431 replies to this topic

[frenat]

Hocus, on 14 April 2010 - 08:08 PM, said:

You really need to stop being so gullible. It's all well and good saying this and that was recovered, but there only words. Let's see some evidence. And the FBI could simply release the tapes..but they don't. Why not? If what they claim is on them, acutally is, then it would shut people like me up

So now you can add United Airlines in on the coverup.  How many hundreds are in on it now for your "theory"?

The FBI HAS released some tapes.  Not much was on them.  You expect us to believe that a video showing a plane at the Pentagon would "shut you up" when this whole thread is about supposed fakery of video images?  Are you going to sell us a bridge next?

Hocus, on 14 April 2010 - 08:17 PM, said:

So did I.

It still doesn't make it possible for a lightweight jet aircraft to penetrate and slice through steel gurders.

Why not?  Say exactly why it can't.  Do you know anything about momentum?

[frenat]

Hocus, on 14 April 2010 - 07:33 PM, said:

So they say engines were discovered. So what? Engines can be planted too. Engines(allegedly)and few tiny scraps don't prove that planes hit any of the 4 sites they claim they did. What about Pennsylvania? Just a small hole in thr ground with no plane to be seen.

The military can eaisly dispose of 4 planes and all it's passengers, to suggest otherwise and that such a thing is impossible, is simply not true.

Sure just add a few hundred more people they have to keep quiet that won't question the mass murder of hundreds of people.     Where are you going to find people to do that?  Not in the military I can assure you of that.  Of course you didn't actually address the issue.  If the plan calls for 4 planes and 4 planes worth of people and at least three crash in heavily populated areas where somebody might have a camera, what kind of moron thinks it would better to not use a plane at all?  How does that make any sense?

[TK0001]

It's funny to watch frenat make his way through the thread.

He's gone, frenat. We're just standing around smoking and joking at this point.

[frenat]

TK0001, on 14 April 2010 - 09:47 PM, said:

It's funny to watch frenat make his way through the thread.

He's gone, frenat. We're just standing around smoking and joking at this point.

Oh well.  Perhaps he'll be back.  I doubt he'll ever actually address the issues raised though.

[Corp]

Hocus, on 14 April 2010 - 07:09 PM, said:

At all 4 incident sites there is absolutely no evidence of a plane.

Alien Being, on 14 April 2010 - 08:09 PM, said:

I quite cleary saw the second plane hit with my own two eyes. Explain that away.

Hocus, on 14 April 2010 - 08:17 PM, said:

So did I.

This amused me. Seems Hocus is a government plant trying to shut Hocus up

[WoIverine]

Hocus, on 14 April 2010 - 07:09 PM, said:

At all 4 incident sites there is absolutely no evidence of a plane. None, apart from a few small scraps of metal, easily plantable by hand or truck. If a plane hit the pentagon, why not release tapes of it? There are many which would have recorded the event, but instead they were all confiscated and have not been released because the footage will show no plane.

No plane witness -

Another no plane witness (pilot) -

Probably because they want the planes to take the blame for the controlled demolition of the buildings?

Edited by SpiderCyde, 15 April 2010 - 04:21 PM.

[Alien Being]

Corp, on 15 April 2010 - 04:17 PM, said:

This amused me. Seems Hocus is a government plant trying to shut Hocus up

Lol it does appear that way.

The Twin Towers has about 2 million witnesses at the minimum most of who saw the second collision but a few saw the first too.

Now thats a lot of secret Government Agents trying to spread mis-information to make way for the New World Order. Does New York City have several million Illuminati members or do we have posters here blinding themselves to the truth?

Edited by Alien Being, 15 April 2010 - 04:25 PM.

[Belial]

Maybe he as a point though guys...

[TK0001]

SpiderCyde, on 15 April 2010 - 04:20 PM, said:

Probably because they want the planes to take the blame for the controlled demolition of the buildings?

Well that's just silly.

[zenfahr]

Consipracies aside... there is something fishy about the whole ordeal.... and yeah I saw the plane hit as well, but the explosions in the basement, the propranda against the middle east, and the fact that the steel beams melted and the building fell straight down, does make one wonder.

[Alien Being]

zenfahr, on 15 April 2010 - 06:30 PM, said:

Consipracies aside... there is something fishy about the whole ordeal.... and yeah I saw the plane hit as well, but the explosions in the basement, the propranda against the middle east, and the fact that the steel beams melted and the building fell straight down, does make one wonder.

Are you suggesting the Americans knew about the planend attack and decided to make sure the terrorists were successful?

[TK0001]

zenfahr, on 15 April 2010 - 06:30 PM, said:

Consipracies aside... there is something fishy about the whole ordeal.... and yeah I saw the plane hit as well, but the explosions in the basement, the propranda against the middle east, and the fact that the steel beams melted and the building fell straight down, does make one wonder.

All of this can be explained with very logical conclusions that don't point to impossibly massive conspiracies, if you care to look.

[puridalan]

This just drives me crazy, how can you insist on no planes. I know people that were THERE in person, and saw the planes actually crash INTO the building, hell there might of been bombs underneath..who knows, but the planes were there that is a fact that cannot be changed. It's almost scary that some peopole don't even believe in 911 happening, because it's like some children in school now being taught that the holocaust never happened.


I mean not everything is true, but disreguarding HUGE whole things like this..is quiet frankly absurd and highly hurtful to people who went through this ordeal and told them as if, "o you never really expierenced all this trauma its just in your head" same with telling a holocaust survivor..those five years..you weren't really being beaten or starved to death you were just imagining things.

It's like really? really? -.- I think not

[Belial]

I wonder just how many of these 'truth seekers' really give a **** about all the poor passengers and innocent workers who lost there lives that day?

[puridalan]

I am about truth, but that sure as hell isn't going for me to say that 911 never happened, because I do not think that a random family friend who died on 911, can be thought to never have existed..ya I find that highly insulting as well. (growls)

Was going to his grave fake too?!

Edited by puridalan, 15 April 2010 - 07:12 PM.