Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Green glowing .....


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#16    Simbi Laveau

Simbi Laveau

    Overlord A. Snuffleupagus

  • Member
  • 8,266 posts
  • Joined:26 Feb 2012
  • Location:Rim of hell

  • ~So what's all this then ?!

Posted 16 March 2012 - 03:28 AM

View Postvitruvian12, on 15 March 2012 - 07:33 PM, said:

What objective method do you use to determine which orbs are dust and which are actual spirits?  Or is it just whichever you decide them to be in your own opinion?  What proof do you have that any orbs are spirits or thaat spirits even exist?  You are using nothing but your own unfounded beliefs as a starting point.
Its obvious which is which.
Nothing unfounded about it.

Miss me?

#17    Oppono Astos

Oppono Astos

    Overlord of Delgon

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,094 posts
  • Joined:06 Jan 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beyond your dimension

Posted 16 March 2012 - 06:22 AM

View Postmissymoo999, on 16 March 2012 - 03:28 AM, said:

Its obvious which is which.
Nothing unfounded about it.
This doesn't answer the question at all.  How do you determine what is obvious?

20 years of empirical investigation and research confirm to me that all photographic orbs are particulates illuminated by the camera.

Who is the skeptic: the realist who won't accept belief, or the believer who won't accept reality?

#18    vitruvian12

vitruvian12

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,855 posts
  • Joined:26 Dec 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:British Columbia

Posted 16 March 2012 - 03:18 PM

View Postmissymoo999, on 16 March 2012 - 03:28 AM, said:

Its obvious which is which.
Nothing unfounded about it.
You dont see how that is a completely subjective decision on your part do you?


#19    Simbi Laveau

Simbi Laveau

    Overlord A. Snuffleupagus

  • Member
  • 8,266 posts
  • Joined:26 Feb 2012
  • Location:Rim of hell

  • ~So what's all this then ?!

Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:05 PM

View Postvitruvian12, on 16 March 2012 - 03:18 PM, said:

You dont see how that is a completely subjective decision on your part do you?
Quite possibly ,as I do not *care* about all the alleged scientific semantics ,and gosh its not proven ,blah dee blah dee blah skeptic theories.

As I said,I saw one with the naked eye once .One of my cats had them all around him in photos when I first adopted him,no matter where the photo was taken,time of day.No other cats had the orbs around them,same photos,just one  ,and they had tails,as if moving.

Ones that look like water on a window pane,yah,dust,moving tails and seen with the naked eye,real.

That cat had lived in a witchcraft Shoppe prior to my taking him,where numerous rituals took place.Who knows what attached itself to him .
I cleansed my cat with a small ritual,and all the orbs were gone in any photos there after.
My beliefs on it .No interest in proving any of it scientifically .

Miss me?

#20    thalassinus

thalassinus

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 74 posts
  • Joined:03 Jan 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:wiltshire

Posted 16 March 2012 - 08:13 PM

View PostOppono Astos, on 16 March 2012 - 06:22 AM, said:

This doesn't answer the question at all.  How do you determine what is obvious?

20 years of empirical investigation and research confirm to me that all photographic orbs are particulates illuminated by the camera.


seriously......are you a troll or something.

"Hate is easy, Love takes courage."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users