being proven wrong.  Especially considering it took longer than 15 minutes before NORAD was even notified.  You'd want us to believe they intercepted the jet before they were even told about it.
More here
http://www.911myths....ne_stewart.html


At that time, hijackings usually involved requests for money and/or attempts to divert the plane to a location where the hijackers could get away.  They did not deliberately try to crash the plane to cause mass casualties.  So no, we did NOT defend against hijacked planes.  They were not considered a threat.  They are now.  Before 911, NORAD did not look at the interior of the CONUS (continental US).  Their radars looked outward for an incoming threat, ie. Russia.

Edited by frenat, 15 May 2010 - 08:19 PM.

-Reality is not determined by your lack of comprehension.
-Never let facts stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
-If I wanted to pay for commercials I couldn't skip I'd sign up for Hulu Plus.
-There are no bad ideas, just great ideas that go horribly wrong.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law

#153    Czero 101

Czero 101

    Earthshattering Kaboom

  • Member
  • 5,008 posts
  • Joined:24 Dec 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver, BC

  • We are all made of thermonuclear waste material

Posted 15 May 2010 - 08:30 PM

View PostStrayCat, on 15 May 2010 - 07:42 PM, said:

Well thats just ignorance on your part. HERE is a link to mainstream news covering the fact that some of these so-called hijackers are indeed alive. That alone proves that the official story is a lie.


Perhaps you missed the update to this 9 year old article that the BBC posted in 2006 HERE:

Quote

A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.

The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy.

We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report.

We’ve carried the full report, executive summary and main findings and, as part of the recent fifth anniversary coverage, a detailed guide to what’s known about what happened on the day. But conspiracy theories have persisted. The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names.

In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time.

We recently asked the FBI for a statement, and this is, as things stand, the closest thing we have to a definitive view: The FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Also, the 9/11 investigation was thoroughly reviewed by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and the House and Senate Joint Inquiry. Neither of these reviews ever raised the issue of doubt about the identity of the nineteen hijackers.
Bolding mine...

By your logic, based on the fact that the names of the hijackers were common names, this Facebook page proves that the serial killer Ted Bundy is still alive and well... and apparently a rap singer

http://www.facebook....ang/55613408357

:rolleyes:


EDITED to add...
By the way... the link to the 2006 udate is listed at the bottom of your 2001 article. Perhaps in the future you should pay more attention...



Cz

Edited by Czero 101, 15 May 2010 - 08:31 PM.

"Thinking is critical, because sense is not common..." - GreaterSapien
"Enquiring and doubting the "official story" are also good things .... However when these doubts require you to ignore the evidence, to dishonestly cherry pick evidence and claim it supports your case when it doesn't, when you operate a double standard; demanding proof of that which is already proven whilst making unsupported statements and personal opinions to back your own case and when you deny the truth simply because it IS the official story then you are no longer acting in a rational way. This is not the behaviour of a "different thinker", this is the behaviour of a "believer" who chooses not to rationally think about the evidence at all." - Waspie Dwarf

#154    Obviousman

Obviousman

    Spaced out and plane crazy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,534 posts
  • Joined:27 Dec 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Coast, NSW, Australia

  • "Truth needs no defence. Nobody - NOBODY - can ever take the footsteps I made on the surface of the Moon away from me."
    Gene Cernan, Apollo 17

Posted 15 May 2010 - 08:59 PM

Yep. Apparently I am also a basketball star, a Lieutenant Colonel with an impressive record with the US Army, an account manager, a publisher, a teacher and lots more... and none of them is me.

I'm surprised that so many years after so much of 9-11 myths have been put to bed, there are still people who just lap them up without checking the facts.


#155    Rhomphaia

Rhomphaia

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,384 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland OR

  • Conspiracy Theories: The art of adding 2+2 and getting a result of 22.

Posted 15 May 2010 - 09:46 PM

View PostObviousman, on 15 May 2010 - 08:59 PM, said:

Yep. Apparently I am also a basketball star, a Lieutenant Colonel with an impressive record with the US Army, an account manager, a publisher, a teacher and lots more... and none of them is me.

I'm surprised that so many years after so much of 9-11 myths have been put to bed, there are still people who just lap them up without checking the facts.
And I am a renowned pianist/organist/conductor, a PhD and, unfortunately, a porn star. lol

"We are not here to bend aught...We are come to cleanse."
-Brother Grissom.

