Ryu, on 04 March 2011 - 10:50 PM, said:
I am aware of that but thanks for pointing that out to me.
I have no qualms about that at all. What I object to is calling this circus a college to begin with. "College" usually denotes something where you actually learn something of value. This fantasy land organization that Oberon is putting together should be labled something else so people don't get the idea that it is something legitimate or even funded by any government.
The problem is that herbalism and alchemy IS being lumped together with this wizardry nonsense. Herbs do have a real use in this world and it has nothing to do with spells or made up deities. Alchemy was the precursor to many legitimate sciences but once again it is made into something clownish by lumping it in with wizardry.
I am sure it is fun and admittedly it seems tempting to me too but if I really want to learn something that is actually useful about herbs or alchemy (historically) then I will go to a real school and/or read books written by people who don't make themselves look like something from a cheap fantasy novel.
That is all I am saying.
I have nothing against fun.
I think you may think the school is something that it's not. I daresay it is using the popularity of Harry Potter-ish "magic" to lure people in. . .but the classes themselves are pretty much basic Paganism, probably with a Wiccan bend. Herbalism, liturgy, nature study, etc. I don't know about their nature study, but MY nature study was brutal. Not only did I have to learn names of local edible plants and herbs (common and scientific names) I also had to go out into the world and prove I could identify them accurately. Then I had to know what the herbs did, what medicines/herbs they interacted with, and how to properly prepare them. . . How they would react within the body, what chemicals they interacted with, what receptors they interacted with, the list goes on. I also had to learn every possible factor of my local environment, from invasive ant species to every minor detail about the local watersheds. I would have also had to learn wilderness survival, but I had already taken that up when I was younger. For liturgy, which I'm still doing, I have to research Indo-European history. . .I have to not only know names and dates of people and places, but significant archaeological finds and studies, social and cultural interactions of the time, politics, language. . .I'm expected to learn languages, for that matter. Not one language, a few. . .especially languages that are relevant to analysis of ancient writings.
There's nothing clownish about it. Sure, we have fun with it, but it doesn't mean the knowledge itself isn't taken seriously and that its something that should be considered "less true" because of the name it is taught under. Will I learn as much as someone that went to college for a career? Maybe not, but its not for a career, its for a religion. . .and, I daresay, as far as religions go, the "real" knowledge factor is pretty huge, and it spans a wide range of subjects. I can say that I know what a Solenopsis invicta Buren is (and enough about it to write a novel) as well as how to make an awesome soap for people with eczema. The range of knowledge and the depths of which you must learn it is nothing to shake a stick (or wand

) at.
And, since I've gone through all of that, and have much more to go through to "graduate", if I want to walk around in a wizard suit in the process to make it all a little more fun and entertaining, then I will do it proudly.