1026 replies to this topic

[Homan34]

http://www.youtube.c...bed/PWxJmbicuf8
Recent Interview with Buzz Aldrin on French TV, where he confirms the Apollo crew had a UFO encounter and why they didn't say anything.

Source: Paranominal.com

Please share your views regarding UFO sighting by NASA Astronaut.

[bee]

Thanks for posting.

It always feels like Buzz wants to say more but has to stop himself, probably because further information

would be getting into the 'classified' area? So he has to just give the bare minimum and keep it simple?

He certainly does do the rounds with his basic story.

[Darkwind]

I don't know, it is a unidentified flying object.  I bet it is a piece of space junk broke off from their own rocket.  It doesn't look like a space craft really. Maybe it belongs to the Russians to track the mission, but I would doubt it.  

[quillius]

 Darkwind, on 08 November 2011 - 01:03 PM, said:

I don't know, it is a unidentified flying object.  I bet it is a piece of space junk broke off from their own rocket.  It doesn't look like a space craft really. Maybe it belongs to the Russians to track the mission, but I would doubt it.  

I would have hoped that these men would be quite familiar with space junk, especially from their own rocket...

[HMS Dreadnought]

I don't get how people can doubt a man like him.

[AquaMerina]

 HMS Dreadnought, on 08 November 2011 - 01:51 PM, said:

I don't get how people can doubt a man like him.

People doubt people like Buzz because they don't have any physical evidence to support their claims and their previous employers do not agree with their claims.

[quillius]

 AquaMerina, on 08 November 2011 - 02:52 PM, said:

People doubt people like Buzz because they don't have any physical evidence to support their claims and their previous employers do not agree with their claims.

Physical evidence may not exist, and if it did I dont see how they would be allowed easy access to it by their employers, let alone their employers agreeing with them publicly.

Edited by quillius, 08 November 2011 - 03:02 PM.

[AquaMerina]

 quillius, on 08 November 2011 - 03:02 PM, said:

Physical evidence may not exist, and if it did I dont see how they would be allowed easy access to it by their employers, let alone their employers agreeing with them publicly.

The bolded part, this is the problem I think.  IF E.T's are real and their crafts are what many of us refer to as UFO's, most assume the beings and their crafts would be physical.

How do we collect physical evidances from things if they are not physical?

IF E.T's and their crafts are not physical, then what are they?

Energy, plasmas, something undiscovered? Who knows?

It's not like the ones who would know, would tell any of us.

[quillius]

 AquaMerina, on 08 November 2011 - 03:43 PM, said:

The bolded part, this is the problem I think.  IF E.T's are real and their crafts are what many of us refer to as UFO's, most assume the beings and their crafts would be physical.

How do we collect physical evidances from things if they are not physical?

IF E.T's and their crafts are not physical, then what are they?

Energy, plasmas, something undiscovered? Who knows?

It's not like the ones who would know, would tell any of us.

Hey AquaMerina, I agree with your points here and often ponder the same questions you have raised....

who knows    

(by the way, great profile quote   )

[TheMcGuffin]

 bee, on 08 November 2011 - 12:55 PM, said:

Thanks for posting.

It always feels like Buzz wants to say more but has to stop himself, probably because further information

would be getting into the 'classified' area? So he has to just give the bare minimum and keep it simple?

He certainly does do the rounds with his basic story.

The thing people need to remember about Buzz and the rest is that they were good soldiers.  I fully agree that they're heroes and that they definitely had the right stuff to do what they did, but all of the guys who landed on the moon were military men, except one.  They were often fighter pilots, combat veterans, which means when they get an order they are going to salute and say "yes sir".  When they are told something is classified and that they're not to blab about it, they will clam up.

That's why I think we have gotten some very general statements from them about UFOs, including their own sightings, but not a lot of detail.  And it's not a question about which astronauts had UFO sightings and ET encounters out there because I think they all did--every one of them.  

U.S government policy has always been to slap some kind of "explanation" on these, bury and deny the ones they can't and hope the sheeple will just go back to watching Days of our Lives and The Price is Right. Even a very dumb explanation will do if no other is available, on the assumption that most people aren't paying close attention anyway.  

Gordon Cooper was the one exception who spoke in great detail about his UFO sighings, be he was always a maverick.

[mcrom901]

 TheMcGuffin, on 08 November 2011 - 06:27 PM, said:

Gordon Cooper was the one exception who spoke in great detail about his UFO sighings,

115:03:24 Mitchell: Well, let's see...We've had visitors again.

115:03:28 Shepard: Yeah. Hardly worth mentioning.

115:03:33 Mitchell: Agree. (Pause)

[TheMcGuffin]

 meryem, on 08 November 2011 - 12:35 PM, said:

http://www.youtube.c...bed/PWxJmbicuf8
Recent Interview with Buzz Aldrin on French TV, where he confirms the Apollo crew had a UFO encounter and why they didn't say anything.

Please share your views regarding UFO sighting by NASA Astronaut.

I'd say they knew full well that it wasn't part of the second stage rocket, which was thousands of miles behind them, and that the UFO was stationary for a while there, blinking at them.

It could have been saying "Welcome to the Moon" or "Eat at Joe's" for all I know, but NASA had to "explain" it as something so they said it was part of the rocket. I don't have to be a rocket scientist to know a cover story when I hear one, although I'm often amazed at the lack of curiosity on the part of so many real scientists.  

Of course, I'm also well away that curiosity about UFOs has been very actively discouraged in academia and the scientific community, by absurd "studies" like those of Dr. Condon and so forth.

[mcrom901]

 TheMcGuffin, on 08 November 2011 - 06:37 PM, said:

and that the UFO was stationary for a while there,

it was moving along

[TheMcGuffin]

 mcrom901, on 08 November 2011 - 06:35 PM, said:

115:03:24 Mitchell: Well, let's see...We've had visitors again.

115:03:28 Shepard: Yeah. Hardly worth mentioning.

115:03:33 Mitchell: Agree. (Pause)

Just like the guy on one of the space shuttle missions whose buddy sees a UFO whizzing by but when asked if he saw it replied "I don't know what you're talking about".  

My only question in all those situations is whether those are our UFOs or theirs.....

Edited by TheMcGuffin, 08 November 2011 - 06:40 PM.

[mcrom901]

 TheMcGuffin, on 08 November 2011 - 06:40 PM, said:

My only question in all those situations is whether those are our UFOs or theirs.....

they belong to a third party