I got out of the Army in 1971. Even in those old days there was such a thing as a 'tactical' (as opposed to strategic) nuclear weapon. Small, perhaps "suitcase" sized low-yield nuclear weapons.
My guess is that we have done serious weapons development since 1971.
If you were familiar with tactical nukes, then why did you suggest that a nuke could have been responsible? Anyone who is familiar with nukes would have known there was no way a nuke was detonated inside the WTC building. Not only have you shown a lack of knowledge on aviation issues, but a lack of knowledge of military weaponry as well.
Once again, what is the temperature created by a nuclear weapon at detonation?
Edited by skyeagle409, 17 July 2012 - 07:48 PM.