Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Just watched 'The Thing' (2011)


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1    George Ford

George Ford

    smile

  • Member
  • 2,819 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunderland UK

  • "Quickly, I require your fingers."

Posted 10 December 2011 - 10:39 PM

Really good acting, effects and nerve wreaking! So glad they made it the way they did. Ties in with the John Carpenter film of the same name really well.

You should buy it!  :tu:

(Also the whole time I was watching it I was thinking they should definitely make 'The Mountains of Madness' by H P Lovecraft. The setting and effects would work perfectly!!!!!!)

“Extraordinary claims require extraoardinary evidence”

~
Carl Sagan

#2    Vaise

Vaise

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 641 posts
  • Joined:19 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/VaiseShepard/videos

Posted 13 December 2011 - 11:30 AM

i also enjoyed The Thing 2011, took my girlfriend scared the hell outta her, we came straight home and watched John Carpenters thing straight away ^^

Posted Image

I’d rather trust and regret than doubt and regret:- Kirito


#3    GoldenRabbit

GoldenRabbit

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 192 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney Australia

Posted 17 December 2011 - 02:16 AM

Cant wait to see it, Loved the 1982 version,

Go The Bunnies :tu:

#4    MysticStrummer

MysticStrummer

    Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 880 posts
  • Joined:15 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central Texas

  • The great path has no gates. Thousands of roads enter it. When one passes through this gateless gate, he walks freely between heaven and earth.

Posted 17 December 2011 - 05:40 PM

Being a fan of the original I was surprised to really enjoy the new one. Well... not the original... but the Carpenter version.

Edited by MysticStrummer, 17 December 2011 - 05:40 PM.

Ummon asked : "The world is such a wide world, why do you answer a bell and don ceremonial robes?" ~ Zen Flesh Zen Bones

#5    Alaskanangel

Alaskanangel

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 55 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Female

Posted 21 December 2011 - 03:42 AM

I haven't seen it yet but when i saw the trailer I was kind of annoyed that they missed a few small things.

I just might have to watch it now!!


#6    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,549 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 21 December 2011 - 03:36 PM

All three are quite good.

It's rare that a remake is as good as the original, but to have a "three-make" still hold up to the first two is amazing.

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#7    GoldenRabbit

GoldenRabbit

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 192 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney Australia

Posted 03 January 2012 - 05:47 AM

got this downloading now so looking forward to it :)

Go The Bunnies :tu:

#8    Paranormalcy

Paranormalcy

    Titanic's Deck Swab

  • Member
  • 5,569 posts
  • Joined:04 May 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NE OK USA

  • "Friday, Friday, gotta get down on Friday."

Posted 03 January 2012 - 11:19 AM

While it could be argued the Thing was "new" and had little understanding of stealth, deception and guile, and only learned that as it imitated Man, I was disappointed there was none of the subtlety of the Carpenter Thing. It was along the lines of, "I think Joe here may be the thing. Joe, what do you say to that?" Joe: "BLAAAAARGH!" *tentacles waving* It wasn't bad, though I detested the CGI, like I always do, and I liked the way they tried to tie in to the Carpenter movie. I just feel like the movie missed a lot of the point.

UM Rules | Ouija/Ideomotor | Sleep Paralys./Hypnogogia | Ouija: 252hrs/4y+, View: Ideomotor



#9    George Ford

George Ford

    smile

  • Member
  • 2,819 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunderland UK

  • "Quickly, I require your fingers."

Posted 03 January 2012 - 12:39 PM

View PostParanormalcy, on 03 January 2012 - 11:19 AM, said:

While it could be argued the Thing was "new" and had little understanding of stealth, deception and guile, and only learned that as it imitated Man, I was disappointed there was none of the subtlety of the Carpenter Thing. It was along the lines of, "I think Joe here may be the thing. Joe, what do you say to that?" Joe: "BLAAAAARGH!" *tentacles waving* It wasn't bad, though I detested the CGI, like I always do, and I liked the way they tried to tie in to the Carpenter movie. I just feel like the movie missed a lot of the point.