#156    Obviousman

Obviousman

    Spaced out and plane crazy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,534 posts
  • Joined:27 Dec 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Coast, NSW, Australia

  • "Truth needs no defence. Nobody - NOBODY - can ever take the footsteps I made on the surface of the Moon away from me."
    Gene Cernan, Apollo 17

Posted 15 May 2010 - 10:21 PM

A porn star? Wow! What's it like?  :D


#157    MID

MID

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,490 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • ...The greatest error is not to have tried and failed, but that in trying, we did not give it our best effort.

Posted 15 May 2010 - 10:25 PM

View PostStrayCat, on 15 May 2010 - 07:42 PM, said:

Well thats just ignorance on your part. HERE is a link to mainstream news covering the fact that some of these so-called hijackers are indeed alive. That alone proves that the official story is a lie.

It's not proof (you have the same problem many CTs have with that word), and it doesn't indicate these people are alive.
Quite the contrary.  These confusions have been long-ago resolved.


Quote

LOL. Thats news to me. Maybe you should read about Payne Stewart. A well known golfer who's small Learjet lost contact with air traffic controllers and began to steer off course. Within 15 minutes they had fighters flying alongside the plane. Saying we don't "defend" against hijacked airplanes is just ridiculous on so many levels. We defend against any threat in our airspace.

I don't think you understand.
Hijacked airplanes are not a threat...at least they weren't prior to 9-11. They are a concern.  There's no attack implied in a hijacking--at least there wasn't prior to 9-11...
Payne Stewart's jet was also not approached as a threat.  It was approached as a concern.
It was approached by the people who do such things so as to be investigated, and guided to safety, or pursueded to follow if possible.
In that case, it wasn't possible.  In the case of 9-11, jets were scrambled, but there was no "defense" involved.
You speak of defense as if it's a matter of shooting something down.  

If you fly into a restricted airspace, you'll find yourself accompanied by an F-18.  It's not there to shoot you down.  It's there to tell you to follow it...and you will (I guarantee it).

What, did you expect U.S. military defensive attack against hijacked airliners on 9-11?

Further, you expected that within an hour we'd have had fighters dispatched to four aberrant aircraft...when no one knew what was going on?

How naive are you?






Quote

I didn't mean any individual aircraft was hijacked for 2 hours. Collectively, there were hijacked airplanes in our skies for approx. 2 hours without getting intercepted by fighters.

There were four jets.  None of them were airborne for "hours", as you said.   As indicated, all of them went airborne within roughly a half hour/ 45 minutes of each other more or less...


At approximately 08:25 that day, it was thought that AA11 was hijacked.
At 08:55, controllers thought they had two hijacked aircraft, which was an incredulous notion in and of itself.  Within minutes, both aircraft impacted the twin towers.

How much response to an heretofore unheard of scenario did you expect???

It was 09:10 or so before AA77 was determined to have been hijacked from other controllers (after other aircraft had already impacted in NYC, which had people's attention ever-so-slightly), and it was roughly 20 minutes later when UA93 was shown to be hijacked.


The only aircraft they really had a chance to dispatch to is UA 93...and that would've been a chore to get out there before they crashed, since it was a known hijacking for about a half hour.

It was an hour and a half between the first hijacking and the final crash.  There was virtually no time to even understand what was going on let alone do something about it...and:

What would they have done about it?   Fly along side...try to coax the airplane into following them...shoot a passenger aircraft down...maybe 93, if they could've gotten there, and had it approved once they confirmed the situation and the intent of the hijackers???

Shoot down 11, 175, or 77?   Where...over populated areas?

As I asked...were you even around for 9-11?  Have you thought about the actual situation presented at all?

Quote

Must be nice living in your own little fantasy world, eh?

The world of rationality and critical thinking is comfortable, at least sometimes.

I cannot imagine it's too nice to live in your fantasy world.


Quote

Theres more than enough there to disprove the official version of events, and that is not debatable


What's not debatable is the fact that you have no idea what constitutes proof...

Quote

- many of the supposed hijackers are alive.

No, they are not.
You've made a fool of yourself there.

Quote

And there is more than enough there to suggest that there was government foreknowledge and involvement.

As I said, it cannot possibly be comfortable living in your fantasy world.
There is nothing to even suggest government foreknowledge and involvement.
That's the most ludrous idea that's been put forth about the events of 9-11.

