Quote
Wouldn't the same logic apply to ghosts, aliens, magic, God/religion, miracles, psychic abilities, ect... ???
If so, then this entire site/forum is a wasted effort, right? Only here for entertainment value...
I'm under the impression that this site IS only here for entertainment value. Are you under a different impression?
I
Quote
think there is something behind the Bigfoot phenomena,
So do I. It is a wonderful illustration of the human mind and how it works.
Quote
be it mass subcontious delusion,
We know that the mind fills in gaps that the eye has. We KNOW this happens. And this is why the photos are also so terrible, but the eyewitness claims that they saw it so clear. The camera eye doesn't lie, but the human eye does.
Quote
"hobo?"
Is it 1919 again? But sure, some sightings could actually be people in the woods, sure.
Quote
That one is virtually impossible.
Quote
And arguing that it is not because an ape (that you decide the physical properties of)
I don't decide anything. I just apply what we know about the ecology and animals to the discussion. It's the bigfoot believers who have to make up new properties for their bigfoot. Because, if we apply the existing properties based on our knowledge of the ecology and our wealth of zoological knowledge, bigfoot cannot be real. Hence, the imagining of all these new properties for bigfoot. ie: he has a super long stomach to digest the plants in the PNW, he has some sort of low frequency distress call undetectable by humans or our technology to call to his friends when he's almost dead, he can maintain his species with a number FAR lower than required by all other mammals, he has the culture to bury his dead, yet somehow hides that culture, etc. etc.
All made up to shoehorn bigfoot into the existing ecology.
Quote
your opinion is very limited in imagination.
That's right. I apply as little imagination to a scientific problem as I consciously can, choosing to base my opinion on the logical application of scientific knowledge and logic.