Abramelin, on 03 January 2012 - 01:52 PM, said:
It all depends on who wrote the OLB and when.
Someone from the 19th century had quite different ideas about astrology and comets than someone from say 2000 years ago.
If you read what a Halley assumed would happen if a comet (the one that bears his name) could cause or could have caused. then you'll see it is almost the disaster story of the OLB, and he didn't even practise astrology. Now combine that with what astrologers already believed in comets could cause, and you have the original story of the OLB disaster event. It's not just a flood, it's also earthquakes and erupting volcanoes and so on.
Btw, then still the sign of Pisces would be the best candidate according to many astrologers, even though it's 'just' a water sign.
-
You talk about atumnn, but the OLB mentions things already happening during the summer:
During the whole summer the sun had been hid behind the clouds, as if unwilling to look upon the earth. There was perpetual calm, and the damp mist hung like a wet sail over the houses and the marshes. The air was heavy and oppressive, and in mens hearts was neither joy nor cheerfulness. In the midst of this stillness the earth began to tremble as if she was dying. The mountains opened to vomit forth fire and flames. Some sank into the bosom of the earth, and ....
+++++++++++++++
EDIT:
There's another thing to consider:
Uranus and Neptune were discovered in the 17th century, Pluto in the 20th.
Someone believing in astrology would have tried to calculate a 'disaster date' based on the 'lights' he or she knew, and before the 17th century that would have meant only Moon, Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.
Someone from the mid-19th century would most probably also take the positions of Neptune and Uranus into consideration (and Halley's comet).
.
Found some time. It says 'During the WHOLE Summer...' - meaning imo the whole summer had passed, which would take you to Autumn. The calm appears to have still been there after the whole Summer had passed.
Yes, but in the days of the OLB it could have been thought that a comet did appear - as a conjunction took place ie; a conjunction took place - was thought to be a comet, possibly one with Mercury in it - so the effects that then appear globally were put down to a comet in later times but no comet would have been needed. Although I do understand what you mean. I think if the OLB writers had been referring to this idea they would have mentioned a comet. Even though the effects are what is described by Halley etc. the event itself would not have had to have been a comet. It appears it built up for some time and the odd weather conditions at least 3 months prior to it were some kind of warning, which is another reason it doesn't sound like a comet to me.
Read again what Plato says here:
I mean to say, he replied, that in mind you are all young; there is no old opinion handed down among you by ancient tradition, nor any science which is hoary with age. And I will tell you why. There have been, and will be again, many destructions of mankind arising out of many causes; the greatest have been brought about by the agencies of fire and water, and other lesser ones by innumerable other causes. There is a story, which even you have preserved, that once upon a time Paethon, the son of Helios, having yoked the steeds in his father's chariot, because he was not able to drive them in the path of his father, burnt up all that was upon the earth, and was himself destroyed by a thunderbolt. Now this has the form of a myth, but really signifies a declination of the bodies moving in the heavens around the earth, and a great conflagration of things upon the earth, which recurs after long intervals;
http://classics.mit....to/timaeus.html
What sounds like a story of a cometary impact is really a Declination of the bodies moving in the Heavens - and a great conflagration of things apon the Earth WHICH RECURS AFTER LONG INTERVALS.
This occurance, the declination in the Heavens, is known and is a cycle and RECURS after long intervals.
What exactly is a declination?
What Is Declination?
Planets travel in a 360 degree circle around the Sun, but they do not constantly stay at the same latitude. In fact, they are always moving up or down. These "ups and downs" are measured as the distance between a planet's current position and the earth's equator (as projected into the sky). This measurement is known as declination.
http://cafeastrology...clinations.html
As the planet moves around the Sun it's latitude changes in relation to the Earth, they move up and down - the measurement is taken on the Equator.
Therefore it seems to describe a movement of a particular planet - that declined down, after being noticeably higher in latitude.
This small change became a catastrophic cometary impact myth, the planet or star that was Phaethon most likely moved down so far in latitude it appeared to touch the Earth, fall into a far off river, it wasn't seen in the sky anymore. When this occurred, after long periods of time, conflagrations happened at this time.
This seems to be what might be being described by Plato.
It kinda reminded me of what they thought of comets though, portents of doom, bringing conflagrations.
Edited by The Puzzler, 03 January 2012 - 04:20 PM.