Jump to content

Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.

- - - - -

US allowed drilling without required permits

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 43,326 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Sometimes it's better to keep the mystery unexplained.

Posted 14 May 2010 - 03:25 PM

www.telegraph.co.uk said:

A troubled US government agency tasked with managing oil exploration allowed BP and other oil companies to drill in the Gulf of Mexico without first obtaining required permits, a complaint said.

The approvals by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) included greenlighting the well drilled by the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig that exploded on April 20, killing 11 workers before burning, sinking and spewing a sea of crude into the gulf, The New York Times reported, citing federal records.

Under the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the minerals agency is required to obtain permits before allowing drilling to go ahead in areas where the oil exploration could harm endangered species or marine mammals.

Posted Image

Posted Image

#2    Astute One

Astute One

    Conspiracy Theorist

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 892 posts
  • Joined:15 Jan 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 May 2010 - 08:45 PM

It is my understanding that the Environmental Impact Statement process was used for the area of the blowout.  The MMS issued a FONSI as it pertains to marine life in the GOM.  There is no sense doing an EIS over and over in the GOM, the results would be the same.  So, the MMS issued the FONSI.  

The oil companies perform bathymetry studies but they frown upon doing baseline environmental surveys.  They can't be held liable if no one knows what environmental concerns are there on the bottom already.  This may change now because BP has no way of knowing what environmental damage was caused by this spill or what is naturally occuring because they do not have baseline data.  oops.  Bad call, but not illegal.

Edited by Astute One, 14 May 2010 - 08:45 PM.

#3    Siara


    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,427 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2006
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Maryland, USA

Posted 14 May 2010 - 09:35 PM

I hope this gets probed in detail.

Today Obama said that he was ending "the cozy relationship between the oil companies and government regulators". A bit late to be saying that isn't it?

They should get going with the investigation NOW.  They've probably been shredding documents in D.C. for the past three weeks.

Edited by Siara, 14 May 2010 - 09:37 PM.

#4    KennyB


    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,472 posts
  • Joined:16 Oct 2005

Posted 15 May 2010 - 05:56 PM

Naturally, I don't know the details or the politics of this increased drilling for oil in sensitive areas. I do, however, think that people are going to have to decide which they'd rather have, a high standard of living or a pristene environment. Sad to say, I think the oil will be the last to go. People love their cars more than they do the beaches and polar bears. KennyB

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users