Somehow, I suspect you won't be swayed from your illusions about this matter.
You're far too sure of your fantasies to actually learn something...


#158    rashore

rashore

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,147 posts
  • Joined:26 Feb 2010
  • Gender:Female

Posted 16 May 2010 - 02:33 AM

View PostStrayCat, on 14 May 2010 - 09:03 PM, said:

Don't get me started. How about at least 5 of the supposed hijackers on 9/11 are still alive, living in the middle east? Oh did you forget about that? How about the best air defense in the WORLD completely helpless against some hijacked commercial airplanes? They were in the air for HOURS while it was known they were hijacked, and still managed to fly right into Washington D.C. and hit the Pentagon. THE PENTAGON. Yeah, nothing out of the ordinary there. Oh but wait, the official excuse for that is...NORAD was running drills of hijacked airplanes crashing into the WTC and Pentagon on the morning of 9/11, at the exact same time of the real attacks. Thats why no jets were scrambled, they thought it was a drill! Nothing suspicious about that. Just a mere coincidence. Then we can get into building 7, which collapsed like a perfectly controlled demolition at freefall speed. What another huge coincidence. And then you have one of the biggest pieces of evidence no one ever talks about- leading up to 9/11 there were RECORD amounts of insider trading of stalks of the airline companies involved in the attacks. Hmmmmmm

Like I said, there is more than enough there. Trying to argue that there isn't just makes you look like a sheep.

What is all this talk of hijacked planes you are talking about? Did you miss the OP, no planes were used :)


#159    Q24

Q24

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,921 posts
  • Joined:12 Oct 2006

Posted 16 May 2010 - 11:48 AM

There are two extremes going on here:  StrayCat, who for the moment appears to have accepted everything from the conspiracy side, and MID, who I know rejects everything that does not sit quite right with the official story.

I would say that the former approach is slightly better as it at least shows an open mind.  The latter has put up defences which mean they cannot learn or adapt no matter what information is shown or how many times it is presented.

Example: -

View PostMID, on 15 May 2010 - 10:25 PM, said:

There is nothing to even suggest government foreknowledge and involvement.
That's the most ludrous idea that's been put forth about the events of 9-11.
MID, some of the hijackers who were known Al Qaeda affiliates were being tracked by the CIA and were allowed to enter the United States.  Once the hijackers arrived in the United States they had numerous contacts with an active FBI informant.  Some of the other hijackers chose to live in a motel right outside the gates of the NSA.

MID, the hijackers were funded by intelligence services (Pakistan’s ISI who the CIA had worked with during Operation Cyclone) and other intellignece agents were arrested on the scene in New York on 9/11 (Israel’s Mossad who have false flag operations on record).

MID, all intelligence warings internal and external to the United States, including those semi-specific threats the President was aware of, were ignored.  Related investigations were blocked even though sections of the FBI knew of the danger.  The FBI have since admitted they have no evidence to lay the blame on bin Laden that could form a legal case.

Source links for this information are all here… if you are serious about the subject.

I’m sure there can be a number of different interpretations of the above information, but to conclude, “There is nothing to even suggest governement foreknowledge and involvement” really just makes you look foolish at best, ignorant at worst.

Note:  before anyone chimes in – I reject all ‘no plane’ nonesense (based on researching the subject with an open mind).

Operation Northwoods was a 1962 plan by the US Department of Defense to cause acts of violence, blamed on Cuba, in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government. The plan called for various false flag actions, such as staged terrorist attacks and plane hijackings, on U.S. and Cuban soil.

#160    Blacksabbath

Blacksabbath

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,081 posts
  • Joined:05 Oct 2006
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:21 PM

So were all the thousands of people who ACTUALLY SAW them planes hitting the towers, actors?


#161    Torgo

Torgo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,239 posts
  • Joined:26 Oct 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Graduate School

  • I aM tOrGo... I tAkE cArE oF tHe PlAcE wHiLe ThE mAsTeR iS aWaY...

Posted 16 May 2010 - 10:06 PM

View PostBlacksabbath, on 16 May 2010 - 05:21 PM, said:

So were all the thousands of people who ACTUALLY SAW them planes hitting the towers, actors?

No - aliens!  Duh  :alien:


#162    MID

MID

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,490 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • ...The greatest error is not to have tried and failed, but that in trying, we did not give it our best effort.

Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:39 PM

View PostQ24, on 16 May 2010 - 11:48 AM, said:


MID, some of the hijackers who were known Al Qaeda affiliates were being tracked by the CIA and were allowed to enter the United States.  Once the hijackers arrived in the United States they had numerous contacts with an active FBI informant.  Some of the other hijackers chose to live in a motel right outside the gates of the NSA.

MID, the hijackers were funded by intelligence services (Pakistan’s ISI who the CIA had worked with during Operation Cyclone) and other intellignece agents were arrested on the scene in New York on 9/11 (Israel’s Mossad who have false flag operations on record).

MID, all intelligence warings internal and external to the United States, including those semi-specific threats the President was aware of, were ignored.  Related investigations were blocked even though sections of the FBI knew of the danger.  The FBI have since admitted they have no evidence to lay the blame on bin Laden that could form a legal case.

Source links for this information are all here… if you are serious about the subject.

I’m sure there can be a number of different interpretations of the above information, but to conclude, “There is nothing to even suggest governement foreknowledge and involvement” really just makes you look foolish at best, ignorant at worst.



Your passion is noteworthy.
You're mis-interpretation of what I said, and the intent of the comment in the post I addressed is typical.

We are all, or at least should be aware that the terrorist attacks of 11 Spetember 2001 were, in part, the result of excessive compartmentalization in government, which resulted in one hand not knowing what the other was doing; one agency either not having the information another had, for whatever reason, thus resulting in less brain-power on the threat assessment than should've been available; and certainly some inaction, as well as some ineptitude...

In other words, rather unfortunate and woefully typical large government conduct which had been going on for years and years prior to the events.

One could make a case for "government knowledge" of the nature of what was going to happen on 9-11-01, but it would be a weak case at best, since all of applicable government either did not know of it, or only had a partial understandings of the implications of threat assessments.

But there is nothing to indicate "involvement" by the government in anything but ineptitude and malfeasance.

Did they screw up?
Yes.
Should they have prevented it?
Yes.

That's a given anymore.
But...



What's being implied here is involvement, in the typical CT sense that the Government (i.e. Bush and his cronies) intended and planned, or participated in a plan to not only violate their Constitutional duties and commit the executable crime of treason against the United States, but to do so by murdering thousands of defensely Americans...those whom they are sworn to protect!

We're talking criminal intent.

That...is idiocy.
That...is what I'm addressing. If you can't see that, it makes you look foolish at best, and ignorant at worst.


#163    Emma_Acid

Emma_Acid

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,308 posts
  • Joined:29 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

  • Godspeed MID

Posted 20 May 2010 - 07:50 AM

View PostStrayCat, on 15 May 2010 - 07:42 PM, said:

Well thats just ignorance on your part. HERE is a link to mainstream news covering the fact that some of these so-called hijackers are indeed alive. That alone proves that the official story is a lie.

So you'll believe mainstream news when it tells you the stories you want to hear? What about the countless stories recounting the official version?

Spot the logical fallacy people.

"Science is the least subjective form of deduction" ~ A. Mulder

#164    thefinalfrontier

thefinalfrontier

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,586 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina

  • When a chicken hawk is around a wise rooster will not bury its head~ ~ ~ ~ Barney Fife~ ~ ~

Posted 20 May 2010 - 08:57 AM

View PostEmma_Acid, on 20 May 2010 - 07:50 AM, said:

So you'll believe mainstream news when it tells you the stories you want to hear? What about the countless stories recounting the official version?

Spot the logical fallacy people.


Emma. MID. and Frenat heres to you all and not to forget Torgo and everyone with asane mind,

I honestly dont have any clue why this threadv has laseted this long, is our world full of CT imbasols?


#165    Sleestak Lightning!

Sleestak Lightning!

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 113 posts
  • Joined:16 Jul 2009

Posted 20 May 2010 - 04:08 PM

It takes *Snip* to claim that 9/11 was faked.

Edited by SupeRgirl, 20 May 2010 - 10:18 PM.
inappropriate comment removed

Has your child completed his or her suspicious activity booklet? Don’t let this summer go to waste.
The enemy is preparing their children are you? Time to show them who’s boss.
Moloch demands fresh blood to maintain the appetite of his mechanical heart.
Will you sacrifice your first born like Abraham would his Isaac?
Will you sacrifice your first born like Abraham would his Isaac?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users