Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

What bank will be exposed by WIkileaks?


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1    emporio

emporio

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined:22 Nov 2010

Posted 01 December 2010 - 10:13 AM

As I'm sure you've all heard, thousands and thousands of documents have been released that have been incredibly embarrassing and damaging to U.S relations.

Wikileaks has also said that they will be releasing information on a well known bank that will expose its illegal activity in early 2011. It's said to be comparable with Enron.I cannot wait for this, because it's about damn time that stuff like this is getting media attention and people who should be held accountable will finally face justice.

Any how what bank are you betting on?

My guess is that it's going to be either Goldman Sachs or Bank Of America. BOA's stock dropped 3% today after this information was released, may be interesting. Personally, I hope it exposes Government Sachs because allooottt of information is bound to come out.

Thank god for the freedom of information on the interenet, finally people are seeing the Gov. for what it truly is.

Edited by emporio, 01 December 2010 - 10:27 AM.


#2    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The default position is to give a ****

Posted 01 December 2010 - 10:27 AM

wikileaks is a fake whistleblower site.

they can recall and censure anthony shaffers book operation dark heart, they can unlawfully shut down 70 web sites by decree just by seizing the domain names, but they can't shut down wikileaks, even when he announces ahead of time what he is going to release. doesn't make sense, unless it's a propaganda site.


#3    emporio

emporio

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined:22 Nov 2010

Posted 01 December 2010 - 10:33 AM

View PostLittle Fish, on 01 December 2010 - 10:27 AM, said:

wikileaks is a fake whistleblower site.

they can recall and censure anthony shaffers book operation dark heart, they can unlawfully shut down 70 web sites by decree just by seizing the domain names, but they can't shut down wikileaks, even when he announces ahead of time what he is going to release. doesn't make sense, unless it's a propaganda site.


Really? Wikileaks is a fake whistleblower site? What are you on? Seriously, I can't believe you even said that.


#4    HansBolman

HansBolman

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 207 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2009
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 December 2010 - 10:39 AM

An announcement like this could make someone a lot of money if they got hold of the info beforehand...I wonder if the owner of Wikileaks has shorted any banks stocks recently?


#5    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The default position is to give a ****

Posted 01 December 2010 - 11:12 AM

View Postemporio, on 01 December 2010 - 10:33 AM, said:

Really? Wikileaks is a fake whistleblower site? What are you on? Seriously, I can't believe you even said that.
why does it get so much attention from the corporate media when other whistleblowers get no attention? this assange character pops up from nowhere and even the bbc are all over him.

what has wikileaks "exposed" and what has it "reinforced"?

wikileaks is a cia soros operation.

on the board of wikileaks is top security official from google, you know google is a cia operation right?

trojan horse, controlled opposition, left gatekeeping, cognitive disruption, etc

perception management
http://en.wikipedia....tion_management




#6    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,649 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 01 December 2010 - 11:18 AM

The banks are the root of all the worlds problems and the "Federal Reserve" system of private banks is the the driver of bad outcomes. All the financial crisis of the last 4yrs have had the net effect of transfering assets as collateral into the hands of these international bankers. We are all now effectively wage slaves to these private banks and just as the debt bubble ballooned to unpayable levels in Africa and Asia the same will happen in the West. We will be on the never ending treadmill of debt rescheduling as interests rates keep just ahead of GDP.
Its time to wake up and bring the whole sicking edifice down. Basic money at interest is a criminal racket of transfering wealth from the masses to a tiny handful of super rich. We need to induce a run on the banks - the prospects are a fight for a better future free from indentured slavery or more of the same boom and bust cycling with each cycle transfering more assets to the super rich and away from YOU.



You may not have another chance again.

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#7    emporio

emporio

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined:22 Nov 2010

Posted 01 December 2010 - 11:36 AM

View PostLittle Fish, on 01 December 2010 - 11:12 AM, said:

why does it get so much attention from the corporate media when other whistleblowers get no attention? this assange character pops up from nowhere and even the bbc are all over him.

what has wikileaks "exposed" and what has it "reinforced"?

wikileaks is a cia soros operation.

on the board of wikileaks is top security official from google, you know google is a cia operation right?

trojan horse, controlled opposition, left gatekeeping, cognitive disruption, etc

perception management
http://en.wikipedia....tion_management



First, you don't understand how wikileaks works.

