UziStuNNa1, on 04 October 2011 - 02:09 PM, said:
I was only playing devil's advocate, no pun intended...
And of course an organized government could ban organized religion; if they can ban drugs, they can for sure ban religion, as religion is the 'opiate of the people'.
And yes, this man has needed some help long before this act happened. He just probably was a shy/quiet man and nobody really noticed anything until he committed this act.
Religion doesn't turn people into crazy lunatics, just as drugs don't turn people into crazy lunatics. The craziness was already there, and the religion/ the drug helped push them to where they would have gone already.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you have a problem with the ban on psychoactive substances. Now I agree with your perspective, especially considering most religions resulted from the use of psychoactive substances (including christianity), but it really doesn't pertain to the current discussion.
This man clearly had a serious mental illness, I'm guessing paranoid schizophrenia. Yes schizophrenics are often attracted to religion, and yes religion causes a lot of problems and should probably just go away, but a mentally stable person would not rip out their eyes no matter how religious they are.