was somehow laid up against this pyramid and many millions of men dragged
stones up it and then walked back down. They are proposing this despite
the fact that there are no ramp builders known to have existed and not a
single man who dragged stone. Many of the jobs are known but not one in-
dicative of ramps or a muscle based system. Instead they leave the absense
of ramps as proof they mustta used ramps.
left the vertical lines visible in the great pyramids. Ramps fly in the
face of common sense which dictates that the largest lifting project in hu-
man history should have used an efficient means of lifting the stone.
great pyramid building age that applies as a means to lift objects! Still
Egyptologists insist on ramps. They implying that these people were simply
too stupid to devise any other means of lifting than the most inefficient.
ment until someone gets out there and disproves it. This is a fact. It
doesn't matter that the support falls short of being conclusive because ramps
are supported by nothing but air. This isn't even an arguable point but I'd
be happy to lay out the extensive evidence that stones moved up the side or
the more extensive evidence that ramps never existed as a means to lift stone.
This battle has already been lost by orthodoxy whether they choose to admit
the fact or not. If they try to prove me wrong they'll end up only proving
You've thrown out a few good physical bits, like pieces of rope and eyelets of stone. But to keep depending on the Pyramid Texts for your Heavy Lifting is making you look simply stubborn and Defensive of your pet theory, rather then open minded.