I don't have the time or the will to read through all 97 pages. I have already found a big fundamental floor with the "Iran is building flying saucers".
Put the energy source aside one minute.
The USA, Russia and UK experimented with saucer shaped craft in the late 1940's and early 1950's using conventional propulsion. All of them dropped their projects because of the same reason. A saucer/disc shape makes a lousy aircraft. It is not aerodynamically efficient in the air and practically impossible to fly.
So why does any new revolutionary power source have to go in a saucer? Why not in a conventional aerodynamic shape? I suppose an anti-gravity lift doesn't require wings for lift, but surely it will still suffer drag. Why not build something that will cut through the air rather than fight it.
If we really wanted too we could build saucers today using nuclear propulsion. It was tested and worked on a B29 which would have stayed in the sky for weeks without refueling. Again it was dropped as the reactors needed too much shielding and would have caused devastation if they crashed.
Going back to Keshe and his power source claims. If this is true and the Iranians are using it then why on Earth are they so hell bent on Nuclear technology.
Edited by skookum, 07 January 2013 - 10:37 AM.