John Carpenters The Thing had special effects that will still look amazing in 100 years time! I thought the new Thing was still very good for CGI, I like the way they show you how the monster with 2 faces from John Carpenters film was made by the alien. There are a lot of tie ins with the JC one as well, like in the JC film you see an axe embedded in the wall when Kurt Russel goes to the Norwegian base, in the new film you see how that happened.

Could it have been better, of course. BUT still a great film IMO and I will be watching what this directer does in the future.

Do you think the alien ship was made by a different species and 'The Thing' got loose on the ship and ate them all? Like it was a weapon that got loose?

Kind of like what I think happened in the film Alien.

By the way the trialer for the new Alien film is out, it's called Prometheus.

“Extraordinary claims require extraoardinary evidence”

~
Carl Sagan

#10    Antilles

Antilles

    NCC-1701

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:2nd star from the left

Posted 04 January 2012 - 05:41 AM

View Postbulveye, on 03 January 2012 - 12:39 PM, said:

John Carpenters The Thing had special effects that will still look amazing in 100 years time! I thought the new Thing was still very good for CGI, I like the way they show you how the monster with 2 faces from John Carpenters film was made by the alien. There are a lot of tie ins with the JC one as well, like in the JC film you see an axe embedded in the wall when Kurt Russel goes to the Norwegian base, in the new film you see how that happened.

Could it have been better, of course. BUT still a great film IMO and I will be watching what this directer does in the future.

Do you think the alien ship was made by a different species and 'The Thing' got loose on the ship and ate them all? Like it was a weapon that got loose?

Kind of like what I think happened in the film Alien.

By the way the trialer for the new Alien film is out, it's called Prometheus.

The new film would have to be pretty damn good to beat Carpenter's remake.

Scared the .... out of me 1st time I saw it.

Nothing beats a good round of paranoia.


#11    GoldenRabbit

GoldenRabbit

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 192 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney Australia

Posted 04 January 2012 - 08:42 AM

I must admit i didn't enjoy this as much as Carpenter's film, I did like the way they made the end of this movie join onto the beginning of Carpenter's film.

If anyone here uses utorrent let me know and ill send you a link that will let you upload the movie directly from me:)It will only work utorrent though.

Edited by david_36, 04 January 2012 - 08:44 AM.

Go The Bunnies :tu:

#12    Oma_Desala

Oma_Desala

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Joined:23 Mar 2012

Posted 23 March 2012 - 11:49 AM

For a second there I had it confused with The Blob  :wacko:

Is it really as good as the Carpenter version? might give it a whirl, then. :tu:

Edited by Oma_Desala, 23 March 2012 - 11:51 AM.


#13    ImmortalSupernaturalAlien

ImmortalSupernaturalAlien

    Face Hugger

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,287 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:The Milky Way

  • Aliens. Aliens everywhere.

Posted 11 September 2012 - 06:18 PM

I've watched the '82 version of The Thing, but I really wanna see this one so damn bad!!!!


#14    cenobite

cenobite

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,114 posts
  • Joined:28 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:england

  • old age and treachery will always overcome youth and enthusiasm

Posted 11 September 2012 - 07:19 PM

View Postbulveye, on 10 December 2011 - 10:39 PM, said:

Really good acting, effects and nerve wreaking! So glad they made it the way they did. Ties in with the John Carpenter film of the same name really well.

You should buy it!  :tu:

(Also the whole time I was watching it I was thinking they should definitely make 'The Mountains of Madness' by H P Lovecraft. The setting and effects would work perfectly!!!!!!)
i could'nt disagree more, the cgi effects were poor and it tried to ape john carpenters film too much, several scenes felt like they were just different version of carpenters scenes, i thought it was lazy film makiing. I do agree about the mountains of madness though, guillermo del toro was due to direct a version, but sadly the studio baulked. Im really not a fan of cgi effects, its ok when done right but for my money the effects in john carpenters film were much better

TCB

#15    Mantis914

Mantis914

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,083 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lone Star State

  • You have shown me a strange image, and they are strange prisoners. Plato

Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:02 PM

Has anyone read, "Who Goes There?", talk about intense!





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users