psyche101, on 17 May 2012 - 01:44 AM, said:
Even though you have been shown the flaws and that research has been happening for decades without a product still? The more I read your posts, the more likely it seems the you are recruiting for Keshe. We have working technologies, even new ones like Blue Gen, which you failed to notice. I thought that was a it rude seeming as you claim to be interested in new technologies. Why have you nothing to say on that? It works and is in production, is it another technology you wish to stifle?
I believe that is a lie, you could get most of the gear you need for the Stan Meyer patens from the tip as bmk told you. You have no intention of making anything, you just want people to think you had some epiphany, and that you can support the reasons why, when that is not the case is it?
Set up an institute, yet you cannot raise the dollars to make Stan Meyers patent? How is anyone supposed to believe that? Was that one Keshe's idea or yours?
And you are trying to convince others to avoid working technologies to support this nonsense. There are few reasons you would do so, and none of them honest ones.
Why. You cannot even explain how gravity works!!!!!!
Yes you are, you keep trying to promote Keshe and Rossi. Dick Smith HAS the money and he approached Rossi. Rossi ran and hid from him. You refuse to answer why. The patent I gave you is something you could start on right now, but you never will.
How much energy has Solar, Wind and Hydro generated to date?
By comparison
How much energy has LENR produced to date?
See! Again you are lying! Solar has been a massive success in all of Germany, and it is following suit in Australia. Hydro power runs entire cities all over the world. It s solving the worlds problems while scammers fleece the population with long winded promises so that they never have to work a day in their lives. Where is LENR? How many cities is it running? How many LENR units are feeding free power back into the grids? People like you are the reasons people are so suspicious of such failing technologies, and yes, they do fail, 50 years on the drawing board without a single reproducible result is a failure in my book. As long as people are not honest about LENR, it's reputation will continue to decline. I think your argument for LENR is a good reason to shut down R&D associated with it.