Their servers are spread all over the world. Under international jurisdictions. If one location is taken down, another one can take over, it's a mirrored site. There are like 5 or 6 of these mirrored sites that are protected against legal action. Wikipedia is a dot org, non profit and cannot be shut down. There servers switch locations all the time and are impossible to trace down and shut down. They had no choice. This information would have been out there and the government essentially had to choice but to come forward and confessed - it would have looked even worse if they had not. The site was shut down due to lack of DONATIONS in the recent past. Assange couldn't afford to host the site. This is a government run site? bull. He refuses to take donations from corporations, only from individuals.

What has it exposed? Go do some research, seriously. If you're questioning the integrity of the information, you need to get your head checked.


Show me proof of this top official on the board of wikileaks.

Edited by emporio, 01 December 2010 - 11:38 AM.


#8    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The default position is to give a ****

Posted 01 December 2010 - 11:44 AM

not sure cantona's idea will have an effect. there are strict limits on how much you can withdraw from a bank and the high street commercial banks are not the problem. The investment banks are the problem, remove gold and silver from the commodity markets, this will catch the top investment banks with their short positions on metals contracts. if everyone bought a silver coin the top banks would go bust and you'd make a fortune.

http://maxkeiser.com...-dollar-silver/



it was suggested here some years ago:
http://www.amazon.co...1203992&sr=8-22

Edited by Little Fish, 01 December 2010 - 11:47 AM.


#9    flyingswan

flyingswan

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,888 posts
  • Joined:13 Sep 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 01 December 2010 - 12:11 PM

View PostLittle Fish, on 01 December 2010 - 10:27 AM, said:

wikileaks is a fake whistleblower site.
Of course it is Little Fish.  After all, they've released all those thousands of documents and not one of your pet conspiracy theories has been confirmed.  Stands to reason, a real whistleblower site would confirm your beliefs.

Note than Ahmadinejad agrees with you, but then he has to in the circumstances.  Otherwise he'd have to admit that all his neighbours really hate him.
http://www.dailymail...ns-friends.html

Edited by flyingswan, 01 December 2010 - 12:16 PM.

"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true" - Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
In which case it is fortunate that:
"Science is the best defense against believing what we want to" - Ian Stewart (1945- )

#10    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The default position is to give a ****

Posted 01 December 2010 - 12:12 PM

View Postemporio, on 01 December 2010 - 11:36 AM, said:

What has it exposed? Go do some research, seriously.
tell me what it has exposed, seriously.

Quote

Show me proof of this top official on the board of wikileaks.
from the video i gave you, ben laurie works with google and wikileaks

wikileaks has another board member from the tibetan democracy movement, the tibetan democracy movement is a soros sponsored NED group
http://www.globalres...ext=va&aid=6530


#11    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The default position is to give a ****

Posted 01 December 2010 - 12:29 PM

View Postflyingswan, on 01 December 2010 - 12:11 PM, said:

Note than Ahmadinejad agrees with you, but then he has to in the circumstances.  Otherwise he'd have to admit that all his neighbours really hate him.
http://www.dailymail...ns-friends.html
cui bono?
who benefits from putting it out that iran is hated by all its neighbours?
how is this "exposing" anything?
this is the message that the neocons and israeli establishment want you to hear.

what you are seeing is pro-war propaganda.

Edited by Little Fish, 01 December 2010 - 12:30 PM.


#12    flyingswan

flyingswan

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,888 posts
  • Joined:13 Sep 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 01 December 2010 - 12:40 PM

View PostLittle Fish, on 01 December 2010 - 12:29 PM, said:

what you are seeing is pro-war propaganda.
Yeah, yeah, believe that if it makes you happy.

"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true" - Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
In which case it is fortunate that:
"Science is the best defense against believing what we want to" - Ian Stewart (1945- )

#13    Jessem

Jessem

    Future Husband

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,451 posts
  • Joined:17 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Starry Sky

  • No matter what anyone say's, you can make a difference... you probably already have.

Posted 01 December 2010 - 01:01 PM

It's definitely BOA, they use American citizens ssn to sell to illegals for more business. They got busted when someone happend to to hack into over 1 million card numbers a couple of years ago.

The secret of life is'nt trying to figure out the secret, its about living it.

#14    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The default position is to give a ****

Posted 01 December 2010 - 03:02 PM

I'll go with bank of america, and when it collapses wikileaks will get the blame for the economic damage, then they'll shut down the internet as a matter of national security and give us a corporate controlled internet-2 with less freedom of speech.


#15    HansBolman

HansBolman

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 207 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2009
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 December 2010 - 03:39 PM

Assange is actually a bit of a dick, he's just messing up society for his own gain..





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users